@@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_parse_match(struct efx_nic *efx,
BIT(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_KEYID) |
BIT(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_IPV4_ADDRS) |
BIT(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_IPV6_ADDRS) |
+ BIT(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_IP) |
BIT(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_PORTS) |
BIT(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_CONTROL) |
BIT(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_TCP) |
@@ -346,20 +347,47 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_parse_match(struct efx_nic *efx,
return 0;
}
+static void efx_tc_flower_release_encap_match(struct efx_nic *efx,
+ struct efx_tc_encap_match *encap)
+{
+ int rc;
+
+ if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&encap->ref))
+ return; /* still in use */
+
+ if (encap->type == EFX_TC_EM_DIRECT) {
+ rc = efx_mae_unregister_encap_match(efx, encap);
+ if (rc)
+ /* Display message but carry on and remove entry from our
+ * SW tables, because there's not much we can do about it.
+ */
+ netif_err(efx, drv, efx->net_dev,
+ "Failed to release encap match %#x, rc %d\n",
+ encap->fw_id, rc);
+ }
+ rhashtable_remove_fast(&efx->tc->encap_match_ht, &encap->linkage,
+ efx_tc_encap_match_ht_params);
+ if (encap->pseudo)
+ efx_tc_flower_release_encap_match(efx, encap->pseudo);
+ kfree(encap);
+}
+
static int efx_tc_flower_record_encap_match(struct efx_nic *efx,
struct efx_tc_match *match,
enum efx_encap_type type,
+ enum efx_tc_em_pseudo_type em_type,
+ u8 child_ip_tos_mask,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
- struct efx_tc_encap_match *encap, *old;
+ struct efx_tc_encap_match *encap, *old, *pseudo = NULL;
bool ipv6 = false;
int rc;
/* We require that the socket-defining fields (IP addrs and UDP dest
- * port) are present and exact-match. Other fields are currently not
- * allowed. This meets what OVS will ask for, and means that we don't
- * need to handle difficult checks for overlapping matches as could
- * come up if we allowed masks or varying sets of match fields.
+ * port) are present and exact-match. Other fields may only be used
+ * if the field-set (and any masks) are the same for all encap
+ * matches on the same <sip,dip,dport> tuple; this is enforced by
+ * pseudo encap matches.
*/
if (match->mask.enc_dst_ip | match->mask.enc_src_ip) {
if (!IS_ALL_ONES(match->mask.enc_dst_ip)) {
@@ -402,21 +430,37 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_record_encap_match(struct efx_nic *efx,
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
if (match->mask.enc_ip_tos) {
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Egress encap match on IP ToS not supported");
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ struct efx_tc_match pmatch = *match;
+
+ if (em_type == EFX_TC_EM_PSEUDO_MASK) { /* can't happen */
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Bad recursion in egress encap match handler");
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+ pmatch.value.enc_ip_tos = 0;
+ pmatch.mask.enc_ip_tos = 0;
+ rc = efx_tc_flower_record_encap_match(efx, &pmatch, type,
+ EFX_TC_EM_PSEUDO_MASK,
+ match->mask.enc_ip_tos,
+ extack);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+ pseudo = pmatch.encap;
}
if (match->mask.enc_ip_ttl) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Egress encap match on IP TTL not supported");
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ goto fail_pseudo;
}
rc = efx_mae_check_encap_match_caps(efx, ipv6, match->mask.enc_ip_tos, extack);
if (rc)
- return rc;
+ goto fail_pseudo;
encap = kzalloc(sizeof(*encap), GFP_USER);
- if (!encap)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!encap) {
+ rc = -ENOMEM;
+ goto fail_pseudo;
+ }
encap->src_ip = match->value.enc_src_ip;
encap->dst_ip = match->value.enc_dst_ip;
#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6
@@ -425,12 +469,56 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_record_encap_match(struct efx_nic *efx,
#endif
encap->udp_dport = match->value.enc_dport;
encap->tun_type = type;
+ encap->ip_tos = match->value.enc_ip_tos;
+ encap->ip_tos_mask = match->mask.enc_ip_tos;
+ encap->child_ip_tos_mask = child_ip_tos_mask;
+ encap->type = em_type;
+ encap->pseudo = pseudo;
old = rhashtable_lookup_get_insert_fast(&efx->tc->encap_match_ht,
&encap->linkage,
efx_tc_encap_match_ht_params);
if (old) {
/* don't need our new entry */
kfree(encap);
+ if (pseudo) /* don't need our new pseudo either */
+ efx_tc_flower_release_encap_match(efx, pseudo);
+ /* check old and new em_types are compatible */
+ switch (old->type) {
+ case EFX_TC_EM_DIRECT:
+ /* old EM is in hardware, so mustn't overlap with a
+ * pseudo, but may be shared with another direct EM
+ */
+ if (em_type == EFX_TC_EM_DIRECT)
+ break;
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Pseudo encap match conflicts with existing direct entry");
+ return -EEXIST;
+ case EFX_TC_EM_PSEUDO_MASK:
+ /* old EM is protecting a ToS-qualified filter, so may
+ * only be shared with another pseudo for the same
+ * ToS mask.
+ */
+ if (em_type != EFX_TC_EM_PSEUDO_MASK) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+ "%s encap match conflicts with existing pseudo(MASK) entry",
+ encap->type ? "Pseudo" : "Direct");
+ return -EEXIST;
+ }
+ if (child_ip_tos_mask != old->child_ip_tos_mask) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+ "Pseudo encap match for TOS mask %#04x conflicts with existing pseudo(MASK) entry for TOS mask %#04x",
+ child_ip_tos_mask,
+ old->child_ip_tos_mask);
+ return -EEXIST;
+ }
+ break;
+ default: /* Unrecognised pseudo-type. Just say no */
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+ "%s encap match conflicts with existing pseudo(%d) entry",
+ encap->type ? "Pseudo" : "Direct",
+ old->type);
+ return -EEXIST;
+ }
+ /* check old and new tun_types are compatible */
if (old->tun_type != type) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
"Egress encap match with conflicting tun_type %u != %u",
@@ -442,10 +530,12 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_record_encap_match(struct efx_nic *efx,
/* existing entry found */
encap = old;
} else {
- rc = efx_mae_register_encap_match(efx, encap);
- if (rc) {
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to record egress encap match in HW");
- goto fail;
+ if (em_type == EFX_TC_EM_DIRECT) {
+ rc = efx_mae_register_encap_match(efx, encap);
+ if (rc) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to record egress encap match in HW");
+ goto fail;
+ }
}
refcount_set(&encap->ref, 1);
}
@@ -455,30 +545,12 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_record_encap_match(struct efx_nic *efx,
rhashtable_remove_fast(&efx->tc->encap_match_ht, &encap->linkage,
efx_tc_encap_match_ht_params);
kfree(encap);
+fail_pseudo:
+ if (pseudo)
+ efx_tc_flower_release_encap_match(efx, pseudo);
return rc;
}
-static void efx_tc_flower_release_encap_match(struct efx_nic *efx,
- struct efx_tc_encap_match *encap)
-{
- int rc;
-
- if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&encap->ref))
- return; /* still in use */
-
- rc = efx_mae_unregister_encap_match(efx, encap);
- if (rc)
- /* Display message but carry on and remove entry from our
- * SW tables, because there's not much we can do about it.
- */
- netif_err(efx, drv, efx->net_dev,
- "Failed to release encap match %#x, rc %d\n",
- encap->fw_id, rc);
- rhashtable_remove_fast(&efx->tc->encap_match_ht, &encap->linkage,
- efx_tc_encap_match_ht_params);
- kfree(encap);
-}
-
static void efx_tc_delete_rule(struct efx_nic *efx, struct efx_tc_flow_rule *rule)
{
efx_mae_delete_rule(efx, rule->fw_id);
@@ -632,6 +704,7 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_replace_foreign(struct efx_nic *efx,
}
rc = efx_tc_flower_record_encap_match(efx, &match, type,
+ EFX_TC_EM_DIRECT, 0,
extack);
if (rc)
goto release;
@@ -74,6 +74,27 @@ static inline bool efx_tc_match_is_encap(const struct efx_tc_match_fields *mask)
mask->enc_ip_ttl || mask->enc_sport || mask->enc_dport;
}
+/**
+ * enum efx_tc_em_pseudo_type - &struct efx_tc_encap_match pseudo type
+ *
+ * These are used to classify "pseudo" encap matches, which don't refer
+ * to an entry in hardware but rather indicate that a section of the
+ * match space is in use by another Outer Rule.
+ *
+ * @EFX_TC_EM_DIRECT: real HW entry in Outer Rule table; not a pseudo.
+ * Hardware index in &struct efx_tc_encap_match.fw_id is valid.
+ * @EFX_TC_EM_PSEUDO_MASK: registered by an encap match which includes a
+ * match on an optional field (currently only ip_tos), to prevent an
+ * overlapping encap match _without_ optional fields.
+ * The pseudo encap match may be referenced again by an encap match
+ * with a different ip_tos value, but all ip_tos_mask must match the
+ * first (stored in our child_ip_tos_mask).
+ */
+enum efx_tc_em_pseudo_type {
+ EFX_TC_EM_DIRECT,
+ EFX_TC_EM_PSEUDO_MASK,
+};
+
struct efx_tc_encap_match {
__be32 src_ip, dst_ip;
struct in6_addr src_ip6, dst_ip6;
@@ -81,8 +102,11 @@ struct efx_tc_encap_match {
u8 ip_tos, ip_tos_mask;
struct rhash_head linkage;
enum efx_encap_type tun_type;
+ u8 child_ip_tos_mask;
refcount_t ref;
+ enum efx_tc_em_pseudo_type type;
u32 fw_id; /* index of this entry in firmware encap match table */
+ struct efx_tc_encap_match *pseudo; /* Referenced pseudo EM if needed */
};
struct efx_tc_match {