diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2,2/6] selftests/bpf: Skip ENOTSUPP in ASSERT_OK

Message ID f6773559686a553269d84870eb23142e2dc1dc8c.1720146231.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series skip ENOTSUPP BPF selftests | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 17 of 17 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code, prefer EOPNOTSUPP
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Geliang Tang July 5, 2024, 2:38 a.m. UTC
From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

Just like handling ENOTSUPP in test_lsm_cgroup_functional(), this patch
adds a new helper test_progs_get_error() to check whether the input error
is ENOTSUPP (524) or ENOTSUP (95). If it is, invoke test__skip() to skip
the test instead of using test__fail().

Use this helper in ASSERT_OK() before invoking CHECK() macro.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c     |  6 +----
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h      | 23 +++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Andrii Nakryiko July 8, 2024, 6:54 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 7:38 PM Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
>
> Just like handling ENOTSUPP in test_lsm_cgroup_functional(), this patch
> adds a new helper test_progs_get_error() to check whether the input error
> is ENOTSUPP (524) or ENOTSUP (95). If it is, invoke test__skip() to skip
> the test instead of using test__fail().
>
> Use this helper in ASSERT_OK() before invoking CHECK() macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c     |  6 +----
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h      | 23 +++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>

I haven't followed these patch sets, but no, let's not add magical
special error codes handling into ASSERT_xxx() macros.

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c
> index 6df25de8f080..6511f5f4a00f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c
> @@ -102,12 +102,8 @@ static void test_lsm_cgroup_functional(void)
>         ASSERT_EQ(query_prog_cnt(cgroup_fd, "bpf_lsm_sk_alloc_security"), 0, "prog count");
>         ASSERT_EQ(query_prog_cnt(cgroup_fd, NULL), 0, "total prog count");
>         err = bpf_prog_attach(alloc_prog_fd, cgroup_fd, BPF_LSM_CGROUP, 0);
> -       if (err == -ENOTSUPP) {
> -               test__skip();
> -               goto close_cgroup;
> -       }
>         if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "attach alloc_prog_fd"))
> -               goto detach_cgroup;
> +               goto close_cgroup;
>         ASSERT_EQ(query_prog_cnt(cgroup_fd, "bpf_lsm_sk_alloc_security"), 1, "prog count");
>         ASSERT_EQ(query_prog_cnt(cgroup_fd, NULL), 1, "total prog count");
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> index 930a4181dbd9..d1d77785b165 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> @@ -176,6 +176,23 @@ void test__skip(void);
>  void test__fail(void);
>  int test__join_cgroup(const char *path);
>
> +static inline bool test_progs_check_errno(int error, int check)
> +{
> +       return error == -check ||
> +              (error && errno == check);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int test_progs_get_error(int error)
> +{
> +       if (test_progs_check_errno(error, ENOTSUP) ||
> +           test_progs_check_errno(error, ENOTSUPP)) {
> +               test__skip();
> +               return 0;
> +       } else {
> +               return error;
> +       }
> +}
> +
>  #define PRINT_FAIL(format...)                                                  \
>         ({                                                                     \
>                 test__fail();                                                  \
> @@ -338,8 +355,10 @@ int test__join_cgroup(const char *path);
>         static int duration = 0;                                        \
>         long long ___res = (res);                                       \
>         bool ___ok = ___res == 0;                                       \
> -       CHECK(!___ok, (name), "unexpected error: %lld (errno %d)\n",    \
> -             ___res, errno);                                           \
> +       if (test_progs_get_error(___res))                               \
> +               CHECK(!___ok, (name),                                   \
> +                     "unexpected error: %lld (errno %d)\n",            \
> +                     ___res, errno);                                   \
>         ___ok;                                                          \
>  })
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Eduard Zingerman July 8, 2024, 7:47 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, 2024-07-08 at 11:54 -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 7:38 PM Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> > 
> > Just like handling ENOTSUPP in test_lsm_cgroup_functional(), this patch
> > adds a new helper test_progs_get_error() to check whether the input error
> > is ENOTSUPP (524) or ENOTSUP (95). If it is, invoke test__skip() to skip
> > the test instead of using test__fail().
> > 
> > Use this helper in ASSERT_OK() before invoking CHECK() macro.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> > ---
> >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c     |  6 +----
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h      | 23 +++++++++++++++++--
> >  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> I haven't followed these patch sets, but no, let's not add magical
> special error codes handling into ASSERT_xxx() macros.

I agree with Andrii here.
You might use -d (denylist) option for test_progs to filter out test
cases you know are not supported.

[...]
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c
index 6df25de8f080..6511f5f4a00f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_cgroup.c
@@ -102,12 +102,8 @@  static void test_lsm_cgroup_functional(void)
 	ASSERT_EQ(query_prog_cnt(cgroup_fd, "bpf_lsm_sk_alloc_security"), 0, "prog count");
 	ASSERT_EQ(query_prog_cnt(cgroup_fd, NULL), 0, "total prog count");
 	err = bpf_prog_attach(alloc_prog_fd, cgroup_fd, BPF_LSM_CGROUP, 0);
-	if (err == -ENOTSUPP) {
-		test__skip();
-		goto close_cgroup;
-	}
 	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "attach alloc_prog_fd"))
-		goto detach_cgroup;
+		goto close_cgroup;
 	ASSERT_EQ(query_prog_cnt(cgroup_fd, "bpf_lsm_sk_alloc_security"), 1, "prog count");
 	ASSERT_EQ(query_prog_cnt(cgroup_fd, NULL), 1, "total prog count");
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
index 930a4181dbd9..d1d77785b165 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
@@ -176,6 +176,23 @@  void test__skip(void);
 void test__fail(void);
 int test__join_cgroup(const char *path);
 
+static inline bool test_progs_check_errno(int error, int check)
+{
+	return error == -check ||
+	       (error && errno == check);
+}
+
+static inline int test_progs_get_error(int error)
+{
+	if (test_progs_check_errno(error, ENOTSUP) ||
+	    test_progs_check_errno(error, ENOTSUPP)) {
+		test__skip();
+		return 0;
+	} else {
+		return error;
+	}
+}
+
 #define PRINT_FAIL(format...)                                                  \
 	({                                                                     \
 		test__fail();                                                  \
@@ -338,8 +355,10 @@  int test__join_cgroup(const char *path);
 	static int duration = 0;					\
 	long long ___res = (res);					\
 	bool ___ok = ___res == 0;					\
-	CHECK(!___ok, (name), "unexpected error: %lld (errno %d)\n",	\
-	      ___res, errno);						\
+	if (test_progs_get_error(___res))				\
+		CHECK(!___ok, (name),					\
+		      "unexpected error: %lld (errno %d)\n",		\
+		      ___res, errno);					\
 	___ok;								\
 })