diff mbox series

[net-next,v3,1/2] bnxt_en: ethtool: Remove ip4/ip6 ntuple support for IPPROTO_RAW

Message ID a5ba0d3bd926d27977c317efa7fdfbc8a704d2b8.1730778566.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 050eb2cebb9e97adb673550c51988c3de1eb0834
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series bnxt_en: ethtool: Improve wildcard l4proto on ip4/ip6 ntuple rules | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 6 of 6 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 5 this patch: 5
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 48 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/contest success net-next-2024-11-06--12-00 (tests: 782)

Commit Message

Daniel Xu Nov. 5, 2024, 4:13 a.m. UTC 
Commit 9ba0e56199e3 ("bnxt_en: Enhance ethtool ntuple support for ip
flows besides TCP/UDP") added support for ip4/ip6 ntuple rules.
However, if you wanted to wildcard over l4proto, you had to provide
0xFF.

The choice of 0xFF is non-standard and non-intuitive. Delete support for
it in this commit. Next commit we will introduce a cleaner way to
wildcard l4proto.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
---
 .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c | 21 ++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Comments

Michael Chan Nov. 5, 2024, 5:36 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 8:13 PM Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz> wrote:
>
> Commit 9ba0e56199e3 ("bnxt_en: Enhance ethtool ntuple support for ip
> flows besides TCP/UDP") added support for ip4/ip6 ntuple rules.
> However, if you wanted to wildcard over l4proto, you had to provide
> 0xFF.
>
> The choice of 0xFF is non-standard and non-intuitive. Delete support for
> it in this commit. Next commit we will introduce a cleaner way to
> wildcard l4proto.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>

Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c
index 6ef06579df53..41160aed9476 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c
@@ -1124,14 +1124,10 @@  static int bnxt_grxclsrule(struct bnxt *bp, struct ethtool_rxnfc *cmd)
 	fkeys = &fltr->fkeys;
 	fmasks = &fltr->fmasks;
 	if (fkeys->basic.n_proto == htons(ETH_P_IP)) {
-		if (fkeys->basic.ip_proto == IPPROTO_ICMP ||
-		    fkeys->basic.ip_proto == IPPROTO_RAW) {
+		if (fkeys->basic.ip_proto == IPPROTO_ICMP) {
 			fs->flow_type = IP_USER_FLOW;
 			fs->h_u.usr_ip4_spec.ip_ver = ETH_RX_NFC_IP4;
-			if (fkeys->basic.ip_proto == IPPROTO_ICMP)
-				fs->h_u.usr_ip4_spec.proto = IPPROTO_ICMP;
-			else
-				fs->h_u.usr_ip4_spec.proto = IPPROTO_RAW;
+			fs->h_u.usr_ip4_spec.proto = IPPROTO_ICMP;
 			fs->m_u.usr_ip4_spec.proto = BNXT_IP_PROTO_FULL_MASK;
 		} else if (fkeys->basic.ip_proto == IPPROTO_TCP) {
 			fs->flow_type = TCP_V4_FLOW;
@@ -1153,13 +1149,9 @@  static int bnxt_grxclsrule(struct bnxt *bp, struct ethtool_rxnfc *cmd)
 			fs->m_u.tcp_ip4_spec.pdst = fmasks->ports.dst;
 		}
 	} else {
-		if (fkeys->basic.ip_proto == IPPROTO_ICMPV6 ||
-		    fkeys->basic.ip_proto == IPPROTO_RAW) {
+		if (fkeys->basic.ip_proto == IPPROTO_ICMPV6) {
 			fs->flow_type = IPV6_USER_FLOW;
-			if (fkeys->basic.ip_proto == IPPROTO_ICMPV6)
-				fs->h_u.usr_ip6_spec.l4_proto = IPPROTO_ICMPV6;
-			else
-				fs->h_u.usr_ip6_spec.l4_proto = IPPROTO_RAW;
+			fs->h_u.usr_ip6_spec.l4_proto = IPPROTO_ICMPV6;
 			fs->m_u.usr_ip6_spec.l4_proto = BNXT_IP_PROTO_FULL_MASK;
 		} else if (fkeys->basic.ip_proto == IPPROTO_TCP) {
 			fs->flow_type = TCP_V6_FLOW;
@@ -1285,7 +1277,7 @@  static bool bnxt_verify_ntuple_ip4_flow(struct ethtool_usrip4_spec *ip_spec,
 	if (ip_mask->l4_4_bytes || ip_mask->tos ||
 	    ip_spec->ip_ver != ETH_RX_NFC_IP4 ||
 	    ip_mask->proto != BNXT_IP_PROTO_FULL_MASK ||
-	    (ip_spec->proto != IPPROTO_RAW && ip_spec->proto != IPPROTO_ICMP))
+	    ip_spec->proto != IPPROTO_ICMP)
 		return false;
 	return true;
 }
@@ -1295,8 +1287,7 @@  static bool bnxt_verify_ntuple_ip6_flow(struct ethtool_usrip6_spec *ip_spec,
 {
 	if (ip_mask->l4_4_bytes || ip_mask->tclass ||
 	    ip_mask->l4_proto != BNXT_IP_PROTO_FULL_MASK ||
-	    (ip_spec->l4_proto != IPPROTO_RAW &&
-	     ip_spec->l4_proto != IPPROTO_ICMPV6))
+	    ip_spec->l4_proto != IPPROTO_ICMPV6)
 		return false;
 	return true;
 }