From patchwork Wed Jan 31 23:02:09 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jeff Layton X-Patchwork-Id: 13540362 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 126CA1420A0; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 23:04:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706742248; cv=none; b=f7Xnv6DHmlId0Mz/blW67MzX3A/t+pfvqMiTFEkmt/FfBocQHovfZEt/rKeyctVZ9+m06JTqgtJFVVfQWy0JtxZVzQFSkp0uV4vpFL209j80T33MBUV7T3k37lGR2bBViICV1API7WXkDYI8l0DNeUVe3LU+4xr02LJ46toUVBc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706742248; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oXsh7Z3Zj8YwVWNqhAyX9dCLEvRylLbk3GgRqMltkDI=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=IxKUKtuKn/gV+wNlNUddWnDj35dwQzAyPpcIwqoiVPaB0HWcKOP7e08QfIOFGsllTvfNtCPEwpu4iV7hcd0+YWN2RMmSxKY46ljBErslGgJPkND9Wd/NwhLmFkG/mFoYWNhItO2YIQTlFbMSor8/wvB5JCoCqcrJ8rdSHiW+4NE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=HX9GxtHj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="HX9GxtHj" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CAFC5C433B1; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 23:04:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1706742247; bh=oXsh7Z3Zj8YwVWNqhAyX9dCLEvRylLbk3GgRqMltkDI=; h=From:Date:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=HX9GxtHji864xbCpDr8dxOatkhLnwmHD0kzn3uJRfOEEC8HMzkSQFFqiWpcbIe3II 8p97Hc3SuHpM6Gx9Gp5KIVavPWCQdNdOmdbGlav4n+VNubaw53U/nNlh4VUXSe6Tag +K+KHbMb0HRmHeEdutcN9e6mWqsgOJCSrR/tI5eDCKq7+k+S7Cxfd4wRsNxA6vwOGB de0Z0sMVLDjlMlaUKMgDvaYPhOkk/4WeAw/VEbMRbkZ9hbUxRU2XQwh4Dda41PL/c4 E2bXVexu35OP7niUGHSjDIICZ+oLBrXa/jPyCof119NB79ydojsS765KLBhLa1nXUY YR6xc72bd3emA== From: Jeff Layton Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:02:09 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v3 28/47] filelock: reorganize locks_delete_block and __locks_insert_block Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20240131-flsplit-v3-28-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org> References: <20240131-flsplit-v3-0-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240131-flsplit-v3-0-c6129007ee8d@kernel.org> To: Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , Chuck Lever , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , Jan Kara , Eric Van Hensbergen , Latchesar Ionkov , Dominique Martinet , Christian Schoenebeck , David Howells , Marc Dionne , Xiubo Li , Ilya Dryomov , Alexander Aring , David Teigland , Andreas Gruenbacher , Neil Brown , Olga Kornievskaia , Dai Ngo , Tom Talpey , Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker , Mark Fasheh , Joel Becker , Joseph Qi , Steve French , Paulo Alcantara , Ronnie Sahlberg , Shyam Prasad N , Namjae Jeon , Sergey Senozhatsky , Miklos Szeredi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, gfs2@lists.linux.dev, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Layton X-Mailer: b4 0.12.3 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=5008; i=jlayton@kernel.org; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=oXsh7Z3Zj8YwVWNqhAyX9dCLEvRylLbk3GgRqMltkDI=; b=owEBbQKS/ZANAwAIAQAOaEEZVoIVAcsmYgBlutFxzre30atP5W7Sf7TY3lvrDobazNYOrGTQw 1ZIjFXzhniJAjMEAAEIAB0WIQRLwNeyRHGyoYTq9dMADmhBGVaCFQUCZbrRcQAKCRAADmhBGVaC FUqXD/93uE7hJ0eDVn4U040TdajOsoJFEqE1JMzX+yb36gB+XiyHGvC/8ulONCZCBeKaFB4uZ2v aV0ZxfzvOUN+PUbUt+vgA+K4V4x3CsJT/Y3XzKtyCusvA5Wd+TJ1mYIAmp2n2oyD2wzn/vTopV2 to5rboxgaRQ57Qofqun64NDS/ZbvIVGgD36Y9Lsix9ZWqKTGwFJ08BLk1rimPLzbJHIg9lI/mFk VgJkncKS7d3skJ//+XzGLwAk4sZwtaPBk2HBu4H5VES9qVbC2NqwJu7zUKVao4j5AZHXaW2f0wB dAHFnfDDVA7ReLiv42YsbZeT8+2UikrtbQoqqRyEkDVGm5HpN3fU47lzP/7iaZ1qc6et80DnRKq tXbGmic0tpS7TdODZBv0CdatkBY04US4dYS52Kz4zmyYYXfuiilIigYeuYfoqQ081KE9uOunPsJ VTyeCUdfEdaaBpHpN8210I55Yg4QU8R6cjSPB+WAdQYoNdIISmIivpjMWNpNvahI6R20apzB2hg i8dIqBXN4/rr+BaEiYLFdezT3ENS36+E2QMrhRJrgp67NjPgv6/M5hkiMHr3IMLcbNLOLyA2I71 qvak+Vhs5kLhHFmdsWNKsG0WJL4LfI8LeuXFNZJYvFN0cZvi2Sg2Av9qKBFpRAOxX6TNug8QQFu x1WBiRjN1IzKhfA== X-Developer-Key: i=jlayton@kernel.org; a=openpgp; fpr=4BC0D7B24471B2A184EAF5D3000E684119568215 Rename the old __locks_delete_block to __locks_unlink_lock. Rename change old locks_delete_block function to __locks_delete_block and have it take a file_lock_core. Make locks_delete_block a simple wrapper around __locks_delete_block. Also, change __locks_insert_block to take struct file_lock_core, and fix up its callers. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/locks.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c index a2be1e0b5a94..c8fd2964dd98 100644 --- a/fs/locks.c +++ b/fs/locks.c @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static void locks_delete_global_blocked(struct file_lock_core *waiter) * * Must be called with blocked_lock_lock held. */ -static void __locks_delete_block(struct file_lock_core *waiter) +static void __locks_unlink_block(struct file_lock_core *waiter) { locks_delete_global_blocked(waiter); list_del_init(&waiter->flc_blocked_member); @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ static void __locks_wake_up_blocks(struct file_lock_core *blocker) struct file_lock_core, flc_blocked_member); fl = file_lock(waiter); - __locks_delete_block(waiter); + __locks_unlink_block(waiter); if ((waiter->flc_flags & (FL_POSIX | FL_FLOCK)) && fl->fl_lmops && fl->fl_lmops->lm_notify) fl->fl_lmops->lm_notify(fl); @@ -691,16 +691,9 @@ static void __locks_wake_up_blocks(struct file_lock_core *blocker) } } -/** - * locks_delete_block - stop waiting for a file lock - * @waiter: the lock which was waiting - * - * lockd/nfsd need to disconnect the lock while working on it. - */ -int locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter_fl) +static int __locks_delete_block(struct file_lock_core *waiter) { int status = -ENOENT; - struct file_lock_core *waiter = &waiter_fl->c; /* * If fl_blocker is NULL, it won't be set again as this thread "owns" @@ -731,7 +724,7 @@ int locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter_fl) if (waiter->flc_blocker) status = 0; __locks_wake_up_blocks(waiter); - __locks_delete_block(waiter); + __locks_unlink_block(waiter); /* * The setting of fl_blocker to NULL marks the "done" point in deleting @@ -741,6 +734,17 @@ int locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter_fl) spin_unlock(&blocked_lock_lock); return status; } + +/** + * locks_delete_block - stop waiting for a file lock + * @waiter: the lock which was waiting + * + * lockd/nfsd need to disconnect the lock while working on it. + */ +int locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter) +{ + return __locks_delete_block(&waiter->c); +} EXPORT_SYMBOL(locks_delete_block); /* Insert waiter into blocker's block list. @@ -758,13 +762,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(locks_delete_block); * waiters, and add beneath any waiter that blocks the new waiter. * Thus wakeups don't happen until needed. */ -static void __locks_insert_block(struct file_lock *blocker_fl, - struct file_lock *waiter_fl, +static void __locks_insert_block(struct file_lock_core *blocker, + struct file_lock_core *waiter, bool conflict(struct file_lock_core *, struct file_lock_core *)) { - struct file_lock_core *blocker = &blocker_fl->c; - struct file_lock_core *waiter = &waiter_fl->c; struct file_lock_core *flc; BUG_ON(!list_empty(&waiter->flc_blocked_member)); @@ -789,8 +791,8 @@ static void __locks_insert_block(struct file_lock *blocker_fl, } /* Must be called with flc_lock held. */ -static void locks_insert_block(struct file_lock *blocker, - struct file_lock *waiter, +static void locks_insert_block(struct file_lock_core *blocker, + struct file_lock_core *waiter, bool conflict(struct file_lock_core *, struct file_lock_core *)) { @@ -1088,7 +1090,7 @@ static int flock_lock_inode(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request) if (!(request->c.flc_flags & FL_SLEEP)) goto out; error = FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED; - locks_insert_block(fl, request, flock_locks_conflict); + locks_insert_block(&fl->c, &request->c, flock_locks_conflict); goto out; } if (request->c.flc_flags & FL_ACCESS) @@ -1182,7 +1184,7 @@ static int posix_lock_inode(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request, __locks_wake_up_blocks(&request->c); if (likely(!posix_locks_deadlock(request, fl))) { error = FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED; - __locks_insert_block(fl, request, + __locks_insert_block(&fl->c, &request->c, posix_locks_conflict); } spin_unlock(&blocked_lock_lock); @@ -1575,7 +1577,7 @@ int __break_lease(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode, unsigned int type) break_time -= jiffies; if (break_time == 0) break_time++; - locks_insert_block(fl, new_fl, leases_conflict); + locks_insert_block(&fl->c, &new_fl->c, leases_conflict); trace_break_lease_block(inode, new_fl); spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock); percpu_up_read(&file_rwsem);