From patchwork Fri Nov 11 03:01:36 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Cao jin X-Patchwork-Id: 9422387 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02786022E for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 02:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF10D2985D for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 02:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id E3E56298C2; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 02:59:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F77D2985D for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 02:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50434 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c523o-00025S-6l for patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 21:59:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42925) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c523Q-00025H-4d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 21:59:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c523L-0001Y0-Kl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 21:59:00 -0500 Received: from [59.151.112.132] (port=33959 helo=heian.cn.fujitsu.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c523L-0001XX-8V; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 21:58:55 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,518,1449504000"; d="scan'208";a="12875351" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 11 Nov 2016 10:58:52 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXCHPEKD03.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.85]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE1543972C6; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 10:58:49 +0800 (CST) Received: from G08FNSTD140223.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.226.69) by G08CNEXCHPEKD03.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.279.2; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 10:58:49 +0800 From: Cao jin To: , Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 11:01:36 +0800 Message-ID: <1478833296-25853-1-git-send-email-caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.167.226.69] X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: 3CE1543972C6.AB2C5 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 59.151.112.132 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] vfio: remove a duplicated word in comments X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Signed-off-by: Cao jin --- hw/vfio/pci.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c index 31aaecb..c94987c 100644 --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c @@ -1881,8 +1881,8 @@ static void vfio_add_ext_cap(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev) * 0 is reserved for this since absence of capabilities is indicated by * 0 for the ID, version, AND next pointer. However, pcie_add_capability() * uses ID 0 as reserved for list management and will incorrectly match and - * assert if we attempt to pre-load the head of the chain with with this - * ID. Use ID 0xFFFF temporarily since it is also seems to be reserved in + * assert if we attempt to pre-load the head of the chain with this ID. + * Use ID 0xFFFF temporarily since it is also seems to be reserved in * part for identifying absence of capabilities in a root complex register * block. If the ID still exists after adding capabilities, switch back to * zero. We'll mark this entire first dword as emulated for this purpose.