diff mbox series

[ipsec-rc] xfrm: replay: Fix the update of replay_esn->oseq_hi for GSO

Message ID d364e4f9c5f04ed83b777b96e6e1b48f11cb34cf.1731413249.git.leon@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Awaiting Upstream
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [ipsec-rc] xfrm: replay: Fix the update of replay_esn->oseq_hi for GSO | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format warning Single patches do not need cover letters; Target tree name not specified in the subject
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 4 maintainers not CCed: kuba@kernel.org edumazet@google.com horms@kernel.org pabeni@redhat.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 3 this patch: 3
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 13 this patch: 13
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 16 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Leon Romanovsky Nov. 12, 2024, 12:10 p.m. UTC
From: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>

When skb needs GSO and wrap around happens, if xo->seq.low (seqno of
the first skb segment) is before the last seq number but oseq (seqno
of the last segment) is after it, xo->seq.low is still bigger than
replay_esn->oseq while oseq is smaller than it, so the update of
replay_esn->oseq_hi is missed for this case wrap around because of
the change in the cited commit.

For example, if sending a packet with gso_segs=3 while old
replay_esn->oseq=0xfffffffe, we calculate:
    xo->seq.low = 0xfffffffe + 1 = 0x0xffffffff
    oseq = 0xfffffffe + 3 = 0x1
(oseq < replay_esn->oseq) is true, but (xo->seq.low <
replay_esn->oseq) is false, so replay_esn->oseq_hi is not incremented.

To fix this issue, change the outer checking back for the update of
replay_esn->oseq_hi. And add new checking inside for the update of
packet's oseq_hi.

Fixes: 4b549ccce941 ("xfrm: replay: Fix ESN wrap around for GSO")
Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c
index bc56c6305725..235bbefc2aba 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c
@@ -714,10 +714,12 @@  static int xfrm_replay_overflow_offload_esn(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff
 			oseq += skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs;
 		}
 
-		if (unlikely(xo->seq.low < replay_esn->oseq)) {
-			XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq.output.hi = ++oseq_hi;
-			xo->seq.hi = oseq_hi;
-			replay_esn->oseq_hi = oseq_hi;
+		if (unlikely(oseq < replay_esn->oseq)) {
+			replay_esn->oseq_hi = ++oseq_hi;
+			if (xo->seq.low < replay_esn->oseq) {
+				XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq.output.hi = oseq_hi;
+				xo->seq.hi = oseq_hi;
+			}
 			if (replay_esn->oseq_hi == 0) {
 				replay_esn->oseq--;
 				replay_esn->oseq_hi--;