@@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ static void colo_compare_connection(void *opaque, void *user_data)
while (!g_queue_is_empty(&conn->primary_list) &&
!g_queue_is_empty(&conn->secondary_list)) {
- pkt = g_queue_pop_tail(&conn->primary_list);
+ pkt = g_queue_pop_head(&conn->primary_list);
switch (conn->ip_proto) {
case IPPROTO_TCP:
result = g_queue_find_custom(&conn->secondary_list,
@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ static void colo_compare_connection(void *opaque, void *user_data)
* until next comparison.
*/
trace_colo_compare_main("packet different");
- g_queue_push_tail(&conn->primary_list, pkt);
+ g_queue_push_head(&conn->primary_list, pkt);
/* TODO: colo_notify_checkpoint();*/
break;
}
The packet_enqueue() use g_queue_push_tail() to enqueue net packet, so it is more efficent way use g_queue_pop_head() to get packet for compare. That will improve the success rate of comparison. In my test the performance of ftp put 1000M file will increase 10% Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- net/colo-compare.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)