Message ID | 20230919201857.675913-1-victortoso@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Validate and test qapi examples | expand |
Victor Toso <victortoso@redhat.com> writes: > Hi, > > v2: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-09/msg02383.html > > - Sorry Markus, I kept the two last 'fix example' patches as I don't > fully remember how we should go with it. That's fine. I see two sane alternatives: 1. Add suitable elision syntax. Happy to discuss details, but I think we should discuss my review of PATCH 10 before we complicate matters further. 2. Decide we don't need elisions. Delete the ones we have. I'd like to see an argument that the ones we have are not helpful enough to justfify the effort to keep them. > Not taking them but taking > the generator would be bad as we would fail the build. Understood. [...]