diff mbox series

[net-next,v4,8/9] vmci/vsock: check SO_RCVLOWAT before wake up reader

Message ID af99d280-b525-5729-5eba-2fd67b9a9b67@sberdevices.ru (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit e061aed99855ccef2d64f5bdd66996e19d6cf60b
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series vsock: updates for SO_RCVLOWAT handling | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 170 this patch: 170
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 7 of 7 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 170 this patch: 170
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 24 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Arseniy Krasnov Aug. 19, 2022, 5:41 a.m. UTC 
This adds extra condition to wake up data reader: do it only when number
of readable bytes >= SO_RCVLOWAT. Otherwise, there is no sense to kick
user, because it will wait until SO_RCVLOWAT bytes will be dequeued. This
check is performed in vsock_data_ready().

Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
Reviewed-by: Vishnu Dasa <vdasa@vmware.com>
---
 net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c        | 2 +-
 net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c
index 852097e2b9e6..7c3a7db134b2 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify.c
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@  vmci_transport_handle_wrote(struct sock *sk,
 	struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
 	PKT_FIELD(vsk, sent_waiting_read) = false;
 #endif
-	sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
+	vsock_data_ready(sk);
 }
 
 static void vmci_transport_notify_pkt_socket_init(struct sock *sk)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c
index 12f0cb8fe998..e96a88d850a8 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@  vmci_transport_handle_wrote(struct sock *sk,
 			    bool bottom_half,
 			    struct sockaddr_vm *dst, struct sockaddr_vm *src)
 {
-	sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
+	vsock_data_ready(sk);
 }
 
 static void vsock_block_update_write_window(struct sock *sk)
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@  vmci_transport_notify_pkt_recv_post_dequeue(
 		/* See the comment in
 		 * vmci_transport_notify_pkt_send_post_enqueue().
 		 */
-		sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
+		vsock_data_ready(sk);
 	}
 
 	return err;