Message ID | 20201120085157.7136-1-zhukeqian1@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <SRS0=Jbxh=E2=nongnu.org=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@kernel.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1DC8C63777 for <qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 08:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E66A22253 for <qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 08:54:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5E66A22253 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:59520 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org>) id 1kg2Bl-00076F-CO for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 03:54:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56510) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>) id 1kg2AR-0005pT-QJ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 03:53:19 -0500 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:2533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>) id 1kg2AN-0001Ui-VB; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 03:53:19 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS414-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Ccr0W0MTdzhdX3; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:52:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from DESKTOP-5IS4806.china.huawei.com (10.174.187.37) by DGGEMS414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:52:51 +0800 From: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com> To: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] bugfix: Decrease dirty bitmap blocks after we remove ramblock Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:51:55 +0800 Message-ID: <20201120085157.7136-1-zhukeqian1@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.4.windows.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.174.187.37] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.191; envelope-from=zhukeqian1@huawei.com; helo=szxga05-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel> List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe> Cc: wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com> Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" <qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org> |
Series |
bugfix: Decrease dirty bitmap blocks after we remove ramblock
|
expand
|