Message ID | 5a208528.nZGENOlql9oMjjxc%akpm@linux-foundation.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi Gang, On 2017/12/1 6:24, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: > From: Gang He <ghe@suse.com> > Subject: ocfs2: add ocfs2_overwrite_io() > > Add ocfs2_overwrite_io(), which is used to judge if overwrite allocated > blocks, otherwise, the write will bring extra block allocation overhead. > > [ghe@suse.com: v2] > Link: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lkml.kernel.org_r_1511944612-2D9629-2D3-2Dgit-2Dsend-2Demail-2Dghe-40suse.com&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=C4AZ7lGI2-gfFtbla8puNvYIA3a9Cr_XOH6oyx94oGo&s=QhxdPyP9gdEJZTa2UhuSk0x7ENXyGXUOIBV_LyP8oZw&e= > Link: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lkml.kernel.org_r_1511775987-2D841-2D3-2Dgit-2Dsend-2Demail-2Dghe-40suse.com&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=C4AZ7lGI2-gfFtbla8puNvYIA3a9Cr_XOH6oyx94oGo&s=T9Ljku-nipBqCaeXWukY2hAwcHQL95gtlU7pS3l1fgs&e= > Signed-off-by: Gang He <ghe@suse.com> > Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@versity.com> > Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> > Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> > Cc: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com> > Cc: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@h3c.com> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > --- > > fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > fs/ocfs2/extent_map.h | 3 ++ > 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+) > > diff -puN fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c~ocfs2-add-ocfs2_overwrite_io-function fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c > --- a/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c~ocfs2-add-ocfs2_overwrite_io-function > +++ a/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c > @@ -832,6 +832,47 @@ out: > return ret; > } > > +/* Is IO overwriting allocated blocks? */ > +int ocfs2_overwrite_io(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *di_bh, > + u64 map_start, u64 map_len) > +{ > + int ret = 0, is_last; > + u32 mapping_end, cpos; > + struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb); > + struct ocfs2_extent_rec rec; > + > + if ((OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_dyn_features & OCFS2_INLINE_DATA_FL) && > + ((map_start + map_len) <= i_size_read(inode))) > + goto out; > + Should we return -EAGAIN directly when the condition ((OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_dyn_features & OCFS2_INLINE_DATA_FL) && ((map_start + map_len) > i_size_read(inode))) is true? Thanks, Alex > + cpos = map_start >> osb->s_clustersize_bits; > + mapping_end = ocfs2_clusters_for_bytes(inode->i_sb, > + map_start + map_len); > + is_last = 0; > + while (cpos < mapping_end && !is_last) { > + ret = ocfs2_get_clusters_nocache(inode, di_bh, cpos, > + NULL, &rec, &is_last); > + if (ret) { > + mlog_errno(ret); > + goto out; > + } > + > + if (rec.e_blkno == 0ULL) > + break; > + > + if (rec.e_flags & OCFS2_EXT_REFCOUNTED) > + break; > + > + cpos = le32_to_cpu(rec.e_cpos) + > + le16_to_cpu(rec.e_leaf_clusters); > + } > + > + if (cpos < mapping_end) > + ret = -EAGAIN; > +out: > + return ret; > +} > + > int ocfs2_seek_data_hole_offset(struct file *file, loff_t *offset, int whence) > { > struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host; > diff -puN fs/ocfs2/extent_map.h~ocfs2-add-ocfs2_overwrite_io-function fs/ocfs2/extent_map.h > --- a/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.h~ocfs2-add-ocfs2_overwrite_io-function > +++ a/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.h > @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ int ocfs2_extent_map_get_blocks(struct i > int ocfs2_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo, > u64 map_start, u64 map_len); > > +int ocfs2_overwrite_io(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *di_bh, > + u64 map_start, u64 map_len); > + > int ocfs2_seek_data_hole_offset(struct file *file, loff_t *offset, int origin); > > int ocfs2_xattr_get_clusters(struct inode *inode, u32 v_cluster, > _ > > _______________________________________________ > Ocfs2-devel mailing list > Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com > https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel > > . >
Hi Alex, Sorry for replaying your mail so late. >>> > Hi Gang, > > On 2017/12/1 6:24, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: >> From: Gang He <ghe@suse.com> >> Subject: ocfs2: add ocfs2_overwrite_io() >> >> Add ocfs2_overwrite_io(), which is used to judge if overwrite allocated >> blocks, otherwise, the write will bring extra block allocation overhead. >> >> [ghe@suse.com: v2] >> Link: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lkml.kernel.org_r_151194 > 4612-2D9629-2D3-2Dgit-2Dsend-2Demail-2Dghe-40suse.com&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8P > Zh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=C4AZ7lGI2- > gfFtbla8puNvYIA3a9Cr_XOH6oyx94oGo&s=QhxdPyP9gdEJZTa2UhuSk0x7ENXyGXUOIBV_LyP8oZ > w&e= >> Link: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lkml.kernel.org_r_151177 > 5987-2D841-2D3-2Dgit-2Dsend-2Demail-2Dghe-40suse.com&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZ > h8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=C7gAd4uDxlAvTdc0vmU6X8CMk6L2iDY8-HD0qT6Fo7Y&m=C4AZ7lGI2-g > fFtbla8puNvYIA3a9Cr_XOH6oyx94oGo&s=T9Ljku-nipBqCaeXWukY2hAwcHQL95gtlU7pS3l1fgs&e > = >> Signed-off-by: Gang He <ghe@suse.com> >> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@versity.com> >> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> >> Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> >> Cc: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com> >> Cc: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@h3c.com> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> >> --- >> >> fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> fs/ocfs2/extent_map.h | 3 ++ >> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+) >> >> diff -puN fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c~ocfs2-add-ocfs2_overwrite_io-function > fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c >> --- a/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c~ocfs2-add-ocfs2_overwrite_io-function >> +++ a/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c >> @@ -832,6 +832,47 @@ out: >> return ret; >> } >> >> +/* Is IO overwriting allocated blocks? */ >> +int ocfs2_overwrite_io(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *di_bh, >> + u64 map_start, u64 map_len) >> +{ >> + int ret = 0, is_last; >> + u32 mapping_end, cpos; >> + struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb); >> + struct ocfs2_extent_rec rec; >> + >> + if ((OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_dyn_features & OCFS2_INLINE_DATA_FL) && >> + ((map_start + map_len) <= i_size_read(inode))) >> + goto out; >> + > Should we return -EAGAIN directly when the condition > ((OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_dyn_features & OCFS2_INLINE_DATA_FL) && ((map_start + > map_len) > i_size_read(inode))) > is true? Yes, here the code can be improved like as below. e.g. if (OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_dyn_features & OCFS2_INLINE_DATA_FL) { if (ocfs2_size_fits_inline_data(di_bh, map_start + map_len)) goto out; else return -EAGAIN; } Thanks Gang > > Thanks, > Alex >> + cpos = map_start >> osb->s_clustersize_bits; >> + mapping_end = ocfs2_clusters_for_bytes(inode->i_sb, >> + map_start + map_len); >> + is_last = 0; >> + while (cpos < mapping_end && !is_last) { >> + ret = ocfs2_get_clusters_nocache(inode, di_bh, cpos, >> + NULL, &rec, &is_last); >> + if (ret) { >> + mlog_errno(ret); >> + goto out; >> + } >> + >> + if (rec.e_blkno == 0ULL) >> + break; >> + >> + if (rec.e_flags & OCFS2_EXT_REFCOUNTED) >> + break; >> + >> + cpos = le32_to_cpu(rec.e_cpos) + >> + le16_to_cpu(rec.e_leaf_clusters); >> + } >> + >> + if (cpos < mapping_end) >> + ret = -EAGAIN; >> +out: >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> int ocfs2_seek_data_hole_offset(struct file *file, loff_t *offset, int > whence) >> { >> struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host; >> diff -puN fs/ocfs2/extent_map.h~ocfs2-add-ocfs2_overwrite_io-function > fs/ocfs2/extent_map.h >> --- a/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.h~ocfs2-add-ocfs2_overwrite_io-function >> +++ a/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.h >> @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ int ocfs2_extent_map_get_blocks(struct i >> int ocfs2_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo, >> u64 map_start, u64 map_len); >> >> +int ocfs2_overwrite_io(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *di_bh, >> + u64 map_start, u64 map_len); >> + >> int ocfs2_seek_data_hole_offset(struct file *file, loff_t *offset, int > origin); >> >> int ocfs2_xattr_get_clusters(struct inode *inode, u32 v_cluster, >> _ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ocfs2-devel mailing list >> Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com >> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel >> >> . >>
diff -puN fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c~ocfs2-add-ocfs2_overwrite_io-function fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c --- a/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c~ocfs2-add-ocfs2_overwrite_io-function +++ a/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c @@ -832,6 +832,47 @@ out: return ret; } +/* Is IO overwriting allocated blocks? */ +int ocfs2_overwrite_io(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *di_bh, + u64 map_start, u64 map_len) +{ + int ret = 0, is_last; + u32 mapping_end, cpos; + struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb); + struct ocfs2_extent_rec rec; + + if ((OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_dyn_features & OCFS2_INLINE_DATA_FL) && + ((map_start + map_len) <= i_size_read(inode))) + goto out; + + cpos = map_start >> osb->s_clustersize_bits; + mapping_end = ocfs2_clusters_for_bytes(inode->i_sb, + map_start + map_len); + is_last = 0; + while (cpos < mapping_end && !is_last) { + ret = ocfs2_get_clusters_nocache(inode, di_bh, cpos, + NULL, &rec, &is_last); + if (ret) { + mlog_errno(ret); + goto out; + } + + if (rec.e_blkno == 0ULL) + break; + + if (rec.e_flags & OCFS2_EXT_REFCOUNTED) + break; + + cpos = le32_to_cpu(rec.e_cpos) + + le16_to_cpu(rec.e_leaf_clusters); + } + + if (cpos < mapping_end) + ret = -EAGAIN; +out: + return ret; +} + int ocfs2_seek_data_hole_offset(struct file *file, loff_t *offset, int whence) { struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host; diff -puN fs/ocfs2/extent_map.h~ocfs2-add-ocfs2_overwrite_io-function fs/ocfs2/extent_map.h --- a/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.h~ocfs2-add-ocfs2_overwrite_io-function +++ a/fs/ocfs2/extent_map.h @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ int ocfs2_extent_map_get_blocks(struct i int ocfs2_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo, u64 map_start, u64 map_len); +int ocfs2_overwrite_io(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *di_bh, + u64 map_start, u64 map_len); + int ocfs2_seek_data_hole_offset(struct file *file, loff_t *offset, int origin); int ocfs2_xattr_get_clusters(struct inode *inode, u32 v_cluster,