| Message ID | aafc654d-5b42-aa18-bf74-f5277d549f73@sberdevices.ru (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | vsock: updates for SO_RCVLOWAT handling | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| netdev/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be net-next |
| netdev/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag not required for -next series |
| netdev/subject_prefix | success | Link |
| netdev/cover_letter | success | Series has a cover letter |
| netdev/patch_count | success | Link |
| netdev/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
| netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/cc_maintainers | success | CCed 7 of 7 maintainers |
| netdev/build_clang | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
| netdev/check_selftest | success | No net selftest shell script |
| netdev/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
| netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 10 lines checked |
| netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 07:56:59AM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: >Both bits indicate, that next data read call won't be blocked, but when >sk_rcvlowat is not 1, these bits will be set by poll anyway, thus when >user tries to dequeue data,it will wait until sk_rcvlowat bytes of data >will be available. > The patch LGTM, but I suggest you to rewrite the title and commit of the message to better explain what this patch does (pass sock_rcvlowat to notify_poll_in as target) and then explain why as you already did (to set POLLIN/POLLRDNORM only when target is reached). Thanks, Stefano >Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru> >--- > net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c >index f04abf662ec6..63a13fa2686a 100644 >--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c >+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c >@@ -1066,8 +1066,9 @@ static __poll_t vsock_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock, > if (transport && transport->stream_is_active(vsk) && > !(sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)) { > bool data_ready_now = false; >+ int target = sock_rcvlowat(sk, 0, INT_MAX); > int ret = transport->notify_poll_in( >- vsk, 1, &data_ready_now); >+ vsk, target, &data_ready_now); > if (ret < 0) { > mask |= EPOLLERR; > } else { >-- >2.25.1
On 27.07.2022 15:17, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 07:56:59AM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: >> Both bits indicate, that next data read call won't be blocked, but when >> sk_rcvlowat is not 1, these bits will be set by poll anyway, thus when >> user tries to dequeue data,it will wait until sk_rcvlowat bytes of data >> will be available. >> > > The patch LGTM, but I suggest you to rewrite the title and commit of the message to better explain what this patch does (pass sock_rcvlowat to notify_poll_in as target) and then explain why as you already did (to set POLLIN/POLLRDNORM only when target is reached). Ok, i see. Ack > > Thanks, > Stefano > >> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru> >> --- >> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 3 ++- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c >> index f04abf662ec6..63a13fa2686a 100644 >> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c >> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c >> @@ -1066,8 +1066,9 @@ static __poll_t vsock_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock, >> if (transport && transport->stream_is_active(vsk) && >> !(sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)) { >> bool data_ready_now = false; >> + int target = sock_rcvlowat(sk, 0, INT_MAX); >> int ret = transport->notify_poll_in( >> - vsk, 1, &data_ready_now); >> + vsk, target, &data_ready_now); >> if (ret < 0) { >> mask |= EPOLLERR; >> } else { >> -- >> 2.25.1 >
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c index f04abf662ec6..63a13fa2686a 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c @@ -1066,8 +1066,9 @@ static __poll_t vsock_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock, if (transport && transport->stream_is_active(vsk) && !(sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)) { bool data_ready_now = false; + int target = sock_rcvlowat(sk, 0, INT_MAX); int ret = transport->notify_poll_in( - vsk, 1, &data_ready_now); + vsk, target, &data_ready_now); if (ret < 0) { mask |= EPOLLERR; } else {
Both bits indicate, that next data read call won't be blocked, but when sk_rcvlowat is not 1, these bits will be set by poll anyway, thus when user tries to dequeue data,it will wait until sk_rcvlowat bytes of data will be available. Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru> --- net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)