Message ID | 1563950742-22592-1-git-send-email-chihmin.chao@sifive.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v3] tests/boot_linux_console: add a test for riscv64 + virt | expand |
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:46 PM Chih-Min Chao <chihmin.chao@sifive.com> wrote: > > Similar to the mips + malta test, it boots a Linux kernel on a virt > board and verify the serial is working. Also, it relies on the serial > device set by the machine itself. > > If riscv64 is a target being built, "make check-acceptance" will > automatically include this test by the use of the "arch:riscv64" tags. > > Alternatively, this test can be run using: > > $ avocado run -t arch:riscv64 tests/acceptance > > packages > debian official > binutils-riscv64-linux-gnu_2.32-8 > opensbi_0.4-1_all > linux-image-5.0.0-trunk-riscv64 5.0.2-1~exp1 > third-party > https://github.com/groeck/linux-build-test/rootfs/riscv64/rootfs.cpio.gz > (the repo is also used in mips target acceptance) > > Signed-off-by: Chih-Min Chao <chihmin.chao@sifive.com> > --- > .travis.yml | 2 +- > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml > index caf0a1f..7ba9952 100644 > --- a/.travis.yml > +++ b/.travis.yml > @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ matrix: > > # Acceptance (Functional) tests > - env: > - - CONFIG="--python=/usr/bin/python3 --target-list=x86_64-softmmu,mips-softmmu,mips64el-softmmu,aarch64-softmmu,arm-softmmu,s390x-softmmu,alpha-softmmu" > + - CONFIG="--python=/usr/bin/python3 --target-list=x86_64-softmmu,mips-softmmu,mips64el-softmmu,aarch64-softmmu,arm-softmmu,s390x-softmmu,alpha-softmmu,riscv64-softmmu" > - TEST_CMD="make check-acceptance" > after_failure: > - cat tests/results/latest/job.log > diff --git a/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py b/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py > index 3215950..b0569b9 100644 > --- a/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py > +++ b/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py > @@ -354,3 +354,70 @@ class BootLinuxConsole(Test): > self.vm.launch() > console_pattern = 'Kernel command line: %s' % kernel_command_line > self.wait_for_console_pattern(console_pattern) > + > + def test_riscv64_virt(self): > + """ > + :avocado: tags=arch:riscv64 > + :avocado: tags=machine:virt > + """ > + deb_url = ('https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/' > + '20190424T171759Z/pool/main/b/binutils/' > + 'binutils-riscv64-linux-gnu_2.32-8_amd64.deb') > + deb_hash = ('7fe376fd4452696c03acd508d6d613ca553ea15e') > + deb_path = self.fetch_asset(deb_url, asset_hash=deb_hash) > + objcopy_path = '/usr/bin/riscv64-linux-gnu-objcopy' > + objcopy_path = self.extract_from_deb(deb_path, objcopy_path) > + libbfd_path = '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd-2.32-riscv64.so' > + libbfd_path = self.extract_from_deb(deb_path, libbfd_path) > + process.run('ls -al %s' % (objcopy_path)) Why do we need objcopy? Won't this not work on non x86 architectures? > + > + deb_url = ('https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/' > + '20190708T032337Z/pool/main/o/opensbi/' > + 'opensbi_0.4-1_all.deb') > + deb_hash = ('2319dcd702958291d323acf5649fd98a11d90112') > + deb_path = self.fetch_asset(deb_url, asset_hash=deb_hash) > + opensbi_path = ('/usr/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/opensbi/' > + 'qemu/virt/fw_jump.elf') > + opensbi_path = self.extract_from_deb(deb_path, opensbi_path) > + > + deb_url = ('https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian-ports/' > + '20190319T205124Z/pool-riscv64/main/l/linux/' > + 'linux-image-5.0.0-trunk-riscv64_5.0.2-1~exp1_riscv64.deb') > + deb_hash = ('90155ed4b36673cbf7746a37cf3159c8f0b2857a') > + deb_path = self.fetch_asset(deb_url, asset_hash=deb_hash) > + kernel_path = '/boot/vmlinux-5.0.0-trunk-riscv64' I thought we were swapping to using an Image file? Alistair > + kernel_path = self.extract_from_deb(deb_path, kernel_path) > + kimage_path = self.workdir + "/Image" > + env = os.environ > + env['LD_LIBRARY_PATH'] = ('%s:' % (os.path.dirname(libbfd_path)) + > + env.get('LD_LIBRARY_PATH', '')) > + process.run(('%s -O binary -O binary -R' > + '.note -R .note.gnu.build-id -R .comment -S %s %s') % > + (objcopy_path, kernel_path, kimage_path)) > + > + initrd_url = ('https://github.com/groeck/linux-build-test/raw/' > + '8584a59ed9e5eb5ee7ca91f6d74bbb06619205b8/rootfs/' > + 'riscv64/rootfs.cpio.gz') > + initrd_hash = 'f4867d263754961b6f626cdcdc0cb334c47e3b49' > + initrd_path = self.fetch_asset(initrd_url, asset_hash=initrd_hash) > + > + self.vm.set_machine('virt') > + self.vm.set_console() > + kernel_command_line = (self.KERNEL_COMMON_COMMAND_LINE > + + 'console=ttyS0 noreboot') > + self.vm.add_args('-bios', "none", > + '-kernel', opensbi_path, > + '-device', 'loader,file=%s,addr=0x80200000' % (kimage_path), > + '-initrd', initrd_path, > + '-append', kernel_command_line, > + '-no-reboot') > + > + self.vm.launch() > + self.wait_for_console_pattern('Boot successful.') > + > + self.exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern('cat /proc/cpuinfo', > + 'isa') > + self.exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern('uname -a', > + 'SMP Debian') > + self.exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern('reboot', > + 'reboot: Restarting system') > -- > 2.7.4 > >
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 8:12 AM Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:46 PM Chih-Min Chao <chihmin.chao@sifive.com> > wrote: > > > > Similar to the mips + malta test, it boots a Linux kernel on a virt > > board and verify the serial is working. Also, it relies on the serial > > device set by the machine itself. > > > > If riscv64 is a target being built, "make check-acceptance" will > > automatically include this test by the use of the "arch:riscv64" tags. > > > > Alternatively, this test can be run using: > > > > $ avocado run -t arch:riscv64 tests/acceptance > > > > packages > > debian official > > binutils-riscv64-linux-gnu_2.32-8 > > opensbi_0.4-1_all > > linux-image-5.0.0-trunk-riscv64 5.0.2-1~exp1 > > third-party > > > https://github.com/groeck/linux-build-test/rootfs/riscv64/rootfs.cpio.gz > > (the repo is also used in mips target acceptance) > > > > Signed-off-by: Chih-Min Chao <chihmin.chao@sifive.com> > > --- > > .travis.yml | 2 +- > > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py | 67 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml > > index caf0a1f..7ba9952 100644 > > --- a/.travis.yml > > +++ b/.travis.yml > > @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ matrix: > > > > # Acceptance (Functional) tests > > - env: > > - - CONFIG="--python=/usr/bin/python3 > --target-list=x86_64-softmmu,mips-softmmu,mips64el-softmmu,aarch64-softmmu,arm-softmmu,s390x-softmmu,alpha-softmmu" > > + - CONFIG="--python=/usr/bin/python3 > --target-list=x86_64-softmmu,mips-softmmu,mips64el-softmmu,aarch64-softmmu,arm-softmmu,s390x-softmmu,alpha-softmmu,riscv64-softmmu" > > - TEST_CMD="make check-acceptance" > > after_failure: > > - cat tests/results/latest/job.log > > diff --git a/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py > b/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py > > index 3215950..b0569b9 100644 > > --- a/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py > > +++ b/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py > > @@ -354,3 +354,70 @@ class BootLinuxConsole(Test): > > self.vm.launch() > > console_pattern = 'Kernel command line: %s' % > kernel_command_line > > self.wait_for_console_pattern(console_pattern) > > + > > + def test_riscv64_virt(self): > > + """ > > + :avocado: tags=arch:riscv64 > > + :avocado: tags=machine:virt > > + """ > > + deb_url = ('https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/' > > + '20190424T171759Z/pool/main/b/binutils/' > > + 'binutils-riscv64-linux-gnu_2.32-8_amd64.deb') > > + deb_hash = ('7fe376fd4452696c03acd508d6d613ca553ea15e') > > + deb_path = self.fetch_asset(deb_url, asset_hash=deb_hash) > > + objcopy_path = '/usr/bin/riscv64-linux-gnu-objcopy' > > + objcopy_path = self.extract_from_deb(deb_path, objcopy_path) > > + libbfd_path = '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd-2.32-riscv64.so > ' > > + libbfd_path = self.extract_from_deb(deb_path, libbfd_path) > > + process.run('ls -al %s' % (objcopy_path)) > > Why do we need objcopy? Won't this not work on non x86 architectures? > > > + > > + deb_url = ('https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/' > > + '20190708T032337Z/pool/main/o/opensbi/' > > + 'opensbi_0.4-1_all.deb') > > + deb_hash = ('2319dcd702958291d323acf5649fd98a11d90112') > > + deb_path = self.fetch_asset(deb_url, asset_hash=deb_hash) > > + opensbi_path = ('/usr/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/opensbi/' > > + 'qemu/virt/fw_jump.elf') > > + opensbi_path = self.extract_from_deb(deb_path, opensbi_path) > > + > > + deb_url = ('https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian-ports/' > > + '20190319T205124Z/pool-riscv64/main/l/linux/' > > + > 'linux-image-5.0.0-trunk-riscv64_5.0.2-1~exp1_riscv64.deb') > > + deb_hash = ('90155ed4b36673cbf7746a37cf3159c8f0b2857a') > > + deb_path = self.fetch_asset(deb_url, asset_hash=deb_hash) > > + kernel_path = '/boot/vmlinux-5.0.0-trunk-riscv64' > > I thought we were swapping to using an Image file? > > Alistair > > For objcopy, Philippe had the same question in PATCH v2 thread. Debian linux-kernel package only has vmlinux and riscv vmlinux ELF header doesn't contain the correct physical loading address 0x8020_0000. What I think is to extract the Image from vmlinux by objcopy. This is what kernel do when generating arch/riscv/boot/Image. For swapping to using an image file, I think what you talk about is we have included opensbi.bin into qemu master ? The reason is the test use -initrd and -append to pass rootfs and kernel command line option and the two options requires using of -kernel option. But -kernel option can't load the opensbi.bin to expected address. chihmin > > + kernel_path = self.extract_from_deb(deb_path, kernel_path) > > + kimage_path = self.workdir + "/Image" > > + env = os.environ > > + env['LD_LIBRARY_PATH'] = ('%s:' % > (os.path.dirname(libbfd_path)) + > > + env.get('LD_LIBRARY_PATH', '')) > > + process.run(('%s -O binary -O binary -R' > > + '.note -R .note.gnu.build-id -R .comment -S %s > %s') % > > + (objcopy_path, kernel_path, kimage_path)) > > + > > + initrd_url = ('https://github.com/groeck/linux-build-test/raw/' > > + '8584a59ed9e5eb5ee7ca91f6d74bbb06619205b8/rootfs/' > > + 'riscv64/rootfs.cpio.gz') > > + initrd_hash = 'f4867d263754961b6f626cdcdc0cb334c47e3b49' > > + initrd_path = self.fetch_asset(initrd_url, > asset_hash=initrd_hash) > > + > > + self.vm.set_machine('virt') > > + self.vm.set_console() > > + kernel_command_line = (self.KERNEL_COMMON_COMMAND_LINE > > + + 'console=ttyS0 noreboot') > > + self.vm.add_args('-bios', "none", > > + '-kernel', opensbi_path, > > + '-device', 'loader,file=%s,addr=0x80200000' % > (kimage_path), > > + '-initrd', initrd_path, > > + '-append', kernel_command_line, > > + '-no-reboot') > > + > > + self.vm.launch() > > + self.wait_for_console_pattern('Boot successful.') > > + > > + self.exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern('cat /proc/cpuinfo', > > + 'isa') > > + self.exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern('uname -a', > > + 'SMP Debian') > > + self.exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern('reboot', > > + 'reboot: Restarting > system') > > -- > > 2.7.4 > > > > >
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 10:12 AM Chih-Min Chao <chihmin.chao@sifive.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 8:12 AM Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:46 PM Chih-Min Chao <chihmin.chao@sifive.com> wrote: >> > >> > Similar to the mips + malta test, it boots a Linux kernel on a virt >> > board and verify the serial is working. Also, it relies on the serial >> > device set by the machine itself. >> > >> > If riscv64 is a target being built, "make check-acceptance" will >> > automatically include this test by the use of the "arch:riscv64" tags. >> > >> > Alternatively, this test can be run using: >> > >> > $ avocado run -t arch:riscv64 tests/acceptance >> > >> > packages >> > debian official >> > binutils-riscv64-linux-gnu_2.32-8 >> > opensbi_0.4-1_all >> > linux-image-5.0.0-trunk-riscv64 5.0.2-1~exp1 >> > third-party >> > https://github.com/groeck/linux-build-test/rootfs/riscv64/rootfs.cpio.gz >> > (the repo is also used in mips target acceptance) >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Chih-Min Chao <chihmin.chao@sifive.com> >> > --- >> > .travis.yml | 2 +- >> > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml >> > index caf0a1f..7ba9952 100644 >> > --- a/.travis.yml >> > +++ b/.travis.yml >> > @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ matrix: >> > >> > # Acceptance (Functional) tests >> > - env: >> > - - CONFIG="--python=/usr/bin/python3 --target-list=x86_64-softmmu,mips-softmmu,mips64el-softmmu,aarch64-softmmu,arm-softmmu,s390x-softmmu,alpha-softmmu" >> > + - CONFIG="--python=/usr/bin/python3 --target-list=x86_64-softmmu,mips-softmmu,mips64el-softmmu,aarch64-softmmu,arm-softmmu,s390x-softmmu,alpha-softmmu,riscv64-softmmu" >> > - TEST_CMD="make check-acceptance" >> > after_failure: >> > - cat tests/results/latest/job.log >> > diff --git a/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py b/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py >> > index 3215950..b0569b9 100644 >> > --- a/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py >> > +++ b/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py >> > @@ -354,3 +354,70 @@ class BootLinuxConsole(Test): >> > self.vm.launch() >> > console_pattern = 'Kernel command line: %s' % kernel_command_line >> > self.wait_for_console_pattern(console_pattern) >> > + >> > + def test_riscv64_virt(self): >> > + """ >> > + :avocado: tags=arch:riscv64 >> > + :avocado: tags=machine:virt >> > + """ >> > + deb_url = ('https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/' >> > + '20190424T171759Z/pool/main/b/binutils/' >> > + 'binutils-riscv64-linux-gnu_2.32-8_amd64.deb') >> > + deb_hash = ('7fe376fd4452696c03acd508d6d613ca553ea15e') >> > + deb_path = self.fetch_asset(deb_url, asset_hash=deb_hash) >> > + objcopy_path = '/usr/bin/riscv64-linux-gnu-objcopy' >> > + objcopy_path = self.extract_from_deb(deb_path, objcopy_path) >> > + libbfd_path = '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd-2.32-riscv64.so' >> > + libbfd_path = self.extract_from_deb(deb_path, libbfd_path) >> > + process.run('ls -al %s' % (objcopy_path)) >> >> Why do we need objcopy? Won't this not work on non x86 architectures? >> >> > + >> > + deb_url = ('https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/' >> > + '20190708T032337Z/pool/main/o/opensbi/' >> > + 'opensbi_0.4-1_all.deb') >> > + deb_hash = ('2319dcd702958291d323acf5649fd98a11d90112') >> > + deb_path = self.fetch_asset(deb_url, asset_hash=deb_hash) >> > + opensbi_path = ('/usr/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/opensbi/' >> > + 'qemu/virt/fw_jump.elf') >> > + opensbi_path = self.extract_from_deb(deb_path, opensbi_path) >> > + >> > + deb_url = ('https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian-ports/' >> > + '20190319T205124Z/pool-riscv64/main/l/linux/' >> > + 'linux-image-5.0.0-trunk-riscv64_5.0.2-1~exp1_riscv64.deb') >> > + deb_hash = ('90155ed4b36673cbf7746a37cf3159c8f0b2857a') >> > + deb_path = self.fetch_asset(deb_url, asset_hash=deb_hash) >> > + kernel_path = '/boot/vmlinux-5.0.0-trunk-riscv64' >> >> I thought we were swapping to using an Image file? >> >> Alistair >> > > For objcopy, > Philippe had the same question in PATCH v2 thread. Debian linux-kernel package only has vmlinux and riscv vmlinux ELF header doesn't contain the correct physical loading address 0x8020_0000. > What I think is to extract the Image from vmlinux by objcopy. This is what kernel do when generating arch/riscv/boot/Image. That is a real pain. I've never used Debian on RISC-V but that seems strange that they don't build Image files. I think you should use a Fedora kernel instead then. > > For swapping to using an image file, > I think what you talk about is we have included opensbi.bin into qemu master ? That has already happened, but you don't need it included. Alistair > The reason is the test use -initrd and -append to pass rootfs and kernel command line option and the two options requires using of -kernel option. > But -kernel option can't load the opensbi.bin to expected address. > > chihmin > >> >> > + kernel_path = self.extract_from_deb(deb_path, kernel_path) >> > + kimage_path = self.workdir + "/Image" >> > + env = os.environ >> > + env['LD_LIBRARY_PATH'] = ('%s:' % (os.path.dirname(libbfd_path)) + >> > + env.get('LD_LIBRARY_PATH', '')) >> > + process.run(('%s -O binary -O binary -R' >> > + '.note -R .note.gnu.build-id -R .comment -S %s %s') % >> > + (objcopy_path, kernel_path, kimage_path)) >> > + >> > + initrd_url = ('https://github.com/groeck/linux-build-test/raw/' >> > + '8584a59ed9e5eb5ee7ca91f6d74bbb06619205b8/rootfs/' >> > + 'riscv64/rootfs.cpio.gz') >> > + initrd_hash = 'f4867d263754961b6f626cdcdc0cb334c47e3b49' >> > + initrd_path = self.fetch_asset(initrd_url, asset_hash=initrd_hash) >> > + >> > + self.vm.set_machine('virt') >> > + self.vm.set_console() >> > + kernel_command_line = (self.KERNEL_COMMON_COMMAND_LINE >> > + + 'console=ttyS0 noreboot') >> > + self.vm.add_args('-bios', "none", >> > + '-kernel', opensbi_path, >> > + '-device', 'loader,file=%s,addr=0x80200000' % (kimage_path), >> > + '-initrd', initrd_path, >> > + '-append', kernel_command_line, >> > + '-no-reboot') >> > + >> > + self.vm.launch() >> > + self.wait_for_console_pattern('Boot successful.') >> > + >> > + self.exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern('cat /proc/cpuinfo', >> > + 'isa') >> > + self.exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern('uname -a', >> > + 'SMP Debian') >> > + self.exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern('reboot', >> > + 'reboot: Restarting system') >> > -- >> > 2.7.4 >> > >> >
diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml index caf0a1f..7ba9952 100644 --- a/.travis.yml +++ b/.travis.yml @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ matrix: # Acceptance (Functional) tests - env: - - CONFIG="--python=/usr/bin/python3 --target-list=x86_64-softmmu,mips-softmmu,mips64el-softmmu,aarch64-softmmu,arm-softmmu,s390x-softmmu,alpha-softmmu" + - CONFIG="--python=/usr/bin/python3 --target-list=x86_64-softmmu,mips-softmmu,mips64el-softmmu,aarch64-softmmu,arm-softmmu,s390x-softmmu,alpha-softmmu,riscv64-softmmu" - TEST_CMD="make check-acceptance" after_failure: - cat tests/results/latest/job.log diff --git a/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py b/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py index 3215950..b0569b9 100644 --- a/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py +++ b/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py @@ -354,3 +354,70 @@ class BootLinuxConsole(Test): self.vm.launch() console_pattern = 'Kernel command line: %s' % kernel_command_line self.wait_for_console_pattern(console_pattern) + + def test_riscv64_virt(self): + """ + :avocado: tags=arch:riscv64 + :avocado: tags=machine:virt + """ + deb_url = ('https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/' + '20190424T171759Z/pool/main/b/binutils/' + 'binutils-riscv64-linux-gnu_2.32-8_amd64.deb') + deb_hash = ('7fe376fd4452696c03acd508d6d613ca553ea15e') + deb_path = self.fetch_asset(deb_url, asset_hash=deb_hash) + objcopy_path = '/usr/bin/riscv64-linux-gnu-objcopy' + objcopy_path = self.extract_from_deb(deb_path, objcopy_path) + libbfd_path = '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd-2.32-riscv64.so' + libbfd_path = self.extract_from_deb(deb_path, libbfd_path) + process.run('ls -al %s' % (objcopy_path)) + + deb_url = ('https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/' + '20190708T032337Z/pool/main/o/opensbi/' + 'opensbi_0.4-1_all.deb') + deb_hash = ('2319dcd702958291d323acf5649fd98a11d90112') + deb_path = self.fetch_asset(deb_url, asset_hash=deb_hash) + opensbi_path = ('/usr/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/opensbi/' + 'qemu/virt/fw_jump.elf') + opensbi_path = self.extract_from_deb(deb_path, opensbi_path) + + deb_url = ('https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian-ports/' + '20190319T205124Z/pool-riscv64/main/l/linux/' + 'linux-image-5.0.0-trunk-riscv64_5.0.2-1~exp1_riscv64.deb') + deb_hash = ('90155ed4b36673cbf7746a37cf3159c8f0b2857a') + deb_path = self.fetch_asset(deb_url, asset_hash=deb_hash) + kernel_path = '/boot/vmlinux-5.0.0-trunk-riscv64' + kernel_path = self.extract_from_deb(deb_path, kernel_path) + kimage_path = self.workdir + "/Image" + env = os.environ + env['LD_LIBRARY_PATH'] = ('%s:' % (os.path.dirname(libbfd_path)) + + env.get('LD_LIBRARY_PATH', '')) + process.run(('%s -O binary -O binary -R' + '.note -R .note.gnu.build-id -R .comment -S %s %s') % + (objcopy_path, kernel_path, kimage_path)) + + initrd_url = ('https://github.com/groeck/linux-build-test/raw/' + '8584a59ed9e5eb5ee7ca91f6d74bbb06619205b8/rootfs/' + 'riscv64/rootfs.cpio.gz') + initrd_hash = 'f4867d263754961b6f626cdcdc0cb334c47e3b49' + initrd_path = self.fetch_asset(initrd_url, asset_hash=initrd_hash) + + self.vm.set_machine('virt') + self.vm.set_console() + kernel_command_line = (self.KERNEL_COMMON_COMMAND_LINE + + 'console=ttyS0 noreboot') + self.vm.add_args('-bios', "none", + '-kernel', opensbi_path, + '-device', 'loader,file=%s,addr=0x80200000' % (kimage_path), + '-initrd', initrd_path, + '-append', kernel_command_line, + '-no-reboot') + + self.vm.launch() + self.wait_for_console_pattern('Boot successful.') + + self.exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern('cat /proc/cpuinfo', + 'isa') + self.exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern('uname -a', + 'SMP Debian') + self.exec_command_and_wait_for_pattern('reboot', + 'reboot: Restarting system')
Similar to the mips + malta test, it boots a Linux kernel on a virt board and verify the serial is working. Also, it relies on the serial device set by the machine itself. If riscv64 is a target being built, "make check-acceptance" will automatically include this test by the use of the "arch:riscv64" tags. Alternatively, this test can be run using: $ avocado run -t arch:riscv64 tests/acceptance packages debian official binutils-riscv64-linux-gnu_2.32-8 opensbi_0.4-1_all linux-image-5.0.0-trunk-riscv64 5.0.2-1~exp1 third-party https://github.com/groeck/linux-build-test/rootfs/riscv64/rootfs.cpio.gz (the repo is also used in mips target acceptance) Signed-off-by: Chih-Min Chao <chihmin.chao@sifive.com> --- .travis.yml | 2 +- tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)