From patchwork Tue Mar 4 01:06:13 2025 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Peilin Ye X-Patchwork-Id: 13999704 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Received: from mail-oa1-f74.google.com (mail-oa1-f74.google.com [209.85.160.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9C74273FD for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 01:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.160.74 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741050380; cv=none; b=m4ssJGVsw+1b09qNTwumXzSG97VWoRQFGhu2H4BvsacGcZiRIBQXBhSh4E1CXSL8cubef93++9oe940K+h8xbtN2bQreJEIyL4Ds5UPEBisqlcwu+Qk+MYpUmcSV6Dl5VojHmNivsrvDVOv9EGrMj0FNOV9iepiZYq6y+mEFobs= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741050380; c=relaxed/simple; bh=U3s5HwsMmN6ex0whzKYQgficsfyiIZR5xyTe+2uvQAE=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=eYGnMOoCQ+RqM+6WINGD1BBitTKcPE9nfH7FLi3W23yCj8x2bFUtvP2iGw9Xrc8jnrlVmoCFlsI/4+EHyluiOAvJ1ZoIH4xUTpEIw3BOsPFDTLyiTaxY1zR4DtxbU17M/PQD4Up0eEF0gdI3VbN7iMa6UgTnxlHpbu+4NKWTW6E= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--yepeilin.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=nHdXDRxx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.160.74 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--yepeilin.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="nHdXDRxx" Received: by mail-oa1-f74.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2add2f6f16dso6962581fac.1 for ; Mon, 03 Mar 2025 17:06:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1741050377; x=1741655177; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9WvDNGg8mLBZCgeoc9LpwM5VS00kXRObWnWSaKq7L7c=; b=nHdXDRxxVbVdMdc1BZxld6OLpoMPj1+u0cQavUBk0BmV53GWsSVPZrVSWaNX8z/CTR hUUo6exFo2J6/uu5bN5yjPYnbmJiup1JJjBbCU1NV+xekwMlKLVwsTkgSQ5hkpepP+36 i3bsO7DV7AruwLBOdOyq+aY0jhrhPq2lUWMBlJOV0DwvDaK2p5xW73BVUcHUlFdZpG7i 6z2bBMSqtxOt02Jhmn41PcizT3ba5zI6xpMmdebFNKrRyPD2nyJ64No4hmqPZP7ku/B1 HAs93ugh37jEZEJmIm2EGES2jdjdaSQgSPF5ONRWghT7bUnR9RboX5hHdr5GFr+u3Jqx DI9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1741050377; x=1741655177; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9WvDNGg8mLBZCgeoc9LpwM5VS00kXRObWnWSaKq7L7c=; b=XiujZ3RV8GxKL1dO2OS2ydSTnP3cBvdo5FgBUvC7YecEjZbPAH8AK5NSugsEsVwEd4 fk9IktERhYci+j+dtY4AUibcaK8DMmmZeuWq12QPxfbpgqQHZbdgcvQ2R9MADamwj0JD DgVyXC80RbOZ5otI/Het9RiiDf9SxW/hGwou2u3HYK4CX1mlKNN8Qt0HRiiDRYL1F8o7 BNTL8TFMR73IIAwWioB0rK6fn2I3PT7I9CsnABhPnSXLGbh09ilOxx+5/+cKzQXrdqrM hQyy/LC3FgXinbRtNCa3d1Nyf2wTY5+Ytszx2Gdyj4t8F9mvejgr6BTrJw2cyE0sSKN9 vzdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxxmy+8NHz0w3xm7xTkAhL/h+61o9s6rbEDdwIy7iMdYLNfrUk1 3lMhbTE6CgFAY7earP8Dpdj7KMxuu4rahGX9Ct/4rvQ9SyJEPz68j1B5OozlqBSwaPIUgzRBelF kp9xKVBoESJY8qhpf63+Ai44FsoSUevCsjdP+o+IOR78LrDb9G0DNbR75gbORDzg8ZH3TVRPAQO voZo6EdKOBTU34Uyr/4TDlMeJx1+9a7AM6O9rfWrg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGTcuGBAs/Zn3J0PE4iFbnGvixoQD53Ymk5e85s+lEpFIzYgRQfHKtN3NKajxQg1Gzj7hPEiWF3oZQhzQ== X-Received: from oable14.prod.google.com ([2002:a05:6870:c0e:b0:2b8:514d:4c27]) (user=yepeilin job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a05:6871:58b:b0:2b8:78c0:2592 with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2c17847cbecmr9260193fac.23.1741050376725; Mon, 03 Mar 2025 17:06:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 01:06:13 +0000 In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.48.1.711.g2feabab25a-goog Message-ID: Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/6] bpf: Introduce load-acquire and store-release instructions From: Peilin Ye To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Peilin Ye , bpf@ietf.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Xu Kuohai , Eduard Zingerman , David Vernet , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Jonathan Corbet , "Paul E. McKenney" , Puranjay Mohan , Ilya Leoshkevich , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Quentin Monnet , Mykola Lysenko , Shuah Khan , Ihor Solodrai , Yingchi Long , Josh Don , Barret Rhoden , Neel Natu , Benjamin Segall , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Introduce BPF instructions with load-acquire and store-release semantics, as discussed in [1]. Define 2 new flags: #define BPF_LOAD_ACQ 0x100 #define BPF_STORE_REL 0x110 A "load-acquire" is a BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC instruction with the 'imm' field set to BPF_LOAD_ACQ (0x100). Similarly, a "store-release" is a BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC instruction with the 'imm' field set to BPF_STORE_REL (0x110). Unlike existing atomic read-modify-write operations that only support BPF_W (32-bit) and BPF_DW (64-bit) size modifiers, load-acquires and store-releases also support BPF_B (8-bit) and BPF_H (16-bit). As an exception, however, 64-bit load-acquires/store-releases are not supported on 32-bit architectures (to fix a build error reported by the kernel test robot). An 8- or 16-bit load-acquire zero-extends the value before writing it to a 32-bit register, just like ARM64 instruction LDARH and friends. Similar to existing atomic read-modify-write operations, misaligned load-acquires/store-releases are not allowed (even if BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT is set). As an example, consider the following 64-bit load-acquire BPF instruction (assuming little-endian): db 10 00 00 00 01 00 00 r0 = load_acquire((u64 *)(r1 + 0x0)) opcode (0xdb): BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW | BPF_STX imm (0x00000100): BPF_LOAD_ACQ Similarly, a 16-bit BPF store-release: cb 21 00 00 10 01 00 00 store_release((u16 *)(r1 + 0x0), w2) opcode (0xcb): BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_H | BPF_STX imm (0x00000110): BPF_STORE_REL In arch/{arm64,s390,x86}/net/bpf_jit_comp.c, have bpf_jit_supports_insn(..., /*in_arena=*/true) return false for the new instructions, until the corresponding JIT compiler supports them in arena. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240729183246.4110549-1-yepeilin@google.com/ Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich Cc: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye --- arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 4 ++ arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 14 +++++-- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 4 ++ include/linux/bpf.h | 15 ++++++++ include/linux/filter.h | 2 + include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 3 ++ kernel/bpf/core.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- kernel/bpf/disasm.c | 12 ++++++ kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 3 ++ 10 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 7409c8acbde3..bdda5a77bb16 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -2667,8 +2667,12 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn, bool in_arena) if (!in_arena) return true; switch (insn->code) { + case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_B: + case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_H: case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W: case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW: + if (bpf_atomic_is_load_store(insn)) + return false; if (!cpus_have_cap(ARM64_HAS_LSE_ATOMICS)) return false; } diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 9d440a0b729e..0776dfde2dba 100644 --- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -2919,10 +2919,16 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_arena(void) bool bpf_jit_supports_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn, bool in_arena) { - /* - * Currently the verifier uses this function only to check which - * atomic stores to arena are supported, and they all are. - */ + if (!in_arena) + return true; + switch (insn->code) { + case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_B: + case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_H: + case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W: + case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW: + if (bpf_atomic_is_load_store(insn)) + return false; + } return true; } diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index a43fc5af973d..f0c31c940fb8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -3771,8 +3771,12 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn, bool in_arena) if (!in_arena) return true; switch (insn->code) { + case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_B: + case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_H: case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W: case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW: + if (bpf_atomic_is_load_store(insn)) + return false; if (insn->imm == (BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH) || insn->imm == (BPF_OR | BPF_FETCH) || insn->imm == (BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH)) diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 4c4028d865ee..b556a26d8150 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -991,6 +991,21 @@ static inline bool bpf_pseudo_func(const struct bpf_insn *insn) return bpf_is_ldimm64(insn) && insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC; } +/* Given a BPF_ATOMIC instruction @atomic_insn, return true if it is an + * atomic load or store, and false if it is a read-modify-write instruction. + */ +static inline bool +bpf_atomic_is_load_store(const struct bpf_insn *atomic_insn) +{ + switch (atomic_insn->imm) { + case BPF_LOAD_ACQ: + case BPF_STORE_REL: + return true; + default: + return false; + } +} + struct bpf_prog_ops { int (*test_run)(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr); diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h index 3ed6eb9e7c73..24e94afb5622 100644 --- a/include/linux/filter.h +++ b/include/linux/filter.h @@ -364,6 +364,8 @@ static inline bool insn_is_cast_user(const struct bpf_insn *insn) * BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH src_reg = atomic_fetch_xor(dst_reg + off16, src_reg); * BPF_XCHG src_reg = atomic_xchg(dst_reg + off16, src_reg) * BPF_CMPXCHG r0 = atomic_cmpxchg(dst_reg + off16, r0, src_reg) + * BPF_LOAD_ACQ dst_reg = smp_load_acquire(src_reg + off16) + * BPF_STORE_REL smp_store_release(dst_reg + off16, src_reg) */ #define BPF_ATOMIC_OP(SIZE, OP, DST, SRC, OFF) \ diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index beac5cdf2d2c..bb37897c0393 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ #define BPF_XCHG (0xe0 | BPF_FETCH) /* atomic exchange */ #define BPF_CMPXCHG (0xf0 | BPF_FETCH) /* atomic compare-and-write */ +#define BPF_LOAD_ACQ 0x100 /* load-acquire */ +#define BPF_STORE_REL 0x110 /* store-release */ + enum bpf_cond_pseudo_jmp { BPF_MAY_GOTO = 0, }; diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index a0200fbbace9..6df1d3e379a4 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -1663,14 +1663,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__bpf_call_base); INSN_3(JMP, JSET, K), \ INSN_2(JMP, JA), \ INSN_2(JMP32, JA), \ + /* Atomic operations. */ \ + INSN_3(STX, ATOMIC, B), \ + INSN_3(STX, ATOMIC, H), \ + INSN_3(STX, ATOMIC, W), \ + INSN_3(STX, ATOMIC, DW), \ /* Store instructions. */ \ /* Register based. */ \ INSN_3(STX, MEM, B), \ INSN_3(STX, MEM, H), \ INSN_3(STX, MEM, W), \ INSN_3(STX, MEM, DW), \ - INSN_3(STX, ATOMIC, W), \ - INSN_3(STX, ATOMIC, DW), \ /* Immediate based. */ \ INSN_3(ST, MEM, B), \ INSN_3(ST, MEM, H), \ @@ -2152,24 +2155,33 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn) if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_W) \ atomic_##KOP((u32) SRC, (atomic_t *)(unsigned long) \ (DST + insn->off)); \ - else \ + else if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW) \ atomic64_##KOP((u64) SRC, (atomic64_t *)(unsigned long) \ (DST + insn->off)); \ + else \ + goto default_label; \ break; \ case BOP | BPF_FETCH: \ if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_W) \ SRC = (u32) atomic_fetch_##KOP( \ (u32) SRC, \ (atomic_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off)); \ - else \ + else if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW) \ SRC = (u64) atomic64_fetch_##KOP( \ (u64) SRC, \ (atomic64_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off)); \ + else \ + goto default_label; \ break; STX_ATOMIC_DW: STX_ATOMIC_W: + STX_ATOMIC_H: + STX_ATOMIC_B: switch (IMM) { + /* Atomic read-modify-write instructions support only W and DW + * size modifiers. + */ ATOMIC_ALU_OP(BPF_ADD, add) ATOMIC_ALU_OP(BPF_AND, and) ATOMIC_ALU_OP(BPF_OR, or) @@ -2181,20 +2193,63 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn) SRC = (u32) atomic_xchg( (atomic_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off), (u32) SRC); - else + else if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW) SRC = (u64) atomic64_xchg( (atomic64_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off), (u64) SRC); + else + goto default_label; break; case BPF_CMPXCHG: if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_W) BPF_R0 = (u32) atomic_cmpxchg( (atomic_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off), (u32) BPF_R0, (u32) SRC); - else + else if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW) BPF_R0 = (u64) atomic64_cmpxchg( (atomic64_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off), (u64) BPF_R0, (u64) SRC); + else + goto default_label; + break; + /* Atomic load and store instructions support all size + * modifiers. + */ + case BPF_LOAD_ACQ: + switch (BPF_SIZE(insn->code)) { +#define LOAD_ACQUIRE(SIZEOP, SIZE) \ + case BPF_##SIZEOP: \ + DST = (SIZE)smp_load_acquire( \ + (SIZE *)(unsigned long)(SRC + insn->off)); \ + break; + LOAD_ACQUIRE(B, u8) + LOAD_ACQUIRE(H, u16) + LOAD_ACQUIRE(W, u32) +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT + LOAD_ACQUIRE(DW, u64) +#endif +#undef LOAD_ACQUIRE + default: + goto default_label; + } + break; + case BPF_STORE_REL: + switch (BPF_SIZE(insn->code)) { +#define STORE_RELEASE(SIZEOP, SIZE) \ + case BPF_##SIZEOP: \ + smp_store_release( \ + (SIZE *)(unsigned long)(DST + insn->off), (SIZE)SRC); \ + break; + STORE_RELEASE(B, u8) + STORE_RELEASE(H, u16) + STORE_RELEASE(W, u32) +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT + STORE_RELEASE(DW, u64) +#endif +#undef STORE_RELEASE + default: + goto default_label; + } break; default: diff --git a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c index 309c4aa1b026..974d172d6735 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c @@ -267,6 +267,18 @@ void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_insn_cbs *cbs, BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW ? "64" : "", bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], insn->dst_reg, insn->off, insn->src_reg); + } else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC && + insn->imm == BPF_LOAD_ACQ) { + verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) r%d = load_acquire((%s *)(r%d %+d))\n", + insn->code, insn->dst_reg, + bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], + insn->src_reg, insn->off); + } else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC && + insn->imm == BPF_STORE_REL) { + verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) store_release((%s *)(r%d %+d), r%d)\n", + insn->code, + bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], + insn->dst_reg, insn->off, insn->src_reg); } else { verbose(cbs->private_data, "BUG_%02x\n", insn->code); } diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 22c4edc8695c..b9ffe2ef66fe 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -579,6 +579,13 @@ static bool is_cmpxchg_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn) insn->imm == BPF_CMPXCHG; } +static bool is_atomic_load_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn) +{ + return BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_STX && + BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC && + insn->imm == BPF_LOAD_ACQ; +} + static int __get_spi(s32 off) { return (-off - 1) / BPF_REG_SIZE; @@ -3567,7 +3574,7 @@ static bool is_reg64(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn, } if (class == BPF_STX) { - /* BPF_STX (including atomic variants) has multiple source + /* BPF_STX (including atomic variants) has one or more source * operands, one of which is a ptr. Check whether the caller is * asking about it. */ @@ -4181,7 +4188,7 @@ static int backtrack_insn(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int idx, int subseq_idx, * dreg still needs precision before this insn */ } - } else if (class == BPF_LDX) { + } else if (class == BPF_LDX || is_atomic_load_insn(insn)) { if (!bt_is_reg_set(bt, dreg)) return 0; bt_clear_reg(bt, dreg); @@ -7766,6 +7773,32 @@ static int check_atomic_rmw(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return 0; } +static int check_atomic_load(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_insn *insn) +{ + if (!atomic_ptr_type_ok(env, insn->src_reg, insn)) { + verbose(env, "BPF_ATOMIC loads from R%d %s is not allowed\n", + insn->src_reg, + reg_type_str(env, reg_state(env, insn->src_reg)->type)); + return -EACCES; + } + + return check_load_mem(env, insn, true, false, false, "atomic_load"); +} + +static int check_atomic_store(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_insn *insn) +{ + if (!atomic_ptr_type_ok(env, insn->dst_reg, insn)) { + verbose(env, "BPF_ATOMIC stores into R%d %s is not allowed\n", + insn->dst_reg, + reg_type_str(env, reg_state(env, insn->dst_reg)->type)); + return -EACCES; + } + + return check_store_reg(env, insn, true); +} + static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) { switch (insn->imm) { @@ -7780,6 +7813,20 @@ static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) case BPF_XCHG: case BPF_CMPXCHG: return check_atomic_rmw(env, insn); + case BPF_LOAD_ACQ: + if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW && BITS_PER_LONG != 64) { + verbose(env, + "64-bit load-acquires are only supported on 64-bit arches\n"); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + return check_atomic_load(env, insn); + case BPF_STORE_REL: + if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW && BITS_PER_LONG != 64) { + verbose(env, + "64-bit store-releases are only supported on 64-bit arches\n"); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + return check_atomic_store(env, insn); default: verbose(env, "BPF_ATOMIC uses invalid atomic opcode %02x\n", insn->imm); @@ -20605,7 +20652,9 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) insn->code == (BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_W) || insn->code == (BPF_ST | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW)) { type = BPF_WRITE; - } else if ((insn->code == (BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W) || + } else if ((insn->code == (BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_B) || + insn->code == (BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_H) || + insn->code == (BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W) || insn->code == (BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW)) && env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].ptr_type == PTR_TO_ARENA) { insn->code = BPF_STX | BPF_PROBE_ATOMIC | BPF_SIZE(insn->code); diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index beac5cdf2d2c..bb37897c0393 100644 --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ #define BPF_XCHG (0xe0 | BPF_FETCH) /* atomic exchange */ #define BPF_CMPXCHG (0xf0 | BPF_FETCH) /* atomic compare-and-write */ +#define BPF_LOAD_ACQ 0x100 /* load-acquire */ +#define BPF_STORE_REL 0x110 /* store-release */ + enum bpf_cond_pseudo_jmp { BPF_MAY_GOTO = 0, };