| Message ID | E1ol981-00EDSj-FZ@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
| Headers | show |
| Series | net: sfp: improve high power module implementation | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| netdev/tree_selection | success | Clearly marked for net-next |
| netdev/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag not required for -next series |
| netdev/subject_prefix | success | Link |
| netdev/cover_letter | success | Series has a cover letter |
| netdev/patch_count | success | Link |
| netdev/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
| netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/cc_maintainers | success | CCed 8 of 8 maintainers |
| netdev/build_clang | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
| netdev/check_selftest | success | No net selftest shell script |
| netdev/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
| netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 10 lines checked |
| netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 02:29:01PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > Power level 3 was included in SFF-8472 revision 11.9, but this does > not have a compliance code. Use revision 11.4 as the minimum > compliance level instead. > > This should avoid any spurious indication of 2W modules. > > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Andrew
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c index a7635b02524a..af676e28ba6a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c +++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c @@ -1764,7 +1764,9 @@ static int sfp_module_parse_power(struct sfp *sfp) if (sfp->id.ext.sff8472_compliance >= SFP_SFF8472_COMPLIANCE_REV10_2 && sfp->id.ext.options & cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_POWER_DECL)) power_mW = 1500; - if (sfp->id.ext.options & cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_HIGH_POWER_LEVEL)) + /* Added in Rev 11.9, but there is no compliance code for this */ + if (sfp->id.ext.sff8472_compliance >= SFP_SFF8472_COMPLIANCE_REV11_4 && + sfp->id.ext.options & cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_HIGH_POWER_LEVEL)) power_mW = 2000; /* Power level 1 modules (max. 1W) are always supported. */
Power level 3 was included in SFF-8472 revision 11.9, but this does not have a compliance code. Use revision 11.4 as the minimum compliance level instead. This should avoid any spurious indication of 2W modules. Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> --- drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)