diff mbox series

[07/27] btrfs: use bdev_max_active_zones instead of open coding it

Message ID 20220406060516.409838-8-hch@lst.de (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [01/27] target: remove an incorrect unmap zeroes data deduction | expand

Commit Message

Christoph Hellwig April 6, 2022, 6:04 a.m. UTC 
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 fs/btrfs/zoned.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Johannes Thumshirn April 6, 2022, 9:56 a.m. UTC | #1 
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
David Sterba via Ocfs2-devel April 7, 2022, 3:20 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 08:04:56AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

As it's a standalone patch I can take it (possibly with other similar
prep btrfs patches) in current development cycle to relieve the
inter-tree dependencies.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
index b7b5fac1c7790..5b85004d85d6c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
@@ -350,7 +350,6 @@  int btrfs_get_dev_zone_info(struct btrfs_device *device, bool populate_cache)
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = device->fs_info;
 	struct btrfs_zoned_device_info *zone_info = NULL;
 	struct block_device *bdev = device->bdev;
-	struct request_queue *queue = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
 	unsigned int max_active_zones;
 	unsigned int nactive;
 	sector_t nr_sectors;
@@ -410,7 +409,7 @@  int btrfs_get_dev_zone_info(struct btrfs_device *device, bool populate_cache)
 	if (!IS_ALIGNED(nr_sectors, zone_sectors))
 		zone_info->nr_zones++;
 
-	max_active_zones = queue_max_active_zones(queue);
+	max_active_zones = bdev_max_active_zones(bdev);
 	if (max_active_zones && max_active_zones < BTRFS_MIN_ACTIVE_ZONES) {
 		btrfs_err_in_rcu(fs_info,
 "zoned: %s: max active zones %u is too small, need at least %u active zones",