From patchwork Thu Nov 23 04:03:46 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "David E. Box" X-Patchwork-Id: 13465741 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="mU/C5tzE" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.8]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78C61D44; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 20:03:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1700712240; x=1732248240; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2P//zGL+ImtfZApcWnHht/9BnGa2K8YOJPWY83LQtgg=; b=mU/C5tzE5ynOEh0zRunblsoeiUjfuw2N5IIvfHekSFIFyrVuX+utu6w6 3zjfmTwIgljAAzmYCoBpPmf4zqmEi921PM0Ah0AEUmts3SlDDwFktXdwb moiYVGuAajd1UrmDiApT/JmJaQOF/TDYzbEtez0H7+9sBePokVGaE6D1Q 5mNF9MAtp7CgT59Ou83WwOOUDvFNUkv2lfwewR985yf7yqiZ2m32O+EQO inKSwDINfWOFKwF/Q5eXByWzPv8A/gVBQBnIJnzEOAHSchf2z4b0869Rf B0xXAAQnflGMfZN+NcJQxMKwLRc0yQE/6jMC+n/eUqQ6bO1E8a+E+YCZP g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10902"; a="5334662" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,220,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="5334662" Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmvoesa102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Nov 2023 20:03:57 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10902"; a="837671152" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,220,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="837671152" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Nov 2023 20:03:57 -0800 Received: from debox1-desk4.lan (snpatel1-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com [10.209.89.91]) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F20580D94; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 20:03:56 -0800 (PST) From: "David E. Box" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, rajvi.jingar@linux.intel.com Subject: [PATCH V5 11/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Allow pmc_core_ssram_init to fail Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 20:03:46 -0800 Message-Id: <20231123040355.82139-12-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20231123040355.82139-1-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> References: <20231123040355.82139-1-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Currently, if the PMC SSRAM initialization fails, no error is returned and the only indication is that a PMC device has not been created. Instead, allow an error to be returned and handled directly by the caller. Signed-off-by: David E. Box Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen --- V5 - No change V4 - Remove return value check in mtl.c. Proper use of the value would require returning an error status from pmc_core_add_pmc(). But the function that calls it will be removed in the next patch so wait to use it then. V3 - New patch split from V2 PATCH 9 - Add dev_warn on pmc_core_ssram_init fail drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h | 2 +- drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core_ssram.c | 21 +++++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h index ccf24e0f5e50..edaa70067e41 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h @@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ int pmc_core_resume_common(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev); int get_primary_reg_base(struct pmc *pmc); extern void pmc_core_get_low_power_modes(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev); -extern void pmc_core_ssram_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev); +extern int pmc_core_ssram_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev); int spt_core_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev); int cnp_core_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev); diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core_ssram.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core_ssram.c index 13fa16f0d52e..815950713e25 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core_ssram.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core_ssram.c @@ -35,20 +35,20 @@ static inline u64 get_base(void __iomem *addr, u32 offset) return lo_hi_readq(addr + offset) & GENMASK_ULL(63, 3); } -static void +static int pmc_core_pmc_add(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev, u64 pwrm_base, const struct pmc_reg_map *reg_map, int pmc_index) { struct pmc *pmc = pmcdev->pmcs[pmc_index]; if (!pwrm_base) - return; + return -ENODEV; /* Memory for primary PMC has been allocated in core.c */ if (!pmc) { pmc = devm_kzalloc(&pmcdev->pdev->dev, sizeof(*pmc), GFP_KERNEL); if (!pmc) - return; + return -ENOMEM; } pmc->map = reg_map; @@ -57,10 +57,12 @@ pmc_core_pmc_add(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev, u64 pwrm_base, if (!pmc->regbase) { devm_kfree(&pmcdev->pdev->dev, pmc); - return; + return -ENOMEM; } pmcdev->pmcs[pmc_index] = pmc; + + return 0; } static void @@ -96,7 +98,7 @@ pmc_core_ssram_get_pmc(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev, void __iomem *ssram, u32 offset, iounmap(ssram); } -void pmc_core_ssram_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev) +int pmc_core_ssram_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev) { void __iomem *ssram; struct pci_dev *pcidev; @@ -105,7 +107,7 @@ void pmc_core_ssram_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev) pcidev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(0, 0, PCI_DEVFN(20, 2)); if (!pcidev) - goto out; + return -ENODEV; ret = pcim_enable_device(pcidev); if (ret) @@ -123,11 +125,14 @@ void pmc_core_ssram_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev) pmc_core_ssram_get_pmc(pmcdev, ssram, SSRAM_PCH_OFFSET, PMC_IDX_PCH); iounmap(ssram); -out: - return; + + return 0; disable_dev: + pmcdev->ssram_pcidev = NULL; pci_disable_device(pcidev); release_dev: pci_dev_put(pcidev); + + return ret; }