diff mbox

[PULL,1/2] xen/blkif: avoid double access to any shared ring request fields

Message ID 1465916738-15687-1-git-send-email-sstabellini@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Stefano Stabellini June 14, 2016, 3:05 p.m. UTC
From: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>

Commit f9e98e5d7a ("xen/blkif: Avoid double access to
src->nr_segments") didn't go far enough: src->operation is also being
used twice. And nothing was done to prevent the compiler from using the
source side of the copy done by blk_get_request() (granted that's very
unlikely).

Move the barrier()s up, and add another one to blk_get_request().

Note that for completing XSA-155, the barrier() getting added to
blk_get_request() would suffice, and hence the changes to xen_blkif.h
are more like just cleanup. And since, as said, the unpatched code
getting compiled to something vulnerable is very unlikely (and not
observed in practice), this isn't being viewed as a new security issue.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
---
 hw/block/xen_blkif.h | 12 ++++++------
 hw/block/xen_disk.c  |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/hw/block/xen_blkif.h b/hw/block/xen_blkif.h
index c68487cb..e3b133b 100644
--- a/hw/block/xen_blkif.h
+++ b/hw/block/xen_blkif.h
@@ -79,14 +79,14 @@  static inline void blkif_get_x86_32_req(blkif_request_t *dst, blkif_x86_32_reque
 	dst->handle = src->handle;
 	dst->id = src->id;
 	dst->sector_number = src->sector_number;
-	if (src->operation == BLKIF_OP_DISCARD) {
+	/* Prevent the compiler from using src->... instead. */
+	barrier();
+	if (dst->operation == BLKIF_OP_DISCARD) {
 		struct blkif_request_discard *s = (void *)src;
 		struct blkif_request_discard *d = (void *)dst;
 		d->nr_sectors = s->nr_sectors;
 		return;
 	}
-	/* prevent the compiler from optimizing the code and using src->nr_segments instead */
-	barrier();
 	if (n > dst->nr_segments)
 		n = dst->nr_segments;
 	for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
@@ -102,14 +102,14 @@  static inline void blkif_get_x86_64_req(blkif_request_t *dst, blkif_x86_64_reque
 	dst->handle = src->handle;
 	dst->id = src->id;
 	dst->sector_number = src->sector_number;
-	if (src->operation == BLKIF_OP_DISCARD) {
+	/* Prevent the compiler from using src->... instead. */
+	barrier();
+	if (dst->operation == BLKIF_OP_DISCARD) {
 		struct blkif_request_discard *s = (void *)src;
 		struct blkif_request_discard *d = (void *)dst;
 		d->nr_sectors = s->nr_sectors;
 		return;
 	}
-	/* prevent the compiler from optimizing the code and using src->nr_segments instead */
-	barrier();
 	if (n > dst->nr_segments)
 		n = dst->nr_segments;
 	for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
diff --git a/hw/block/xen_disk.c b/hw/block/xen_disk.c
index 064c116..cf57814 100644
--- a/hw/block/xen_disk.c
+++ b/hw/block/xen_disk.c
@@ -679,6 +679,8 @@  static int blk_get_request(struct XenBlkDev *blkdev, struct ioreq *ioreq, RING_I
                              RING_GET_REQUEST(&blkdev->rings.x86_64_part, rc));
         break;
     }
+    /* Prevent the compiler from accessing the on-ring fields instead. */
+    barrier();
     return 0;
 }