diff mbox series

[bpf] bpf: update BPF LSM maintainer list

Message ID ZnA-1qdtXS1TayD7@google.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 66b5867150630e8f9c9a2b7430e55a3beaa83a5b
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf] bpf: update BPF LSM maintainer list | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-PR success PR summary
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success No Fixes tags, but series doesn't touch code
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit fail Errors and warnings before: 45 this patch: 45
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 1 of 1 maintainers
netdev/build_clang fail Errors and warnings before: 36 this patch: 36
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn fail Errors and warnings before: 45 this patch: 45
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 14 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Matt Bobrowski June 17, 2024, 1:49 p.m. UTC 
After catching up with KP recently, we discussed that I will be now be
responsible for co-maintaining the BPF LSM. Adding myself as
designated maintainer of the BPF LSM, and specifying more files in
which the BPF LSM maintenance responsibilities should now extend out
to. This is at the back of all the BPF kfuncs that have been added
recently, which are fundamentally restricted to being used only from
BPF LSM program types.

Signed-off-by: Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org June 18, 2024, 3:40 p.m. UTC | #1 
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:

On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:49:10 +0000 you wrote:
> After catching up with KP recently, we discussed that I will be now be
> responsible for co-maintaining the BPF LSM. Adding myself as
> designated maintainer of the BPF LSM, and specifying more files in
> which the BPF LSM maintenance responsibilities should now extend out
> to. This is at the back of all the BPF kfuncs that have been added
> recently, which are fundamentally restricted to being used only from
> BPF LSM program types.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf] bpf: update BPF LSM maintainer list
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/66b586715063

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index cd3277a98cfe..8f8ceca5a380 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -4083,12 +4083,13 @@  F:	kernel/bpf/ringbuf.c
 
 BPF [SECURITY & LSM] (Security Audit and Enforcement using BPF)
 M:	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
-R:	Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>
+M:	Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>
 L:	bpf@vger.kernel.org
 S:	Maintained
 F:	Documentation/bpf/prog_lsm.rst
 F:	include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
 F:	kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
+F:	kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
 F:	security/bpf/
 
 BPF [SELFTESTS] (Test Runners & Infrastructure)