From patchwork Tue Jan 16 19:46:12 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jeff Layton X-Patchwork-Id: 13521233 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DA038120B; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 19:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705434470; cv=none; b=Af+W+Voru5FhpGiqtYRHT7pELBc/X8kbxvO/wjJsUg9akVDdjtRDVrUEyxExoqSVK6fhFZSxM3eEneT2gDSEhQxaf+kcB+1AiJNWvbSRhsFcqOQipiM6U6l6475MxHyV54yY467lYPwjl0VvcrghcVhGWI80AuJaMKKmgasINZg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705434470; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kls0ou0CepUaWcmG52kQ6qFEQcCGT2zxwwb8Xgjj51M=; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc:X-Mailer:X-Developer-Signature:X-Developer-Key; b=ea3cVl1iKqq9hjBZj2mY5osBku19UcHEojOzx2Hj64WfKTPCNZY1OwemhwpucKDPq5oDPxjh7LhXgjy41Bk3zl41EAh1oDhdqDqEDrrzIfGKrQD0HHAEm5EXC5SrADqVPhtRqvSSsRRSPhK9rS/hknZ/Iw/ylGJJdXSjoDoLTYg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JB/SitUh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JB/SitUh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FFD6C433F1; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 19:47:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1705434469; bh=kls0ou0CepUaWcmG52kQ6qFEQcCGT2zxwwb8Xgjj51M=; h=From:Date:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=JB/SitUhJfUwFnpyXYd9dt1UNVn2wpH3+LaieI2QKP1DW6mOOWviEEDRZrtrYWL2k Ra/072r0nhRsWZvd0xbd2jROArzvpEZk4vSMBQLkmju4PnMjRYVog1kG+T6SZagr4j w+Qk1Codi+TGkK50EEfta0H0jXRoWmoZkb58n64Gb4u0KfK1IjEZszaG/oGhSNkk56 S6vw/pq9iyo4+P8pGNUibJAEazvR1Gw2Ctdl0qt2GkKygXmQAJIblwqQmkA3QqFJi/ IyPehaJI3xo+oDo/EGAHPn3j41Sg0bo0yoOHi7Lqej/ZQJ8SwlY5RIVeqpoWPz9bGn e69pLTekd546A== From: Jeff Layton Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:46:12 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 16/20] filelock: reorganize locks_delete_block and __locks_insert_block Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20240116-flsplit-v1-16-c9d0f4370a5d@kernel.org> References: <20240116-flsplit-v1-0-c9d0f4370a5d@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240116-flsplit-v1-0-c9d0f4370a5d@kernel.org> To: Christian Brauner , Alexander Viro , Eric Van Hensbergen , Latchesar Ionkov , Dominique Martinet , Christian Schoenebeck , David Howells , Marc Dionne , Xiubo Li , Ilya Dryomov , Alexander Aring , David Teigland , Miklos Szeredi , Andreas Gruenbacher , Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker , Chuck Lever , Neil Brown , Olga Kornievskaia , Dai Ngo , Tom Talpey , Jan Kara , Mark Fasheh , Joel Becker , Joseph Qi , Steve French , Paulo Alcantara , Ronnie Sahlberg , Shyam Prasad N , Namjae Jeon , Sergey Senozhatsky , Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, gfs2@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Layton X-Mailer: b4 0.12.3 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=5173; i=jlayton@kernel.org; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=kls0ou0CepUaWcmG52kQ6qFEQcCGT2zxwwb8Xgjj51M=; b=owEBbQKS/ZANAwAIAQAOaEEZVoIVAcsmYgBlpt0i3yR4/c4kiH3TPF+F79Kq42wwoL7+Rx/zv amElbkvKFmJAjMEAAEIAB0WIQRLwNeyRHGyoYTq9dMADmhBGVaCFQUCZabdIgAKCRAADmhBGVaC FbL8D/4k9g/iQZOsLtiBHHpIIf4BJI03BPbjvrz5xSL2ghQ1fayjQGKClMiDdt4ZoRmerAi5Q90 hR5cA9VjEL05KtCttnutdl4dQMNNCblGtObbwY1AgemJcan92LF/yWc2iNNE3C2t5tdaepWXlHg /4XEyNMU3qY1u7Q1VFiNS5Q8DlEsBqZeWe57990Nw2ipNwBu5+nO18hZIcajx4k1SSQ9y9QHhsC wyV+edmSVt4IJOOrw4bQKpKooW+73rDjyczKsp4HRSdZ8Pnp+7w33h3zh2OJUECdWFw49FTkdCf 7sSlBG8z2BRXBqKbeoPVGL85qQpI8ql0uhVGzr96hH15n85lUDrJro0ylwORtdlAbsi9i9DoFSm VR0iyPSBugjFwEpa331KPMlMJehUGcKjQMu2NvUiXNVwQH292cGtjOvq88Cd60ozv8mL6TpJP7p qr0u35L0POXs14HfHZ+GoVijX0RkSF5DYB4bVD1rOjTmWkwL3JzYMSC2dXAm/sqXUBcXy+KFljK CB5WPvn7lsnrwun4GdCzt8+cb+g67uraolCIgYAIUiGSQMH2YuLMs+IDgrnEL/xtQL0iRREc0VQ 0RsjSyelSIyfqfzpdGz+Swz14kBsazKmo4FBbt9fyVxYdfNajfDADuoGzBWn4dHKaDTERbDyHBC oZTcZ70VgjZH4cQ== X-Developer-Key: i=jlayton@kernel.org; a=openpgp; fpr=4BC0D7B24471B2A184EAF5D3000E684119568215 Rename the old __locks_delete_block to __locks_unlink_lock. Rename change old locks_delete_block function to __locks_delete_block and have it take a file_lock_core. Make locks_delete_block a simple wrapper around __locks_delete_block. Also, change __locks_insert_block to take struct file_lock_core, and fix up its callers. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/locks.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c index 3a028a8aafeb..27160dc65d63 100644 --- a/fs/locks.c +++ b/fs/locks.c @@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ static void locks_delete_global_blocked(struct file_lock_core *waiter) * * Must be called with blocked_lock_lock held. */ -static void __locks_delete_block(struct file_lock_core *waiter) +static void __locks_unlink_block(struct file_lock_core *waiter) { locks_delete_global_blocked(waiter); list_del_init(&waiter->fl_blocked_member); @@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ static void __locks_wake_up_blocks(struct file_lock_core *blocker) struct file_lock_core, fl_blocked_member); fl = file_lock(waiter); - __locks_delete_block(waiter); + __locks_unlink_block(waiter); if ((IS_POSIX(waiter) || IS_FLOCK(waiter)) && fl->fl_lmops && fl->fl_lmops->lm_notify) fl->fl_lmops->lm_notify(fl); @@ -714,16 +714,9 @@ static void __locks_wake_up_blocks(struct file_lock_core *blocker) } } -/** - * locks_delete_block - stop waiting for a file lock - * @waiter: the lock which was waiting - * - * lockd/nfsd need to disconnect the lock while working on it. - */ -int locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter_fl) +static int __locks_delete_block(struct file_lock_core *waiter) { int status = -ENOENT; - struct file_lock_core *waiter = &waiter_fl->fl_core; /* * If fl_blocker is NULL, it won't be set again as this thread "owns" @@ -754,16 +747,27 @@ int locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter_fl) if (waiter->fl_blocker) status = 0; __locks_wake_up_blocks(waiter); - __locks_delete_block(waiter); + __locks_unlink_block(waiter); /* * The setting of fl_blocker to NULL marks the "done" point in deleting * a block. Paired with acquire at the top of this function. */ - smp_store_release(waiter->fl_blocker, NULL); + smp_store_release(&waiter->fl_blocker, NULL); spin_unlock(&blocked_lock_lock); return status; } + +/** + * locks_delete_block - stop waiting for a file lock + * @waiter: the lock which was waiting + * + * lockd/nfsd need to disconnect the lock while working on it. + */ +int locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter) +{ + return __locks_delete_block(&waiter->fl_core); +} EXPORT_SYMBOL(locks_delete_block); /* Insert waiter into blocker's block list. @@ -781,13 +785,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(locks_delete_block); * waiters, and add beneath any waiter that blocks the new waiter. * Thus wakeups don't happen until needed. */ -static void __locks_insert_block(struct file_lock *blocker_fl, - struct file_lock *waiter_fl, +static void __locks_insert_block(struct file_lock_core *blocker, + struct file_lock_core *waiter, bool conflict(struct file_lock_core *, struct file_lock_core *)) { - struct file_lock_core *blocker = &blocker_fl->fl_core; - struct file_lock_core *waiter = &waiter_fl->fl_core; struct file_lock_core *flc; BUG_ON(!list_empty(&waiter->fl_blocked_member)); @@ -812,8 +814,8 @@ static void __locks_insert_block(struct file_lock *blocker_fl, } /* Must be called with flc_lock held. */ -static void locks_insert_block(struct file_lock *blocker, - struct file_lock *waiter, +static void locks_insert_block(struct file_lock_core *blocker, + struct file_lock_core *waiter, bool conflict(struct file_lock_core *, struct file_lock_core *)) { @@ -1111,7 +1113,7 @@ static int flock_lock_inode(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request) if (!(request->fl_core.fl_flags & FL_SLEEP)) goto out; error = FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED; - locks_insert_block(fl, request, flock_locks_conflict); + locks_insert_block(&fl->fl_core, &request->fl_core, flock_locks_conflict); goto out; } if (request->fl_core.fl_flags & FL_ACCESS) @@ -1205,7 +1207,7 @@ static int posix_lock_inode(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request, __locks_wake_up_blocks(&request->fl_core); if (likely(!posix_locks_deadlock(request, fl))) { error = FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED; - __locks_insert_block(fl, request, + __locks_insert_block(&fl->fl_core, &request->fl_core, posix_locks_conflict); } spin_unlock(&blocked_lock_lock); @@ -1598,7 +1600,7 @@ int __break_lease(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode, unsigned int type) break_time -= jiffies; if (break_time == 0) break_time++; - locks_insert_block(fl, new_fl, leases_conflict); + locks_insert_block(&fl->fl_core, &new_fl->fl_core, leases_conflict); trace_break_lease_block(inode, new_fl); spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock); percpu_up_read(&file_rwsem);