Message ID | 20230328155926.2277-1-eric.devolder@oracle.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | hw/acpi: bump MADT to revision 5 | expand |
I forgot to include the updated ACPI tables. I will do that as part of v2. In the meantime, I appreciate any feedback... eric On 3/28/23 10:59, Eric DeVolder wrote: > The following Linux kernel change broke CPU hotplug for MADT revision > less than 5. > > commit e2869bd7af60 ("x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that cannot be onlined for x2APIC") > > As part of the investigation into resolving this breakage, I learned > that i386 QEMU reports revision 1, while technically it is at revision 3. > (Arm QEMU reports revision 4, and that is valid/correct.) > > ACPI 6.3 bumps MADT revision to 5 as it introduces an Online Capable > flag that the above Linux patch utilizes to denote hot pluggable CPUs. > > So in order to bump MADT to the current revision of 5, need to > validate that all MADT table changes between 1 and 5 are present > in QEMU. > > Below is a table summarizing the changes to the MADT. This information > gleamed from the ACPI specs on uefi.org. > > ACPI MADT What > Version Version > 1.0 MADT not present > 2.0 1 Section 5.2.10.4 > 3.0 2 Section 5.2.11.4 > 5.2.11.13 Local SAPIC Structure added two new fields: > ACPI Processor UID Value > ACPI Processor UID String > 5.2.10.14 Platform Interrupt Sources Structure: > Reserved changed to Platform Interrupt Sources Flags > 3.0b 2 Section 5.2.11.4 > Added a section describing guidelines for the ordering of > processors in the MADT to support proper boot processor > and multi-threaded logical processor operation. > 4.0 3 Section 5.2.12 > Adds Processor Local x2APIC structure type 9 > Adds Local x2APIC NMI structure type 0xA > 5.0 3 Section 5.2.12 > 6.0 3 Section 5.2.12 > 6.0a 4 Section 5.2.12 > Adds ARM GIC structure types 0xB-0xF > 6.2a 45 Section 5.2.12 <--- yep it says version 45! > 6.2b 5 Section 5.2.12 > GIC ITS last Reserved offset changed to 16 from 20 (typo) > 6.3 5 Section 5.2.12 > Adds Local APIC Flags Online Capable! > Adds GICC SPE Overflow Interrupt field > 6.4 5 Section 5.2.12 > Adds Multiprocessor Wakeup Structure type 0x10 > (change notes says structure previously misplaced?) > 6.5 5 Section 5.2.12 > > For the MADT revision change 1 -> 2, the spec has a change to the > SAPIC structure. In general, QEMU does not generate/support SAPIC. > So the QEMU i386 MADT revision can safely be moved to 2. > > For the MADT revision change 2 -> 3, the spec adds Local x2APIC > structures. QEMU has long supported x2apic ACPI structures. A simple > search of x2apic within QEMU source and hw/i386/acpi-common.c > specifically reveals this. So the QEMU i386 MADT revision can safely > be moved to 3. > > For the MADT revision change 3 -> 4, the spec adds support for the ARM > GIC structures. QEMU ARM does in fact generate and report revision 4. > As these will not be used by i386 QEMU, so then the QEMU i386 MADT > revision can safely be moved to 4 as well. > > Now for the MADT revision change 4 -> 5, the spec adds the Online > Capable flag to the Local APIC structure, and the ARM GICC SPE > Overflow Interrupt field. > > For the ARM SPE, an existing 3-byte Reserved field is broken into a 1- > byte Reserved field and a 2-byte SPE field. The spec says that is SPE > Overflow is not supported, it should be zero. > > For the i386 Local APIC flag Online Capable, the spec has certain rules > about this value. And in particuar setting this value now explicitly > indicates a hotpluggable CPU. > > So this patch makes the needed changes to move both ARM and i386 MADT > to revision 5. These are not complicated, thankfully. > > Without these changes, the information below shows "how" CPU hotplug > breaks with the current upstream Linux kernel 6.3. For example, a Linux > guest started with: > > qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 30,maxcpus=32 ... > > and then attempting to hotplug a CPU: > > (QEMU) device_add id=cpu30 driver=host-x86_64-cpu socket-id=0 core-id=30 thread-id=0 > > fails with the following: > > APIC: NR_CPUS/possible_cpus limit of 30 reached. Processor 30/0x. > ACPI: Unable to map lapic to logical cpu number > acpi LNXCPU:1e: Enumeration failure > > # dmesg | grep smpboot > smpboot: Allowing 30 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs > smpboot: CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1533 @ 2.10GHz (family: 0x) > smpboot: Max logical packages: 1 > smpboot: Total of 30 processors activated (125708.76 BogoMIPS) > > # iasl -d /sys/firmware/tables/acpi/APIC > [000h 0000 4] Signature : "APIC" [Multiple APIC Descript > [004h 0004 4] Table Length : 00000170 > [008h 0008 1] Revision : 01 <===== > [009h 0009 1] Checksum : 9C > [00Ah 0010 6] Oem ID : "BOCHS " > [010h 0016 8] Oem Table ID : "BXPC " > [018h 0024 4] Oem Revision : 00000001 > [01Ch 0028 4] Asl Compiler ID : "BXPC" > [020h 0032 4] Asl Compiler Revision : 00000001 > > ... > > [114h 0276 1] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > [115h 0277 1] Length : 08 > [116h 0278 1] Processor ID : 1D > [117h 0279 1] Local Apic ID : 1D > [118h 0280 4] Flags (decoded below) : 00000001 > Processor Enabled : 1 <===== > > [11Ch 0284 1] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > [11Dh 0285 1] Length : 08 > [11Eh 0286 1] Processor ID : 1E > [11Fh 0287 1] Local Apic ID : 1E > [120h 0288 4] Flags (decoded below) : 00000000 > Processor Enabled : 0 <===== > > [124h 0292 1] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > [125h 0293 1] Length : 08 > [126h 0294 1] Processor ID : 1F > [127h 0295 1] Local Apic ID : 1F > [128h 0296 4] Flags (decoded below) : 00000000 > Processor Enabled : 0 <===== > > The (latest upstream) Linux kernel sees 30 Enabled processors, and > does not consider processors 31 and 32 to be hotpluggable. > > With this patch series applied, by bumping MADT to revision 5, the > latest upstream Linux kernel correctly identifies 30 CPUs plus 2 > hotpluggable CPUS. > > CPU30 has been hot-added > smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 30 APIC 0x1e > Will online and init hotplugged CPU: 30 > > # dmesg | grep smpboot > smpboot: Allowing 32 CPUs, 2 hotplug CPUs > smpboot: CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1533 @ 2.10GHz (family: 0x6, model: 0x56, stepping: 0x3) > smpboot: Max logical packages: 2 > smpboot: Total of 30 processors activated (125708.76 BogoMIPS) > > # iasl -d /sys/firmware/tables/acpi/APIC > [000h 0000 004h] Signature : "APIC" [Multiple APIC Descript > [004h 0004 004h] Table Length : 00000170 > [008h 0008 001h] Revision : 05 <===== > [009h 0009 001h] Checksum : 94 > [00Ah 0010 006h] Oem ID : "BOCHS " > [010h 0016 008h] Oem Table ID : "BXPC " > [018h 0024 004h] Oem Revision : 00000001 > [01Ch 0028 004h] Asl Compiler ID : "BXPC" > [020h 0032 004h] Asl Compiler Revision : 00000001 > > ... > > [114h 0276 001h] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > [115h 0277 001h] Length : 08 > [116h 0278 001h] Processor ID : 1D > [117h 0279 001h] Local Apic ID : 1D > [118h 0280 004h] Flags (decoded below) : 00000001 > Processor Enabled : 1 <===== > Runtime Online Capable : 0 <===== > > [11Ch 0284 001h] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > [11Dh 0285 001h] Length : 08 > [11Eh 0286 001h] Processor ID : 1E > [11Fh 0287 001h] Local Apic ID : 1E > [120h 0288 004h] Flags (decoded below) : 00000002 > Processor Enabled : 0 <===== > Runtime Online Capable : 1 <===== > > [124h 0292 001h] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > [125h 0293 001h] Length : 08 > [126h 0294 001h] Processor ID : 1F > [127h 0295 001h] Local Apic ID : 1F > [128h 0296 004h] Flags (decoded below) : 00000002 > Processor Enabled : 0 <===== > Runtime Online Capable : 1 <===== > > Regards, > Eric > > > Eric DeVolder (2): > hw/acpi: arm: bump MADT to revision 5 > hw/acpi: i386: bump MADT to revision 5 > > hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 6 ++++-- > hw/i386/acpi-common.c | 13 ++++++++++--- > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >
Hmm I don't think we can reasonably make such a change for 8.0. Seems too risky. Also, I feel we want to have an internal (with "x-" prefix") flag to revert to old behaviour, in case of breakage on some guests. and maybe we want to keep old revision for old machine types. On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:59:24AM -0400, Eric DeVolder wrote: > The following Linux kernel change broke CPU hotplug for MADT revision > less than 5. > > commit e2869bd7af60 ("x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that cannot be onlined for x2APIC") Presumably it's being fixed? Link to discussion? Patch fixing that in Linux? > As part of the investigation into resolving this breakage, I learned > that i386 QEMU reports revision 1, while technically it is at revision 3. > (Arm QEMU reports revision 4, and that is valid/correct.) > > ACPI 6.3 bumps MADT revision to 5 as it introduces an Online Capable > flag that the above Linux patch utilizes to denote hot pluggable CPUs. > > So in order to bump MADT to the current revision of 5, need to > validate that all MADT table changes between 1 and 5 are present > in QEMU. > > Below is a table summarizing the changes to the MADT. This information > gleamed from the ACPI specs on uefi.org. > > ACPI MADT What > Version Version > 1.0 MADT not present > 2.0 1 Section 5.2.10.4 > 3.0 2 Section 5.2.11.4 > 5.2.11.13 Local SAPIC Structure added two new fields: > ACPI Processor UID Value > ACPI Processor UID String > 5.2.10.14 Platform Interrupt Sources Structure: > Reserved changed to Platform Interrupt Sources Flags > 3.0b 2 Section 5.2.11.4 > Added a section describing guidelines for the ordering of > processors in the MADT to support proper boot processor > and multi-threaded logical processor operation. > 4.0 3 Section 5.2.12 > Adds Processor Local x2APIC structure type 9 > Adds Local x2APIC NMI structure type 0xA > 5.0 3 Section 5.2.12 > 6.0 3 Section 5.2.12 > 6.0a 4 Section 5.2.12 > Adds ARM GIC structure types 0xB-0xF > 6.2a 45 Section 5.2.12 <--- yep it says version 45! > 6.2b 5 Section 5.2.12 > GIC ITS last Reserved offset changed to 16 from 20 (typo) > 6.3 5 Section 5.2.12 > Adds Local APIC Flags Online Capable! > Adds GICC SPE Overflow Interrupt field > 6.4 5 Section 5.2.12 > Adds Multiprocessor Wakeup Structure type 0x10 > (change notes says structure previously misplaced?) > 6.5 5 Section 5.2.12 > > For the MADT revision change 1 -> 2, the spec has a change to the > SAPIC structure. In general, QEMU does not generate/support SAPIC. > So the QEMU i386 MADT revision can safely be moved to 2. > > For the MADT revision change 2 -> 3, the spec adds Local x2APIC > structures. QEMU has long supported x2apic ACPI structures. A simple > search of x2apic within QEMU source and hw/i386/acpi-common.c > specifically reveals this. But not unconditionally. > So the QEMU i386 MADT revision can safely > be moved to 3. > > For the MADT revision change 3 -> 4, the spec adds support for the ARM > GIC structures. QEMU ARM does in fact generate and report revision 4. > As these will not be used by i386 QEMU, so then the QEMU i386 MADT > revision can safely be moved to 4 as well. > > Now for the MADT revision change 4 -> 5, the spec adds the Online > Capable flag to the Local APIC structure, and the ARM GICC SPE > Overflow Interrupt field. > > For the ARM SPE, an existing 3-byte Reserved field is broken into a 1- > byte Reserved field and a 2-byte SPE field. The spec says that is SPE > Overflow is not supported, it should be zero. > > For the i386 Local APIC flag Online Capable, the spec has certain rules > about this value. And in particuar setting this value now explicitly > indicates a hotpluggable CPU. > > So this patch makes the needed changes to move both ARM and i386 MADT > to revision 5. These are not complicated, thankfully. > > Without these changes, the information below shows "how" CPU hotplug > breaks with the current upstream Linux kernel 6.3. For example, a Linux > guest started with: > > qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 30,maxcpus=32 ... > > and then attempting to hotplug a CPU: > > (QEMU) device_add id=cpu30 driver=host-x86_64-cpu socket-id=0 core-id=30 thread-id=0 > > fails with the following: > > APIC: NR_CPUS/possible_cpus limit of 30 reached. Processor 30/0x. > ACPI: Unable to map lapic to logical cpu number > acpi LNXCPU:1e: Enumeration failure > > # dmesg | grep smpboot > smpboot: Allowing 30 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs > smpboot: CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1533 @ 2.10GHz (family: 0x) > smpboot: Max logical packages: 1 > smpboot: Total of 30 processors activated (125708.76 BogoMIPS) > > # iasl -d /sys/firmware/tables/acpi/APIC > [000h 0000 4] Signature : "APIC" [Multiple APIC Descript > [004h 0004 4] Table Length : 00000170 > [008h 0008 1] Revision : 01 <===== > [009h 0009 1] Checksum : 9C > [00Ah 0010 6] Oem ID : "BOCHS " > [010h 0016 8] Oem Table ID : "BXPC " > [018h 0024 4] Oem Revision : 00000001 > [01Ch 0028 4] Asl Compiler ID : "BXPC" > [020h 0032 4] Asl Compiler Revision : 00000001 > > ... > > [114h 0276 1] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > [115h 0277 1] Length : 08 > [116h 0278 1] Processor ID : 1D > [117h 0279 1] Local Apic ID : 1D > [118h 0280 4] Flags (decoded below) : 00000001 > Processor Enabled : 1 <===== > > [11Ch 0284 1] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > [11Dh 0285 1] Length : 08 > [11Eh 0286 1] Processor ID : 1E > [11Fh 0287 1] Local Apic ID : 1E > [120h 0288 4] Flags (decoded below) : 00000000 > Processor Enabled : 0 <===== > > [124h 0292 1] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > [125h 0293 1] Length : 08 > [126h 0294 1] Processor ID : 1F > [127h 0295 1] Local Apic ID : 1F > [128h 0296 4] Flags (decoded below) : 00000000 > Processor Enabled : 0 <===== > > The (latest upstream) Linux kernel sees 30 Enabled processors, and > does not consider processors 31 and 32 to be hotpluggable. > > With this patch series applied, by bumping MADT to revision 5, the > latest upstream Linux kernel correctly identifies 30 CPUs plus 2 > hotpluggable CPUS. > > CPU30 has been hot-added > smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 30 APIC 0x1e > Will online and init hotplugged CPU: 30 > > # dmesg | grep smpboot > smpboot: Allowing 32 CPUs, 2 hotplug CPUs > smpboot: CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1533 @ 2.10GHz (family: 0x6, model: 0x56, stepping: 0x3) > smpboot: Max logical packages: 2 > smpboot: Total of 30 processors activated (125708.76 BogoMIPS) > > # iasl -d /sys/firmware/tables/acpi/APIC > [000h 0000 004h] Signature : "APIC" [Multiple APIC Descript > [004h 0004 004h] Table Length : 00000170 > [008h 0008 001h] Revision : 05 <===== > [009h 0009 001h] Checksum : 94 > [00Ah 0010 006h] Oem ID : "BOCHS " > [010h 0016 008h] Oem Table ID : "BXPC " > [018h 0024 004h] Oem Revision : 00000001 > [01Ch 0028 004h] Asl Compiler ID : "BXPC" > [020h 0032 004h] Asl Compiler Revision : 00000001 > > ... > > [114h 0276 001h] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > [115h 0277 001h] Length : 08 > [116h 0278 001h] Processor ID : 1D > [117h 0279 001h] Local Apic ID : 1D > [118h 0280 004h] Flags (decoded below) : 00000001 > Processor Enabled : 1 <===== > Runtime Online Capable : 0 <===== > > [11Ch 0284 001h] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > [11Dh 0285 001h] Length : 08 > [11Eh 0286 001h] Processor ID : 1E > [11Fh 0287 001h] Local Apic ID : 1E > [120h 0288 004h] Flags (decoded below) : 00000002 > Processor Enabled : 0 <===== > Runtime Online Capable : 1 <===== > > [124h 0292 001h] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > [125h 0293 001h] Length : 08 > [126h 0294 001h] Processor ID : 1F > [127h 0295 001h] Local Apic ID : 1F > [128h 0296 004h] Flags (decoded below) : 00000002 > Processor Enabled : 0 <===== > Runtime Online Capable : 1 <===== > > Regards, > Eric Can you please report which guests were tested? > > Eric DeVolder (2): > hw/acpi: arm: bump MADT to revision 5 > hw/acpi: i386: bump MADT to revision 5 > > hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 6 ++++-- > hw/i386/acpi-common.c | 13 ++++++++++--- > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.31.1 > > >
On 3/29/23 00:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Hmm I don't think we can reasonably make such a change for 8.0. > Seems too risky. > Also, I feel we want to have an internal (with "x-" prefix") flag to > revert to old behaviour, in case of breakage on some guests. and maybe > we want to keep old revision for old machine types. Ok, what option name, for keeping old behavior, would you like? > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:59:24AM -0400, Eric DeVolder wrote: >> The following Linux kernel change broke CPU hotplug for MADT revision >> less than 5. >> >> commit e2869bd7af60 ("x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that cannot be onlined for x2APIC") > > Presumably it's being fixed? Link to discussion? Patch fixing that in > Linux? https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20230327191026.3454-1-eric.devolder@oracle.com/T/#t > > >> As part of the investigation into resolving this breakage, I learned >> that i386 QEMU reports revision 1, while technically it is at revision 3. >> (Arm QEMU reports revision 4, and that is valid/correct.) >> >> ACPI 6.3 bumps MADT revision to 5 as it introduces an Online Capable >> flag that the above Linux patch utilizes to denote hot pluggable CPUs. >> >> So in order to bump MADT to the current revision of 5, need to >> validate that all MADT table changes between 1 and 5 are present >> in QEMU. >> >> Below is a table summarizing the changes to the MADT. This information >> gleamed from the ACPI specs on uefi.org. >> >> ACPI MADT What >> Version Version >> 1.0 MADT not present >> 2.0 1 Section 5.2.10.4 >> 3.0 2 Section 5.2.11.4 >> 5.2.11.13 Local SAPIC Structure added two new fields: >> ACPI Processor UID Value >> ACPI Processor UID String >> 5.2.10.14 Platform Interrupt Sources Structure: >> Reserved changed to Platform Interrupt Sources Flags >> 3.0b 2 Section 5.2.11.4 >> Added a section describing guidelines for the ordering of >> processors in the MADT to support proper boot processor >> and multi-threaded logical processor operation. >> 4.0 3 Section 5.2.12 >> Adds Processor Local x2APIC structure type 9 >> Adds Local x2APIC NMI structure type 0xA >> 5.0 3 Section 5.2.12 >> 6.0 3 Section 5.2.12 >> 6.0a 4 Section 5.2.12 >> Adds ARM GIC structure types 0xB-0xF >> 6.2a 45 Section 5.2.12 <--- yep it says version 45! >> 6.2b 5 Section 5.2.12 >> GIC ITS last Reserved offset changed to 16 from 20 (typo) >> 6.3 5 Section 5.2.12 >> Adds Local APIC Flags Online Capable! >> Adds GICC SPE Overflow Interrupt field >> 6.4 5 Section 5.2.12 >> Adds Multiprocessor Wakeup Structure type 0x10 >> (change notes says structure previously misplaced?) >> 6.5 5 Section 5.2.12 >> >> For the MADT revision change 1 -> 2, the spec has a change to the >> SAPIC structure. In general, QEMU does not generate/support SAPIC. >> So the QEMU i386 MADT revision can safely be moved to 2. >> >> For the MADT revision change 2 -> 3, the spec adds Local x2APIC >> structures. QEMU has long supported x2apic ACPI structures. A simple >> search of x2apic within QEMU source and hw/i386/acpi-common.c >> specifically reveals this. > > But not unconditionally. I don't think that reporting revision 3 requires that generation of x2apic; one could still see apic, x2apic, or sapic in theory. I realize qemu doesn't do sapic... > >> So the QEMU i386 MADT revision can safely >> be moved to 3. >> >> For the MADT revision change 3 -> 4, the spec adds support for the ARM >> GIC structures. QEMU ARM does in fact generate and report revision 4. >> As these will not be used by i386 QEMU, so then the QEMU i386 MADT >> revision can safely be moved to 4 as well. >> >> Now for the MADT revision change 4 -> 5, the spec adds the Online >> Capable flag to the Local APIC structure, and the ARM GICC SPE >> Overflow Interrupt field. >> >> For the ARM SPE, an existing 3-byte Reserved field is broken into a 1- >> byte Reserved field and a 2-byte SPE field. The spec says that is SPE >> Overflow is not supported, it should be zero. >> >> For the i386 Local APIC flag Online Capable, the spec has certain rules >> about this value. And in particuar setting this value now explicitly >> indicates a hotpluggable CPU. >> >> So this patch makes the needed changes to move both ARM and i386 MADT >> to revision 5. These are not complicated, thankfully. >> >> Without these changes, the information below shows "how" CPU hotplug >> breaks with the current upstream Linux kernel 6.3. For example, a Linux >> guest started with: >> >> qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 30,maxcpus=32 ... >> >> and then attempting to hotplug a CPU: >> >> (QEMU) device_add id=cpu30 driver=host-x86_64-cpu socket-id=0 core-id=30 thread-id=0 >> >> fails with the following: >> >> APIC: NR_CPUS/possible_cpus limit of 30 reached. Processor 30/0x. >> ACPI: Unable to map lapic to logical cpu number >> acpi LNXCPU:1e: Enumeration failure >> >> # dmesg | grep smpboot >> smpboot: Allowing 30 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs >> smpboot: CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1533 @ 2.10GHz (family: 0x) >> smpboot: Max logical packages: 1 >> smpboot: Total of 30 processors activated (125708.76 BogoMIPS) >> >> # iasl -d /sys/firmware/tables/acpi/APIC >> [000h 0000 4] Signature : "APIC" [Multiple APIC Descript >> [004h 0004 4] Table Length : 00000170 >> [008h 0008 1] Revision : 01 <===== >> [009h 0009 1] Checksum : 9C >> [00Ah 0010 6] Oem ID : "BOCHS " >> [010h 0016 8] Oem Table ID : "BXPC " >> [018h 0024 4] Oem Revision : 00000001 >> [01Ch 0028 4] Asl Compiler ID : "BXPC" >> [020h 0032 4] Asl Compiler Revision : 00000001 >> >> ... >> >> [114h 0276 1] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] >> [115h 0277 1] Length : 08 >> [116h 0278 1] Processor ID : 1D >> [117h 0279 1] Local Apic ID : 1D >> [118h 0280 4] Flags (decoded below) : 00000001 >> Processor Enabled : 1 <===== >> >> [11Ch 0284 1] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] >> [11Dh 0285 1] Length : 08 >> [11Eh 0286 1] Processor ID : 1E >> [11Fh 0287 1] Local Apic ID : 1E >> [120h 0288 4] Flags (decoded below) : 00000000 >> Processor Enabled : 0 <===== >> >> [124h 0292 1] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] >> [125h 0293 1] Length : 08 >> [126h 0294 1] Processor ID : 1F >> [127h 0295 1] Local Apic ID : 1F >> [128h 0296 4] Flags (decoded below) : 00000000 >> Processor Enabled : 0 <===== >> >> The (latest upstream) Linux kernel sees 30 Enabled processors, and >> does not consider processors 31 and 32 to be hotpluggable. >> >> With this patch series applied, by bumping MADT to revision 5, the >> latest upstream Linux kernel correctly identifies 30 CPUs plus 2 >> hotpluggable CPUS. >> >> CPU30 has been hot-added >> smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 30 APIC 0x1e >> Will online and init hotplugged CPU: 30 >> >> # dmesg | grep smpboot >> smpboot: Allowing 32 CPUs, 2 hotplug CPUs >> smpboot: CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1533 @ 2.10GHz (family: 0x6, model: 0x56, stepping: 0x3) >> smpboot: Max logical packages: 2 >> smpboot: Total of 30 processors activated (125708.76 BogoMIPS) >> >> # iasl -d /sys/firmware/tables/acpi/APIC >> [000h 0000 004h] Signature : "APIC" [Multiple APIC Descript >> [004h 0004 004h] Table Length : 00000170 >> [008h 0008 001h] Revision : 05 <===== >> [009h 0009 001h] Checksum : 94 >> [00Ah 0010 006h] Oem ID : "BOCHS " >> [010h 0016 008h] Oem Table ID : "BXPC " >> [018h 0024 004h] Oem Revision : 00000001 >> [01Ch 0028 004h] Asl Compiler ID : "BXPC" >> [020h 0032 004h] Asl Compiler Revision : 00000001 >> >> ... >> >> [114h 0276 001h] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] >> [115h 0277 001h] Length : 08 >> [116h 0278 001h] Processor ID : 1D >> [117h 0279 001h] Local Apic ID : 1D >> [118h 0280 004h] Flags (decoded below) : 00000001 >> Processor Enabled : 1 <===== >> Runtime Online Capable : 0 <===== >> >> [11Ch 0284 001h] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] >> [11Dh 0285 001h] Length : 08 >> [11Eh 0286 001h] Processor ID : 1E >> [11Fh 0287 001h] Local Apic ID : 1E >> [120h 0288 004h] Flags (decoded below) : 00000002 >> Processor Enabled : 0 <===== >> Runtime Online Capable : 1 <===== >> >> [124h 0292 001h] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] >> [125h 0293 001h] Length : 08 >> [126h 0294 001h] Processor ID : 1F >> [127h 0295 001h] Local Apic ID : 1F >> [128h 0296 004h] Flags (decoded below) : 00000002 >> Processor Enabled : 0 <===== >> Runtime Online Capable : 1 <===== >> >> Regards, >> Eric > > Can you please report which guests were tested? I've been using primarily upstream Linux. Kernels at and before 6.2.0 didn't have the "broken" patch mentioned above, and worked (for the reasons cited in the patch discussion to "fix" that patch). Any kernel since has the "broken" patch and will exhibit the issue. I've been using q35. If there are other samples you'd like to see, let me know and I'll try. Also, my responses will be delayed as I'm traveling the remainder of the week. Thanks! eric > > >> >> Eric DeVolder (2): >> hw/acpi: arm: bump MADT to revision 5 >> hw/acpi: i386: bump MADT to revision 5 >> >> hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 6 ++++-- >> hw/i386/acpi-common.c | 13 ++++++++++--- >> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.31.1 >> >> >> >
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 08:14:37AM -0500, Eric DeVolder wrote: > > > On 3/29/23 00:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Hmm I don't think we can reasonably make such a change for 8.0. > > Seems too risky. > > Also, I feel we want to have an internal (with "x-" prefix") flag to > > revert to old behaviour, in case of breakage on some guests. and maybe > > we want to keep old revision for old machine types. > Ok, what option name, for keeping old behavior, would you like? Don't much care. x-madt-rev? > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:59:24AM -0400, Eric DeVolder wrote: > > > The following Linux kernel change broke CPU hotplug for MADT revision > > > less than 5. > > > > > > commit e2869bd7af60 ("x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that cannot be onlined for x2APIC") > > > > Presumably it's being fixed? Link to discussion? Patch fixing that in > > Linux? > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20230327191026.3454-1-eric.devolder@oracle.com/T/#t Great! Maybe stick a Link: tag in the commit log. > > > > > > > As part of the investigation into resolving this breakage, I learned > > > that i386 QEMU reports revision 1, while technically it is at revision 3. > > > (Arm QEMU reports revision 4, and that is valid/correct.) > > > > > > ACPI 6.3 bumps MADT revision to 5 as it introduces an Online Capable > > > flag that the above Linux patch utilizes to denote hot pluggable CPUs. > > > > > > So in order to bump MADT to the current revision of 5, need to > > > validate that all MADT table changes between 1 and 5 are present > > > in QEMU. > > > > > > Below is a table summarizing the changes to the MADT. This information > > > gleamed from the ACPI specs on uefi.org. > > > > > > ACPI MADT What > > > Version Version > > > 1.0 MADT not present > > > 2.0 1 Section 5.2.10.4 > > > 3.0 2 Section 5.2.11.4 > > > 5.2.11.13 Local SAPIC Structure added two new fields: > > > ACPI Processor UID Value > > > ACPI Processor UID String > > > 5.2.10.14 Platform Interrupt Sources Structure: > > > Reserved changed to Platform Interrupt Sources Flags > > > 3.0b 2 Section 5.2.11.4 > > > Added a section describing guidelines for the ordering of > > > processors in the MADT to support proper boot processor > > > and multi-threaded logical processor operation. > > > 4.0 3 Section 5.2.12 > > > Adds Processor Local x2APIC structure type 9 > > > Adds Local x2APIC NMI structure type 0xA > > > 5.0 3 Section 5.2.12 > > > 6.0 3 Section 5.2.12 > > > 6.0a 4 Section 5.2.12 > > > Adds ARM GIC structure types 0xB-0xF > > > 6.2a 45 Section 5.2.12 <--- yep it says version 45! > > > 6.2b 5 Section 5.2.12 > > > GIC ITS last Reserved offset changed to 16 from 20 (typo) > > > 6.3 5 Section 5.2.12 > > > Adds Local APIC Flags Online Capable! > > > Adds GICC SPE Overflow Interrupt field > > > 6.4 5 Section 5.2.12 > > > Adds Multiprocessor Wakeup Structure type 0x10 > > > (change notes says structure previously misplaced?) > > > 6.5 5 Section 5.2.12 > > > > > > For the MADT revision change 1 -> 2, the spec has a change to the > > > SAPIC structure. In general, QEMU does not generate/support SAPIC. > > > So the QEMU i386 MADT revision can safely be moved to 2. > > > > > > For the MADT revision change 2 -> 3, the spec adds Local x2APIC > > > structures. QEMU has long supported x2apic ACPI structures. A simple > > > search of x2apic within QEMU source and hw/i386/acpi-common.c > > > specifically reveals this. > > > > But not unconditionally. > > I don't think that reporting revision 3 requires that generation of x2apic; > one could still see apic, x2apic, or sapic in theory. I realize qemu doesn't > do sapic... > > > > > > So the QEMU i386 MADT revision can safely > > > be moved to 3. > > > > > > For the MADT revision change 3 -> 4, the spec adds support for the ARM > > > GIC structures. QEMU ARM does in fact generate and report revision 4. > > > As these will not be used by i386 QEMU, so then the QEMU i386 MADT > > > revision can safely be moved to 4 as well. > > > > > > Now for the MADT revision change 4 -> 5, the spec adds the Online > > > Capable flag to the Local APIC structure, and the ARM GICC SPE > > > Overflow Interrupt field. > > > > > > For the ARM SPE, an existing 3-byte Reserved field is broken into a 1- > > > byte Reserved field and a 2-byte SPE field. The spec says that is SPE > > > Overflow is not supported, it should be zero. > > > > > > For the i386 Local APIC flag Online Capable, the spec has certain rules > > > about this value. And in particuar setting this value now explicitly > > > indicates a hotpluggable CPU. > > > > > > So this patch makes the needed changes to move both ARM and i386 MADT > > > to revision 5. These are not complicated, thankfully. > > > > > > Without these changes, the information below shows "how" CPU hotplug > > > breaks with the current upstream Linux kernel 6.3. For example, a Linux > > > guest started with: > > > > > > qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 30,maxcpus=32 ... > > > > > > and then attempting to hotplug a CPU: > > > > > > (QEMU) device_add id=cpu30 driver=host-x86_64-cpu socket-id=0 core-id=30 thread-id=0 > > > > > > fails with the following: > > > > > > APIC: NR_CPUS/possible_cpus limit of 30 reached. Processor 30/0x. > > > ACPI: Unable to map lapic to logical cpu number > > > acpi LNXCPU:1e: Enumeration failure > > > > > > # dmesg | grep smpboot > > > smpboot: Allowing 30 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs > > > smpboot: CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1533 @ 2.10GHz (family: 0x) > > > smpboot: Max logical packages: 1 > > > smpboot: Total of 30 processors activated (125708.76 BogoMIPS) > > > > > > # iasl -d /sys/firmware/tables/acpi/APIC > > > [000h 0000 4] Signature : "APIC" [Multiple APIC Descript > > > [004h 0004 4] Table Length : 00000170 > > > [008h 0008 1] Revision : 01 <===== > > > [009h 0009 1] Checksum : 9C > > > [00Ah 0010 6] Oem ID : "BOCHS " > > > [010h 0016 8] Oem Table ID : "BXPC " > > > [018h 0024 4] Oem Revision : 00000001 > > > [01Ch 0028 4] Asl Compiler ID : "BXPC" > > > [020h 0032 4] Asl Compiler Revision : 00000001 > > > > > > ... > > > > > > [114h 0276 1] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > > > [115h 0277 1] Length : 08 > > > [116h 0278 1] Processor ID : 1D > > > [117h 0279 1] Local Apic ID : 1D > > > [118h 0280 4] Flags (decoded below) : 00000001 > > > Processor Enabled : 1 <===== > > > > > > [11Ch 0284 1] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > > > [11Dh 0285 1] Length : 08 > > > [11Eh 0286 1] Processor ID : 1E > > > [11Fh 0287 1] Local Apic ID : 1E > > > [120h 0288 4] Flags (decoded below) : 00000000 > > > Processor Enabled : 0 <===== > > > > > > [124h 0292 1] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > > > [125h 0293 1] Length : 08 > > > [126h 0294 1] Processor ID : 1F > > > [127h 0295 1] Local Apic ID : 1F > > > [128h 0296 4] Flags (decoded below) : 00000000 > > > Processor Enabled : 0 <===== > > > > > > The (latest upstream) Linux kernel sees 30 Enabled processors, and > > > does not consider processors 31 and 32 to be hotpluggable. > > > > > > With this patch series applied, by bumping MADT to revision 5, the > > > latest upstream Linux kernel correctly identifies 30 CPUs plus 2 > > > hotpluggable CPUS. > > > > > > CPU30 has been hot-added > > > smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 30 APIC 0x1e > > > Will online and init hotplugged CPU: 30 > > > > > > # dmesg | grep smpboot > > > smpboot: Allowing 32 CPUs, 2 hotplug CPUs > > > smpboot: CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1533 @ 2.10GHz (family: 0x6, model: 0x56, stepping: 0x3) > > > smpboot: Max logical packages: 2 > > > smpboot: Total of 30 processors activated (125708.76 BogoMIPS) > > > > > > # iasl -d /sys/firmware/tables/acpi/APIC > > > [000h 0000 004h] Signature : "APIC" [Multiple APIC Descript > > > [004h 0004 004h] Table Length : 00000170 > > > [008h 0008 001h] Revision : 05 <===== > > > [009h 0009 001h] Checksum : 94 > > > [00Ah 0010 006h] Oem ID : "BOCHS " > > > [010h 0016 008h] Oem Table ID : "BXPC " > > > [018h 0024 004h] Oem Revision : 00000001 > > > [01Ch 0028 004h] Asl Compiler ID : "BXPC" > > > [020h 0032 004h] Asl Compiler Revision : 00000001 > > > > > > ... > > > > > > [114h 0276 001h] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > > > [115h 0277 001h] Length : 08 > > > [116h 0278 001h] Processor ID : 1D > > > [117h 0279 001h] Local Apic ID : 1D > > > [118h 0280 004h] Flags (decoded below) : 00000001 > > > Processor Enabled : 1 <===== > > > Runtime Online Capable : 0 <===== > > > > > > [11Ch 0284 001h] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > > > [11Dh 0285 001h] Length : 08 > > > [11Eh 0286 001h] Processor ID : 1E > > > [11Fh 0287 001h] Local Apic ID : 1E > > > [120h 0288 004h] Flags (decoded below) : 00000002 > > > Processor Enabled : 0 <===== > > > Runtime Online Capable : 1 <===== > > > > > > [124h 0292 001h] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > > > [125h 0293 001h] Length : 08 > > > [126h 0294 001h] Processor ID : 1F > > > [127h 0295 001h] Local Apic ID : 1F > > > [128h 0296 004h] Flags (decoded below) : 00000002 > > > Processor Enabled : 0 <===== > > > Runtime Online Capable : 1 <===== > > > > > > Regards, > > > Eric > > > > Can you please report which guests were tested? > > I've been using primarily upstream Linux. Kernels at and before 6.2.0 didn't > have the "broken" patch mentioned above, and worked (for the reasons cited > in the patch discussion to "fix" that patch). Any kernel since has the > "broken" patch and will exhibit the issue. > > I've been using q35. > > If there are other samples you'd like to see, let me know and I'll try. > > Also, my responses will be delayed as I'm traveling the remainder of the week. > > Thanks! > eric As a minimum some windows versions. The older the better. > > > > > > > > > > > Eric DeVolder (2): > > > hw/acpi: arm: bump MADT to revision 5 > > > hw/acpi: i386: bump MADT to revision 5 > > > > > > hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 6 ++++-- > > > hw/i386/acpi-common.c | 13 ++++++++++--- > > > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > -- > > > 2.31.1 > > > > > > > > > > >
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 08:14:37AM -0500, Eric DeVolder wrote: > > > > > > On 3/29/23 00:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > Hmm I don't think we can reasonably make such a change for 8.0. > > > Seems too risky. > > > Also, I feel we want to have an internal (with "x-" prefix") flag to > > > revert to old behaviour, in case of breakage on some guests. and maybe > > > we want to keep old revision for old machine types. > > Ok, what option name, for keeping old behavior, would you like? > > Don't much care. x-madt-rev? > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:59:24AM -0400, Eric DeVolder wrote: > > > > The following Linux kernel change broke CPU hotplug for MADT revision > > > > less than 5. > > > > > > > > commit e2869bd7af60 ("x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that cannot be onlined for x2APIC") > > > > > > Presumably it's being fixed? Link to discussion? Patch fixing that in > > > Linux? > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20230327191026.3454-1-eric.devolder@oracle.com/T/#t > > Great! Maybe stick a Link: tag in the commit log. If the original bug is in the kernel and kernel upstream has accepted both your fix and Mario's patch on the acpi revision mess, I see no urgency to fix this in QEMU. Maybe we can address this in the 8.1 development window.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 01:06:36PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 08:14:37AM -0500, Eric DeVolder wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 3/29/23 00:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > Hmm I don't think we can reasonably make such a change for 8.0. > > > > Seems too risky. > > > > Also, I feel we want to have an internal (with "x-" prefix") flag to > > > > revert to old behaviour, in case of breakage on some guests. and maybe > > > > we want to keep old revision for old machine types. > > > Ok, what option name, for keeping old behavior, would you like? > > > > Don't much care. x-madt-rev? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:59:24AM -0400, Eric DeVolder wrote: > > > > > The following Linux kernel change broke CPU hotplug for MADT revision > > > > > less than 5. > > > > > > > > > > commit e2869bd7af60 ("x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that cannot be onlined for x2APIC") > > > > > > > > Presumably it's being fixed? Link to discussion? Patch fixing that in > > > > Linux? > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20230327191026.3454-1-eric.devolder@oracle.com/T/#t > > > > Great! Maybe stick a Link: tag in the commit log. > > If the original bug is in the kernel and kernel upstream has accepted both > your fix and Mario's patch on the acpi revision mess, I see no urgency to > fix this in QEMU. > > Maybe we can address this in the 8.1 development window. Why "maybe"? Eric is working on a patch I don't see why we won't address it.
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 01:06:36PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 08:14:37AM -0500, Eric DeVolder wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/29/23 00:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > Hmm I don't think we can reasonably make such a change for 8.0. > > > > > Seems too risky. > > > > > Also, I feel we want to have an internal (with "x-" prefix") flag to > > > > > revert to old behaviour, in case of breakage on some guests. and maybe > > > > > we want to keep old revision for old machine types. > > > > Ok, what option name, for keeping old behavior, would you like? > > > > > > Don't much care. x-madt-rev? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:59:24AM -0400, Eric DeVolder wrote: > > > > > > The following Linux kernel change broke CPU hotplug for MADT revision > > > > > > less than 5. > > > > > > > > > > > > commit e2869bd7af60 ("x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that cannot be onlined for x2APIC") > > > > > > > > > > Presumably it's being fixed? Link to discussion? Patch fixing that in > > > > > Linux? > > > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20230327191026.3454-1-eric.devolder@oracle.com/T/#t > > > > > > Great! Maybe stick a Link: tag in the commit log. > > > > If the original bug is in the kernel and kernel upstream has accepted both > > your fix and Mario's patch on the acpi revision mess, I see no urgency to > > fix this in QEMU. > > > > Maybe we can address this in the 8.1 development window. > > Why "maybe"? Eric is working on a patch I don't see why we won't > address it. > I am not opposed to addressing it. I just think it might be too risky for 8.0 given that we are already past the hard feature freeze date.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 07:32:59PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote: > > > On Thu, 30 Mar 2023, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 01:06:36PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 08:14:37AM -0500, Eric DeVolder wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/29/23 00:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > Hmm I don't think we can reasonably make such a change for 8.0. > > > > > > Seems too risky. > > > > > > Also, I feel we want to have an internal (with "x-" prefix") flag to > > > > > > revert to old behaviour, in case of breakage on some guests. and maybe > > > > > > we want to keep old revision for old machine types. > > > > > Ok, what option name, for keeping old behavior, would you like? > > > > > > > > Don't much care. x-madt-rev? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:59:24AM -0400, Eric DeVolder wrote: > > > > > > > The following Linux kernel change broke CPU hotplug for MADT revision > > > > > > > less than 5. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commit e2869bd7af60 ("x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that cannot be onlined for x2APIC") > > > > > > > > > > > > Presumably it's being fixed? Link to discussion? Patch fixing that in > > > > > > Linux? > > > > > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20230327191026.3454-1-eric.devolder@oracle.com/T/#t > > > > > > > > Great! Maybe stick a Link: tag in the commit log. > > > > > > If the original bug is in the kernel and kernel upstream has accepted both > > > your fix and Mario's patch on the acpi revision mess, I see no urgency to > > > fix this in QEMU. > > > > > > Maybe we can address this in the 8.1 development window. > > > > Why "maybe"? Eric is working on a patch I don't see why we won't > > address it. > > > > I am not opposed to addressing it. I just think it might be too risky for > 8.0 given that we are already past the hard feature freeze date. This does not look to me like a justified change for 8.0. We have rev = 1 for years.
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 12:47:05 -0400 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 08:14:37AM -0500, Eric DeVolder wrote: > > > > > > On 3/29/23 00:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > Hmm I don't think we can reasonably make such a change for 8.0. > > > Seems too risky. > > > Also, I feel we want to have an internal (with "x-" prefix") flag to > > > revert to old behaviour, in case of breakage on some guests. and maybe > > > we want to keep old revision for old machine types. > > Ok, what option name, for keeping old behavior, would you like? > > Don't much care. x-madt-rev? if it works fine (cold & hot-plug) with older linux/windows guests I'd rather avoid adding compat knob (we typically do that in ACPI tables only when change breaks something). (as old guest I'd define WinXP sp3 (/me wonders if we still care about dead EOLed OS) perhaps WS2008 would be a better minimum target these days and RHEL6 (or some older ACPI enabled kernel with hotplug support)) > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:59:24AM -0400, Eric DeVolder wrote: > > > > The following Linux kernel change broke CPU hotplug for MADT revision > > > > less than 5. > > > > > > > > commit e2869bd7af60 ("x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that cannot be onlined for x2APIC") > > > > > > Presumably it's being fixed? Link to discussion? Patch fixing that in > > > Linux? > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20230327191026.3454-1-eric.devolder@oracle.com/T/#t > > Great! Maybe stick a Link: tag in the commit log. So it's guest bug which is in process of being fixed. (i.e. QEMU technically correct as long as MADT revision < 5) In this case I'd not touch x86 MADT at all (It should be upto downstream distros to fix guest kernel). Probably the same applies to ARM variant i.e. we should bump rev only when current one gets in the way (aka we are pulling in new fields/definitions from new version) > > > > As part of the investigation into resolving this breakage, I learned > > > > that i386 QEMU reports revision 1, while technically it is at revision 3. > > > > (Arm QEMU reports revision 4, and that is valid/correct.) > > > > > > > > ACPI 6.3 bumps MADT revision to 5 as it introduces an Online Capable > > > > flag that the above Linux patch utilizes to denote hot pluggable CPUs. > > > > > > > > So in order to bump MADT to the current revision of 5, need to > > > > validate that all MADT table changes between 1 and 5 are present > > > > in QEMU. > > > > > > > > Below is a table summarizing the changes to the MADT. This information > > > > gleamed from the ACPI specs on uefi.org. > > > > > > > > ACPI MADT What > > > > Version Version > > > > 1.0 MADT not present > > > > 2.0 1 Section 5.2.10.4 > > > > 3.0 2 Section 5.2.11.4 > > > > 5.2.11.13 Local SAPIC Structure added two new fields: > > > > ACPI Processor UID Value > > > > ACPI Processor UID String > > > > 5.2.10.14 Platform Interrupt Sources Structure: > > > > Reserved changed to Platform Interrupt Sources Flags > > > > 3.0b 2 Section 5.2.11.4 > > > > Added a section describing guidelines for the ordering of > > > > processors in the MADT to support proper boot processor > > > > and multi-threaded logical processor operation. > > > > 4.0 3 Section 5.2.12 > > > > Adds Processor Local x2APIC structure type 9 > > > > Adds Local x2APIC NMI structure type 0xA > > > > 5.0 3 Section 5.2.12 > > > > 6.0 3 Section 5.2.12 > > > > 6.0a 4 Section 5.2.12 > > > > Adds ARM GIC structure types 0xB-0xF > > > > 6.2a 45 Section 5.2.12 <--- yep it says version 45! > > > > 6.2b 5 Section 5.2.12 > > > > GIC ITS last Reserved offset changed to 16 from 20 (typo) > > > > 6.3 5 Section 5.2.12 > > > > Adds Local APIC Flags Online Capable! > > > > Adds GICC SPE Overflow Interrupt field > > > > 6.4 5 Section 5.2.12 > > > > Adds Multiprocessor Wakeup Structure type 0x10 > > > > (change notes says structure previously misplaced?) > > > > 6.5 5 Section 5.2.12 > > > > > > > > For the MADT revision change 1 -> 2, the spec has a change to the > > > > SAPIC structure. In general, QEMU does not generate/support SAPIC. > > > > So the QEMU i386 MADT revision can safely be moved to 2. > > > > > > > > For the MADT revision change 2 -> 3, the spec adds Local x2APIC > > > > structures. QEMU has long supported x2apic ACPI structures. A simple > > > > search of x2apic within QEMU source and hw/i386/acpi-common.c > > > > specifically reveals this. > > > > > > But not unconditionally. > > > > I don't think that reporting revision 3 requires that generation of x2apic; > > one could still see apic, x2apic, or sapic in theory. I realize qemu doesn't > > do sapic... > > > > > > > > > So the QEMU i386 MADT revision can safely > > > > be moved to 3. > > > > > > > > For the MADT revision change 3 -> 4, the spec adds support for the ARM > > > > GIC structures. QEMU ARM does in fact generate and report revision 4. > > > > As these will not be used by i386 QEMU, so then the QEMU i386 MADT > > > > revision can safely be moved to 4 as well. > > > > > > > > Now for the MADT revision change 4 -> 5, the spec adds the Online > > > > Capable flag to the Local APIC structure, and the ARM GICC SPE > > > > Overflow Interrupt field. > > > > > > > > For the ARM SPE, an existing 3-byte Reserved field is broken into a 1- > > > > byte Reserved field and a 2-byte SPE field. The spec says that is SPE > > > > Overflow is not supported, it should be zero. > > > > > > > > For the i386 Local APIC flag Online Capable, the spec has certain rules > > > > about this value. And in particuar setting this value now explicitly > > > > indicates a hotpluggable CPU. > > > > > > > > So this patch makes the needed changes to move both ARM and i386 MADT > > > > to revision 5. These are not complicated, thankfully. > > > > > > > > Without these changes, the information below shows "how" CPU hotplug > > > > breaks with the current upstream Linux kernel 6.3. For example, a Linux > > > > guest started with: > > > > > > > > qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 30,maxcpus=32 ... > > > > > > > > and then attempting to hotplug a CPU: > > > > > > > > (QEMU) device_add id=cpu30 driver=host-x86_64-cpu socket-id=0 core-id=30 thread-id=0 > > > > > > > > fails with the following: > > > > > > > > APIC: NR_CPUS/possible_cpus limit of 30 reached. Processor 30/0x. > > > > ACPI: Unable to map lapic to logical cpu number > > > > acpi LNXCPU:1e: Enumeration failure > > > > > > > > # dmesg | grep smpboot > > > > smpboot: Allowing 30 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs > > > > smpboot: CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1533 @ 2.10GHz (family: 0x) > > > > smpboot: Max logical packages: 1 > > > > smpboot: Total of 30 processors activated (125708.76 BogoMIPS) > > > > > > > > # iasl -d /sys/firmware/tables/acpi/APIC > > > > [000h 0000 4] Signature : "APIC" [Multiple APIC Descript > > > > [004h 0004 4] Table Length : 00000170 > > > > [008h 0008 1] Revision : 01 <===== > > > > [009h 0009 1] Checksum : 9C > > > > [00Ah 0010 6] Oem ID : "BOCHS " > > > > [010h 0016 8] Oem Table ID : "BXPC " > > > > [018h 0024 4] Oem Revision : 00000001 > > > > [01Ch 0028 4] Asl Compiler ID : "BXPC" > > > > [020h 0032 4] Asl Compiler Revision : 00000001 > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > [114h 0276 1] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > > > > [115h 0277 1] Length : 08 > > > > [116h 0278 1] Processor ID : 1D > > > > [117h 0279 1] Local Apic ID : 1D > > > > [118h 0280 4] Flags (decoded below) : 00000001 > > > > Processor Enabled : 1 <===== > > > > > > > > [11Ch 0284 1] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > > > > [11Dh 0285 1] Length : 08 > > > > [11Eh 0286 1] Processor ID : 1E > > > > [11Fh 0287 1] Local Apic ID : 1E > > > > [120h 0288 4] Flags (decoded below) : 00000000 > > > > Processor Enabled : 0 <===== > > > > > > > > [124h 0292 1] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > > > > [125h 0293 1] Length : 08 > > > > [126h 0294 1] Processor ID : 1F > > > > [127h 0295 1] Local Apic ID : 1F > > > > [128h 0296 4] Flags (decoded below) : 00000000 > > > > Processor Enabled : 0 <===== > > > > > > > > The (latest upstream) Linux kernel sees 30 Enabled processors, and > > > > does not consider processors 31 and 32 to be hotpluggable. > > > > > > > > With this patch series applied, by bumping MADT to revision 5, the > > > > latest upstream Linux kernel correctly identifies 30 CPUs plus 2 > > > > hotpluggable CPUS. > > > > > > > > CPU30 has been hot-added > > > > smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 30 APIC 0x1e > > > > Will online and init hotplugged CPU: 30 > > > > > > > > # dmesg | grep smpboot > > > > smpboot: Allowing 32 CPUs, 2 hotplug CPUs > > > > smpboot: CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1533 @ 2.10GHz (family: 0x6, model: 0x56, stepping: 0x3) > > > > smpboot: Max logical packages: 2 > > > > smpboot: Total of 30 processors activated (125708.76 BogoMIPS) > > > > > > > > # iasl -d /sys/firmware/tables/acpi/APIC > > > > [000h 0000 004h] Signature : "APIC" [Multiple APIC Descript > > > > [004h 0004 004h] Table Length : 00000170 > > > > [008h 0008 001h] Revision : 05 <===== > > > > [009h 0009 001h] Checksum : 94 > > > > [00Ah 0010 006h] Oem ID : "BOCHS " > > > > [010h 0016 008h] Oem Table ID : "BXPC " > > > > [018h 0024 004h] Oem Revision : 00000001 > > > > [01Ch 0028 004h] Asl Compiler ID : "BXPC" > > > > [020h 0032 004h] Asl Compiler Revision : 00000001 > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > [114h 0276 001h] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > > > > [115h 0277 001h] Length : 08 > > > > [116h 0278 001h] Processor ID : 1D > > > > [117h 0279 001h] Local Apic ID : 1D > > > > [118h 0280 004h] Flags (decoded below) : 00000001 > > > > Processor Enabled : 1 <===== > > > > Runtime Online Capable : 0 <===== > > > > > > > > [11Ch 0284 001h] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > > > > [11Dh 0285 001h] Length : 08 > > > > [11Eh 0286 001h] Processor ID : 1E > > > > [11Fh 0287 001h] Local Apic ID : 1E > > > > [120h 0288 004h] Flags (decoded below) : 00000002 > > > > Processor Enabled : 0 <===== > > > > Runtime Online Capable : 1 <===== > > > > > > > > [124h 0292 001h] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] > > > > [125h 0293 001h] Length : 08 > > > > [126h 0294 001h] Processor ID : 1F > > > > [127h 0295 001h] Local Apic ID : 1F > > > > [128h 0296 004h] Flags (decoded below) : 00000002 > > > > Processor Enabled : 0 <===== > > > > Runtime Online Capable : 1 <===== > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Eric > > > > > > Can you please report which guests were tested? > > > > I've been using primarily upstream Linux. Kernels at and before 6.2.0 didn't > > have the "broken" patch mentioned above, and worked (for the reasons cited > > in the patch discussion to "fix" that patch). Any kernel since has the > > "broken" patch and will exhibit the issue. > > > > I've been using q35. > > > > If there are other samples you'd like to see, let me know and I'll try. > > > > Also, my responses will be delayed as I'm traveling the remainder of the week. > > > > Thanks! > > eric > > As a minimum some windows versions. The older the better. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eric DeVolder (2): > > > > hw/acpi: arm: bump MADT to revision 5 > > > > hw/acpi: i386: bump MADT to revision 5 > > > > > > > > hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 6 ++++-- > > > > hw/i386/acpi-common.c | 13 ++++++++++--- > > > > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > -- > > > > 2.31.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
I'm back from travel and catching up. More info below. eric On 3/31/23 11:25, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 12:47:05 -0400 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 08:14:37AM -0500, Eric DeVolder wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 3/29/23 00:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>> Hmm I don't think we can reasonably make such a change for 8.0. >>>> Seems too risky. >>>> Also, I feel we want to have an internal (with "x-" prefix") flag to >>>> revert to old behaviour, in case of breakage on some guests. and maybe >>>> we want to keep old revision for old machine types. >>> Ok, what option name, for keeping old behavior, would you like? >> >> Don't much care. x-madt-rev? > > if it works fine (cold & hot-plug) with older linux/windows guests > I'd rather avoid adding compat knob (we typically do that in ACPI tables > only when change breaks something). > > (as old guest I'd define WinXP sp3 (/me wonders if we still care about > dead EOLed OS) perhaps WS2008 would be a better minimum target these days > and RHEL6 (or some older ACPI enabled kernel with hotplug support)) Thus far I've tested this patch series with the following guests. In both cases below, the guest started with -smp 8,maxcpus=16, and I simply attempted to hot plug and unplug cpu8, with: device_add id=cpu8 driver=host-x86_64-cpu socket-id=0 core-id=8 thread-id=0. 1) Windows Server 2008. In Windows, after logging-in, I close the first full-screen window and then "Server Manager" window pops up. I navigate to left hand pane and choose Diagnostics -> Device Manager -> Processors. I count them before and after. When hotplugging a cpu, you can see the new processor show up in the processor list. That is, it goes from 8 to 9. When hot unplugging the CPU, Windows refuses: The 'Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1533 @ 2.10GHz' device is not removable and cannot be ejected or unplugged. 2) RHEL 6.9 From dmesg: ACPI: APIC 000000007ffe32f0 000F0 (v05 BOCHS BXPC 00000001 BXPC 00000001) SMP: Allowing 16 CPUs, 8 hotplug CPUs # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/online 0-7 (QEMU) device_add ... CPU 8 got hotplugged Booting Node 0 Processor 8 APIC 0x8 kvm-clock: cpu 8, msr 2830ed00 Will online and init hotplugged CPU: 8 microcode: CPU8 sig=0x50663, pf=0x1, revision=0x700001c platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/06-56-03 # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/online 0-8 (QEMU) device_del ... Broke affinity for irq 24 CPU 8 is now offline # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/online 0-7 RHEL 6.9 kernel 2.6.32-696.el6.x86_64 build Feb 21 2017 So with these two older guest OS, it appears to still work. If there are others to be tested, let me know. > >> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:59:24AM -0400, Eric DeVolder wrote: >>>>> The following Linux kernel change broke CPU hotplug for MADT revision >>>>> less than 5. >>>>> >>>>> commit e2869bd7af60 ("x86/acpi/boot: Do not register processors that cannot be onlined for x2APIC") >>>> >>>> Presumably it's being fixed? Link to discussion? Patch fixing that in >>>> Linux? >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20230327191026.3454-1-eric.devolder@oracle.com/T/#t >> >> Great! Maybe stick a Link: tag in the commit log. Sure, will include that with v2. > > So it's guest bug which is in process of being fixed. > (i.e. QEMU technically correct as long as MADT revision < 5) Iiuc, if QEMU generates x2apic tables with .revision = 1, that is not correct (as x2APIC shows up in .revision=3). But if QEMU generates, apic, sapic, or x2apic tables with .revision = 5, that is correct (as all are valid options thru .revision 5). > > In this case I'd not touch x86 MADT at all (It should be upto > downstream distros to fix guest kernel). Fwiw, this has been fixed and should show up in 6.3-rc6 this weekend. > > Probably the same applies to ARM variant > i.e. we should bump rev only when current one gets in the way > (aka we are pulling in new fields/definitions from new version) > > >>>>> As part of the investigation into resolving this breakage, I learned >>>>> that i386 QEMU reports revision 1, while technically it is at revision 3. >>>>> (Arm QEMU reports revision 4, and that is valid/correct.) >>>>> >>>>> ACPI 6.3 bumps MADT revision to 5 as it introduces an Online Capable >>>>> flag that the above Linux patch utilizes to denote hot pluggable CPUs. >>>>> >>>>> So in order to bump MADT to the current revision of 5, need to >>>>> validate that all MADT table changes between 1 and 5 are present >>>>> in QEMU. >>>>> >>>>> Below is a table summarizing the changes to the MADT. This information >>>>> gleamed from the ACPI specs on uefi.org. >>>>> >>>>> ACPI MADT What >>>>> Version Version >>>>> 1.0 MADT not present >>>>> 2.0 1 Section 5.2.10.4 >>>>> 3.0 2 Section 5.2.11.4 >>>>> 5.2.11.13 Local SAPIC Structure added two new fields: >>>>> ACPI Processor UID Value >>>>> ACPI Processor UID String >>>>> 5.2.10.14 Platform Interrupt Sources Structure: >>>>> Reserved changed to Platform Interrupt Sources Flags >>>>> 3.0b 2 Section 5.2.11.4 >>>>> Added a section describing guidelines for the ordering of >>>>> processors in the MADT to support proper boot processor >>>>> and multi-threaded logical processor operation. >>>>> 4.0 3 Section 5.2.12 >>>>> Adds Processor Local x2APIC structure type 9 >>>>> Adds Local x2APIC NMI structure type 0xA >>>>> 5.0 3 Section 5.2.12 >>>>> 6.0 3 Section 5.2.12 >>>>> 6.0a 4 Section 5.2.12 >>>>> Adds ARM GIC structure types 0xB-0xF >>>>> 6.2a 45 Section 5.2.12 <--- yep it says version 45! >>>>> 6.2b 5 Section 5.2.12 >>>>> GIC ITS last Reserved offset changed to 16 from 20 (typo) >>>>> 6.3 5 Section 5.2.12 >>>>> Adds Local APIC Flags Online Capable! >>>>> Adds GICC SPE Overflow Interrupt field >>>>> 6.4 5 Section 5.2.12 >>>>> Adds Multiprocessor Wakeup Structure type 0x10 >>>>> (change notes says structure previously misplaced?) >>>>> 6.5 5 Section 5.2.12 >>>>> >>>>> For the MADT revision change 1 -> 2, the spec has a change to the >>>>> SAPIC structure. In general, QEMU does not generate/support SAPIC. >>>>> So the QEMU i386 MADT revision can safely be moved to 2. >>>>> >>>>> For the MADT revision change 2 -> 3, the spec adds Local x2APIC >>>>> structures. QEMU has long supported x2apic ACPI structures. A simple >>>>> search of x2apic within QEMU source and hw/i386/acpi-common.c >>>>> specifically reveals this. >>>> >>>> But not unconditionally. >>> >>> I don't think that reporting revision 3 requires that generation of x2apic; >>> one could still see apic, x2apic, or sapic in theory. I realize qemu doesn't >>> do sapic... >>> >>>> >>>>> So the QEMU i386 MADT revision can safely >>>>> be moved to 3. >>>>> >>>>> For the MADT revision change 3 -> 4, the spec adds support for the ARM >>>>> GIC structures. QEMU ARM does in fact generate and report revision 4. >>>>> As these will not be used by i386 QEMU, so then the QEMU i386 MADT >>>>> revision can safely be moved to 4 as well. >>>>> >>>>> Now for the MADT revision change 4 -> 5, the spec adds the Online >>>>> Capable flag to the Local APIC structure, and the ARM GICC SPE >>>>> Overflow Interrupt field. >>>>> >>>>> For the ARM SPE, an existing 3-byte Reserved field is broken into a 1- >>>>> byte Reserved field and a 2-byte SPE field. The spec says that is SPE >>>>> Overflow is not supported, it should be zero. >>>>> >>>>> For the i386 Local APIC flag Online Capable, the spec has certain rules >>>>> about this value. And in particuar setting this value now explicitly >>>>> indicates a hotpluggable CPU. >>>>> >>>>> So this patch makes the needed changes to move both ARM and i386 MADT >>>>> to revision 5. These are not complicated, thankfully. >>>>> >>>>> Without these changes, the information below shows "how" CPU hotplug >>>>> breaks with the current upstream Linux kernel 6.3. For example, a Linux >>>>> guest started with: >>>>> >>>>> qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 30,maxcpus=32 ... >>>>> >>>>> and then attempting to hotplug a CPU: >>>>> >>>>> (QEMU) device_add id=cpu30 driver=host-x86_64-cpu socket-id=0 core-id=30 thread-id=0 >>>>> >>>>> fails with the following: >>>>> >>>>> APIC: NR_CPUS/possible_cpus limit of 30 reached. Processor 30/0x. >>>>> ACPI: Unable to map lapic to logical cpu number >>>>> acpi LNXCPU:1e: Enumeration failure >>>>> >>>>> # dmesg | grep smpboot >>>>> smpboot: Allowing 30 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs >>>>> smpboot: CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1533 @ 2.10GHz (family: 0x) >>>>> smpboot: Max logical packages: 1 >>>>> smpboot: Total of 30 processors activated (125708.76 BogoMIPS) >>>>> >>>>> # iasl -d /sys/firmware/tables/acpi/APIC >>>>> [000h 0000 4] Signature : "APIC" [Multiple APIC Descript >>>>> [004h 0004 4] Table Length : 00000170 >>>>> [008h 0008 1] Revision : 01 <===== >>>>> [009h 0009 1] Checksum : 9C >>>>> [00Ah 0010 6] Oem ID : "BOCHS " >>>>> [010h 0016 8] Oem Table ID : "BXPC " >>>>> [018h 0024 4] Oem Revision : 00000001 >>>>> [01Ch 0028 4] Asl Compiler ID : "BXPC" >>>>> [020h 0032 4] Asl Compiler Revision : 00000001 >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> [114h 0276 1] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] >>>>> [115h 0277 1] Length : 08 >>>>> [116h 0278 1] Processor ID : 1D >>>>> [117h 0279 1] Local Apic ID : 1D >>>>> [118h 0280 4] Flags (decoded below) : 00000001 >>>>> Processor Enabled : 1 <===== >>>>> >>>>> [11Ch 0284 1] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] >>>>> [11Dh 0285 1] Length : 08 >>>>> [11Eh 0286 1] Processor ID : 1E >>>>> [11Fh 0287 1] Local Apic ID : 1E >>>>> [120h 0288 4] Flags (decoded below) : 00000000 >>>>> Processor Enabled : 0 <===== >>>>> >>>>> [124h 0292 1] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] >>>>> [125h 0293 1] Length : 08 >>>>> [126h 0294 1] Processor ID : 1F >>>>> [127h 0295 1] Local Apic ID : 1F >>>>> [128h 0296 4] Flags (decoded below) : 00000000 >>>>> Processor Enabled : 0 <===== >>>>> >>>>> The (latest upstream) Linux kernel sees 30 Enabled processors, and >>>>> does not consider processors 31 and 32 to be hotpluggable. >>>>> >>>>> With this patch series applied, by bumping MADT to revision 5, the >>>>> latest upstream Linux kernel correctly identifies 30 CPUs plus 2 >>>>> hotpluggable CPUS. >>>>> >>>>> CPU30 has been hot-added >>>>> smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 30 APIC 0x1e >>>>> Will online and init hotplugged CPU: 30 >>>>> >>>>> # dmesg | grep smpboot >>>>> smpboot: Allowing 32 CPUs, 2 hotplug CPUs >>>>> smpboot: CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU D-1533 @ 2.10GHz (family: 0x6, model: 0x56, stepping: 0x3) >>>>> smpboot: Max logical packages: 2 >>>>> smpboot: Total of 30 processors activated (125708.76 BogoMIPS) >>>>> >>>>> # iasl -d /sys/firmware/tables/acpi/APIC >>>>> [000h 0000 004h] Signature : "APIC" [Multiple APIC Descript >>>>> [004h 0004 004h] Table Length : 00000170 >>>>> [008h 0008 001h] Revision : 05 <===== >>>>> [009h 0009 001h] Checksum : 94 >>>>> [00Ah 0010 006h] Oem ID : "BOCHS " >>>>> [010h 0016 008h] Oem Table ID : "BXPC " >>>>> [018h 0024 004h] Oem Revision : 00000001 >>>>> [01Ch 0028 004h] Asl Compiler ID : "BXPC" >>>>> [020h 0032 004h] Asl Compiler Revision : 00000001 >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> [114h 0276 001h] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] >>>>> [115h 0277 001h] Length : 08 >>>>> [116h 0278 001h] Processor ID : 1D >>>>> [117h 0279 001h] Local Apic ID : 1D >>>>> [118h 0280 004h] Flags (decoded below) : 00000001 >>>>> Processor Enabled : 1 <===== >>>>> Runtime Online Capable : 0 <===== >>>>> >>>>> [11Ch 0284 001h] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] >>>>> [11Dh 0285 001h] Length : 08 >>>>> [11Eh 0286 001h] Processor ID : 1E >>>>> [11Fh 0287 001h] Local Apic ID : 1E >>>>> [120h 0288 004h] Flags (decoded below) : 00000002 >>>>> Processor Enabled : 0 <===== >>>>> Runtime Online Capable : 1 <===== >>>>> >>>>> [124h 0292 001h] Subtable Type : 00 [Processor Local APIC] >>>>> [125h 0293 001h] Length : 08 >>>>> [126h 0294 001h] Processor ID : 1F >>>>> [127h 0295 001h] Local Apic ID : 1F >>>>> [128h 0296 004h] Flags (decoded below) : 00000002 >>>>> Processor Enabled : 0 <===== >>>>> Runtime Online Capable : 1 <===== >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Eric >>>> >>>> Can you please report which guests were tested? >>> >>> I've been using primarily upstream Linux. Kernels at and before 6.2.0 didn't >>> have the "broken" patch mentioned above, and worked (for the reasons cited >>> in the patch discussion to "fix" that patch). Any kernel since has the >>> "broken" patch and will exhibit the issue. >>> >>> I've been using q35. >>> >>> If there are other samples you'd like to see, let me know and I'll try. >>> >>> Also, my responses will be delayed as I'm traveling the remainder of the week. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> eric >> >> As a minimum some windows versions. The older the better. >> >> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Eric DeVolder (2): >>>>> hw/acpi: arm: bump MADT to revision 5 >>>>> hw/acpi: i386: bump MADT to revision 5 >>>>> >>>>> hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 6 ++++-- >>>>> hw/i386/acpi-common.c | 13 ++++++++++--- >>>>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> 2.31.1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >