Message ID | cover.1570705279.git.pkrempa@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <SRS0=JAHa=YD=nongnu.org=qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@kernel.org> Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB78E139A for <patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B3F7206A1 for <patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:06:24 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8B3F7206A1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:36049 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org>) id 1iIWH1-000648-Ho for patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:06:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47069) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <pkrempa@redhat.com>) id 1iIWG9-00057o-QV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:05:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <pkrempa@redhat.com>) id 1iIWG8-0000rw-AM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:05:29 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36476) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <pkrempa@redhat.com>) id 1iIWG8-0000qN-4u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:05:28 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 538903086E2F for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from angien.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.43.2.229]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FABC60BE1; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:05:25 +0000 (UTC) From: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] qapi: Add detection for the 'savevm' fix for blockdev Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 13:05:21 +0200 Message-Id: <cover.1570705279.git.pkrempa@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.44]); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel> List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" <qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org> |
Series |
qapi: Add detection for the 'savevm' fix for blockdev
|
expand
|
I have two simple question on PATCH 2, two straightforward refactorings to reduce code duplication, and one commit message tweak. Answer my questions, and then we can decide whether we want a respin or touch-ups in my tree. Thanks!