From patchwork Fri Nov 22 06:21:31 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: EwanHai X-Patchwork-Id: 13882892 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CE63E65D35 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 08:55:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tEPRJ-0000SW-7h; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 03:54:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tEPRF-0000RQ-Ha for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 03:54:54 -0500 Received: from mx1.zhaoxin.com ([210.0.225.12]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tEPRD-0005Jz-Cp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 03:54:53 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1732265670-086e2312d603810001-jgbH7p Received: from ZXSHMBX3.zhaoxin.com (ZXSHMBX3.zhaoxin.com [10.28.252.165]) by mx1.zhaoxin.com with ESMTP id tRYtahXSRVfPVcoX (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 22 Nov 2024 16:54:31 +0800 (CST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: EwanHai-oc@zhaoxin.com X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 10.28.252.165 Received: from ZXSHMBX1.zhaoxin.com (10.28.252.163) by ZXSHMBX3.zhaoxin.com (10.28.252.165) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 16:54:30 +0800 Received: from ZXSHMBX1.zhaoxin.com ([fe80::3066:e339:e3d6:5264]) by ZXSHMBX1.zhaoxin.com ([fe80::3066:e339:e3d6:5264%7]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.039; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 16:54:30 +0800 X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 10.28.252.165 Received: from ewan-server.zhaoxin.com (10.28.66.62) by zxbjmbx1.zhaoxin.com (10.29.252.163) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.39; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 14:21:36 +0800 From: EwanHai To: , CC: , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH RESEND v4 0/4] Add support for Zhaoxin Yongfeng CPU model and Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 01:21:31 -0500 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: [PATCH RESEND v4 0/4] Add support for Zhaoxin Yongfeng CPU model and Message-ID: <20241122062135.479200-1-ewanhai-oc@zhaoxin.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.28.66.62] X-ClientProxiedBy: zxbjmbx1.zhaoxin.com (10.29.252.163) To zxbjmbx1.zhaoxin.com (10.29.252.163) X-Moderation-Data: 11/22/2024 4:54:29 PM X-Barracuda-Connect: ZXSHMBX3.zhaoxin.com[10.28.252.165] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1732265670 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 X-Barracuda-URL: https://10.28.252.35:4443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at zhaoxin.com X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 2295 X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.133532 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Received-SPF: pass client-ip=210.0.225.12; envelope-from=EwanHai-oc@zhaoxin.com; helo=mx1.zhaoxin.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org This patch series introduces support for the Zhaoxin Yongfeng CPU model and includes improvements and updates specific to Zhaoxin CPUs (including vendor "Centaurhauls" and "Shanghai"). The changes ensure that QEMU can correctly identify and emulate Zhaoxin CPUs, accurately reflecting their functionality and performance characteristics. ### Summary of changes EwanHai (4): target/i386: Add support for Zhaoxin CPU vendor identification target/i386: Add CPUID leaf 0xC000_0001 EDX definitions target/i386: Introduce Zhaoxin Yongfeng CPU model target/i386: Mask CMPLegacy bit in CPUID[0x80000001].ECX for Zhaoxin CPUs target/i386/cpu.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- target/i386/cpu.h | 41 ++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) v4 -> v3: 1. Added "For the kernel before v6.9 ..." for more accurately describe the patch's impact on Linux Guests. v3 link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240809094259.119221-1-ewanhai- oc@zhaoxin.com/ v3 -> v2: 1. Added a more detailed description of the CPUID[0x80000001].ECX.CMPLegacy bit masking. v2 link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240704112511.184257-1-ewanhai-oc@zhaoxin.com/ v2 -> v1: 1. Removed VIA-related information from the patch description to avoid misunderstanding. 2. Replaced CPUID_VENDOR_VIA with CPUID_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN1 because the "Centaurhauls" vendor ID now belongs to Zhaoxin.The previous CPUID_VENDOR_VIA macro was only defined but never used in QEMU, making this change straightforward. v1 link: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20240625091905.1325205-1-ewanhai- oc@zhaoxin.com/ ### Known Issues 1. Issue with VMX Preemption Timer Rate on Yongfeng CPU: - Description: On Yongfeng CPUs, the VMX preemption timer rate is 128, meaning that bits 4:0 of MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC_CTLS should be set to 7. However, due to Intel's rate being 5, the Linux kernel has hardcoded this value as 5: `#define VMX_MISC_EMULATED_PREEMPTION_TIMER_RATE 5`. - Impact: This discrepancy can cause incorrect behavior in the VMX preemption timer on Yongfeng CPUs. - Workaround: A patch to correct this issue in the Linux kernel is currently being prepared and will be submitted soon.