Message ID | 20180216172910.8549-3-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 06:29:07PM +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > diff --git a/docs/interop/vhost-user.txt b/docs/interop/vhost-user.txt > index 9fcf48d611..daa452bd36 100644 > --- a/docs/interop/vhost-user.txt > +++ b/docs/interop/vhost-user.txt > @@ -368,6 +368,7 @@ Protocol features > #define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_MTU 4 > #define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_SLAVE_REQ 5 > #define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_CROSS_ENDIAN 6 > +#define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_VIRTIO_STATUS 7 > > Master message types > -------------------- > @@ -663,6 +664,19 @@ Master message types > field, and slaves MUST NOT accept SET_CONFIG for read-only > configuration space fields unless the live migration bit is set. > > +* VHOST_USER_SET_VIRTIO_STATUS > + > + Id: 26 > + Equivalent ioctl: N/A > + Master payload: u64 > + Slave payload: N/A > + > + Sent by the vhost-user master to notify of virtio device status change. > + The payload is a u64 representing the virtio device status as defined in > + the virtio specification. > + The request should be sent only when VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_VIRTIO_STATUS > + protocol feature has been negotiated. > + > Slave message types > ------------------- > So for now backend was only activated after DRIVER_OK. Does this message mean that we must send updates such as _DRIVER as well? Further, this is kind of one-way, but there are several cases where device modifies the status. One is NEEDS_RESET. Another is clearing of FEATURES_OK.
On 02/27/2018 04:01 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 06:29:07PM +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote: >> diff --git a/docs/interop/vhost-user.txt b/docs/interop/vhost-user.txt >> index 9fcf48d611..daa452bd36 100644 >> --- a/docs/interop/vhost-user.txt >> +++ b/docs/interop/vhost-user.txt >> @@ -368,6 +368,7 @@ Protocol features >> #define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_MTU 4 >> #define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_SLAVE_REQ 5 >> #define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_CROSS_ENDIAN 6 >> +#define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_VIRTIO_STATUS 7 >> >> Master message types >> -------------------- >> @@ -663,6 +664,19 @@ Master message types >> field, and slaves MUST NOT accept SET_CONFIG for read-only >> configuration space fields unless the live migration bit is set. >> >> +* VHOST_USER_SET_VIRTIO_STATUS >> + >> + Id: 26 >> + Equivalent ioctl: N/A >> + Master payload: u64 >> + Slave payload: N/A >> + >> + Sent by the vhost-user master to notify of virtio device status change. >> + The payload is a u64 representing the virtio device status as defined in >> + the virtio specification. >> + The request should be sent only when VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_VIRTIO_STATUS >> + protocol feature has been negotiated. >> + >> Slave message types >> ------------------- >> > > So for now backend was only activated after DRIVER_OK. Does this message > mean that we must send updates such as _DRIVER as well? Yes, even if I don't see a use for _ACKNOWLEDGE and _DRIVER today. > Further, this is kind of one-way, but there are several cases where device > modifies the status. One is NEEDS_RESET. Another is clearing > of FEATURES_OK. Do you mean we should also notify the backend in case of NEEDS_RESET, or clearing of FEATURES_OK? Or you mean we should provide a way for the backend to update the device status, e.g. by having a slave-initiated VHOST_USER_SET_VIRTIO_STATUS request? Thanks, Maxime
diff --git a/docs/interop/vhost-user.txt b/docs/interop/vhost-user.txt index 9fcf48d611..daa452bd36 100644 --- a/docs/interop/vhost-user.txt +++ b/docs/interop/vhost-user.txt @@ -368,6 +368,7 @@ Protocol features #define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_MTU 4 #define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_SLAVE_REQ 5 #define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_CROSS_ENDIAN 6 +#define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_VIRTIO_STATUS 7 Master message types -------------------- @@ -663,6 +664,19 @@ Master message types field, and slaves MUST NOT accept SET_CONFIG for read-only configuration space fields unless the live migration bit is set. +* VHOST_USER_SET_VIRTIO_STATUS + + Id: 26 + Equivalent ioctl: N/A + Master payload: u64 + Slave payload: N/A + + Sent by the vhost-user master to notify of virtio device status change. + The payload is a u64 representing the virtio device status as defined in + the virtio specification. + The request should be sent only when VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_VIRTIO_STATUS + protocol feature has been negotiated. + Slave message types ------------------- diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c index 6eb97980ad..519646799b 100644 --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ enum VhostUserProtocolFeature { VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_NET_MTU = 4, VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_SLAVE_REQ = 5, VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_CROSS_ENDIAN = 6, + VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_VIRTIO_STATUS = 7, VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_MAX }; @@ -72,6 +73,7 @@ typedef enum VhostUserRequest { VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_ENDIAN = 23, VHOST_USER_GET_CONFIG = 24, VHOST_USER_SET_CONFIG = 25, + VHOST_USER_SET_VIRTIO_STATUS = 26, VHOST_USER_MAX } VhostUserRequest; @@ -1054,6 +1056,38 @@ static int vhost_user_set_config(struct vhost_dev *dev, const uint8_t *data, return 0; } +static int vhost_user_set_virtio_status(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint8_t status) +{ + bool reply_supported = virtio_has_feature(dev->protocol_features, + VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK); + + VhostUserMsg msg = { + .hdr.request = VHOST_USER_SET_VIRTIO_STATUS, + .hdr.flags = VHOST_USER_VERSION, + .hdr.size = sizeof(msg.payload.u64), + .payload.u64 = status, + }; + + if (!virtio_has_feature(dev->protocol_features, + VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_VIRTIO_STATUS)) { + return 0; + } + + if (reply_supported) { + msg.hdr.flags |= VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK; + } + + if (vhost_user_write(dev, &msg, NULL, 0) < 0) { + return -1; + } + + if (reply_supported) { + return process_message_reply(dev, &msg); + } + + return 0; +} + const VhostOps user_ops = { .backend_type = VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_USER, .vhost_backend_init = vhost_user_init, @@ -1082,4 +1116,5 @@ const VhostOps user_ops = { .vhost_send_device_iotlb_msg = vhost_user_send_device_iotlb_msg, .vhost_get_config = vhost_user_get_config, .vhost_set_config = vhost_user_set_config, + .vhost_set_virtio_status = vhost_user_set_virtio_status, };
This patch implements the .vhost_set_virtio_status() backend callback for user backend by intooducing a new vhost-user VHOST_USER_SET_VIRTIO_STATUS request. Suggested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> --- docs/interop/vhost-user.txt | 14 ++++++++++++++ hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+)