diff mbox series

[net-next,1/2] net: sfp: re-implement ignoring the hardware TX_FAULT signal

Message ID E1qnfXc-008UDY-91@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit e184e8609f8c1cd9fef703f667245b6ebd89c2ed
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series Rework tx fault fixups | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 1340 this patch: 1340
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 8 of 8 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1363 this patch: 1363
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1363 this patch: 1363
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 58 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Russell King (Oracle) Oct. 3, 2023, 1:34 p.m. UTC 
Re-implement how we ignore the hardware TX_FAULT signal. Rather than
having a separate boolean for this, use a bitmask of the hardware
signals that we wish to ignore. This gives more flexibility in the
future to ignore other signals such as RX_LOS.

Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
---
 drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
index a50038a45250..1f32e936d3ab 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
@@ -257,6 +257,7 @@  struct sfp {
 	unsigned int state_hw_drive;
 	unsigned int state_hw_mask;
 	unsigned int state_soft_mask;
+	unsigned int state_ignore_mask;
 	unsigned int state;
 
 	struct delayed_work poll;
@@ -280,7 +281,6 @@  struct sfp {
 	unsigned int rs_state_mask;
 
 	bool have_a2;
-	bool tx_fault_ignore;
 
 	const struct sfp_quirk *quirk;
 
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@  static void sfp_fixup_long_startup(struct sfp *sfp)
 
 static void sfp_fixup_ignore_tx_fault(struct sfp *sfp)
 {
-	sfp->tx_fault_ignore = true;
+	sfp->state_ignore_mask |= SFP_F_TX_FAULT;
 }
 
 // For 10GBASE-T short-reach modules
@@ -789,7 +789,8 @@  static void sfp_soft_start_poll(struct sfp *sfp)
 
 	mutex_lock(&sfp->st_mutex);
 	// Poll the soft state for hardware pins we want to ignore
-	sfp->state_soft_mask = ~sfp->state_hw_mask & mask;
+	sfp->state_soft_mask = ~sfp->state_hw_mask & ~sfp->state_ignore_mask &
+			       mask;
 
 	if (sfp->state_soft_mask & (SFP_F_LOS | SFP_F_TX_FAULT) &&
 	    !sfp->need_poll)
@@ -2314,7 +2315,7 @@  static int sfp_sm_mod_probe(struct sfp *sfp, bool report)
 	sfp->module_t_start_up = T_START_UP;
 	sfp->module_t_wait = T_WAIT;
 
-	sfp->tx_fault_ignore = false;
+	sfp->state_ignore_mask = 0;
 
 	if (sfp->id.base.extended_cc == SFF8024_ECC_10GBASE_T_SFI ||
 	    sfp->id.base.extended_cc == SFF8024_ECC_10GBASE_T_SR ||
@@ -2337,6 +2338,8 @@  static int sfp_sm_mod_probe(struct sfp *sfp, bool report)
 
 	if (sfp->quirk && sfp->quirk->fixup)
 		sfp->quirk->fixup(sfp);
+
+	sfp->state_hw_mask &= ~sfp->state_ignore_mask;
 	mutex_unlock(&sfp->st_mutex);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -2838,10 +2841,7 @@  static void sfp_check_state(struct sfp *sfp)
 	mutex_lock(&sfp->st_mutex);
 	state = sfp_get_state(sfp);
 	changed = state ^ sfp->state;
-	if (sfp->tx_fault_ignore)
-		changed &= SFP_F_PRESENT | SFP_F_LOS;
-	else
-		changed &= SFP_F_PRESENT | SFP_F_LOS | SFP_F_TX_FAULT;
+	changed &= SFP_F_PRESENT | SFP_F_LOS | SFP_F_TX_FAULT;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < GPIO_MAX; i++)
 		if (changed & BIT(i))