From patchwork Fri Jun 1 06:28:41 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Fam Zheng X-Patchwork-Id: 10442513 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2545601D3 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 06:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14D628EC5 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 06:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id A3DD928F82; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 06:37:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2775428EC5 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 06:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47678 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fOdgJ-00036J-0P for patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2018 02:36:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47163) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fOdZ9-0006MI-AA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2018 02:29:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fOdZ8-0005Jr-29 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2018 02:29:35 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:38070 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fOdZ3-0005DN-Cr; Fri, 01 Jun 2018 02:29:29 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F24CB7C6C4; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 06:29:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lemon.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-12-62.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.62]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A067D1C66A; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 06:29:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Fam Zheng To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 14:28:41 +0800 Message-Id: <20180601062849.28641-4-famz@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20180601062849.28641-1-famz@redhat.com> References: <20180601062849.28641-1-famz@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.2]); Fri, 01 Jun 2018 06:29:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.2]); Fri, 01 Jun 2018 06:29:29 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.5' DOMAIN:'int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'famz@redhat.com' RCPT:'' X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 66.187.233.73 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 03/11] raw: Check byte range uniformly X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , Fam Zheng , Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Peter Lieven , =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Max Reitz , Ronnie Sahlberg , Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?q?Alex=20Benn=C3=A9e?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP We don't verify the request range against s->size in the I/O callbacks except for raw_co_pwritev. This is inconsistent (especially for raw_co_pwrite_zeroes and raw_co_pdiscard), so fix them, in the meanwhile make the helper reusable by the coming new callbacks. Note that in most cases the block layer already verifies the request byte range against our reported image length, before invoking the driver callbacks. The exception is during image creating, after blk_set_allow_write_beyond_eof(blk, true) is called. But in that case, the requests are not directly from the user or guest. So there is no visible behavior change in adding the check code. The int64_t -> uint64_t inconsistency, as shown by the type casting, is pre-existing due to the interface. Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi Reviewed-by: Eric Blake Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng --- block/raw-format.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/raw-format.c b/block/raw-format.c index fe33693a2d..b69a0674b3 100644 --- a/block/raw-format.c +++ b/block/raw-format.c @@ -167,16 +167,37 @@ static void raw_reopen_abort(BDRVReopenState *state) state->opaque = NULL; } +/* Check and adjust the offset, against 'offset' and 'size' options. */ +static inline int raw_adjust_offset(BlockDriverState *bs, uint64_t *offset, + uint64_t bytes, bool is_write) +{ + BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque; + + if (s->has_size && (*offset > s->size || bytes > (s->size - *offset))) { + /* There's not enough space for the write, or the read request is + * out-of-range. Don't read/write anything to prevent leaking out of + * the size specified in options. */ + return is_write ? -ENOSPC : -EINVAL;; + } + + if (*offset > INT64_MAX - s->offset) { + return -EINVAL; + } + *offset += s->offset; + + return 0; +} + static int coroutine_fn raw_co_preadv(BlockDriverState *bs, uint64_t offset, uint64_t bytes, QEMUIOVector *qiov, int flags) { - BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque; + int ret; - if (offset > UINT64_MAX - s->offset) { - return -EINVAL; + ret = raw_adjust_offset(bs, &offset, bytes, false); + if (ret) { + return ret; } - offset += s->offset; BLKDBG_EVENT(bs->file, BLKDBG_READ_AIO); return bdrv_co_preadv(bs->file, offset, bytes, qiov, flags); @@ -186,23 +207,11 @@ static int coroutine_fn raw_co_pwritev(BlockDriverState *bs, uint64_t offset, uint64_t bytes, QEMUIOVector *qiov, int flags) { - BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque; void *buf = NULL; BlockDriver *drv; QEMUIOVector local_qiov; int ret; - if (s->has_size && (offset > s->size || bytes > (s->size - offset))) { - /* There's not enough space for the data. Don't write anything and just - * fail to prevent leaking out of the size specified in options. */ - return -ENOSPC; - } - - if (offset > UINT64_MAX - s->offset) { - ret = -EINVAL; - goto fail; - } - if (bs->probed && offset < BLOCK_PROBE_BUF_SIZE && bytes) { /* Handling partial writes would be a pain - so we just * require that guests have 512-byte request alignment if @@ -237,7 +246,10 @@ static int coroutine_fn raw_co_pwritev(BlockDriverState *bs, uint64_t offset, qiov = &local_qiov; } - offset += s->offset; + ret = raw_adjust_offset(bs, &offset, bytes, true); + if (ret) { + goto fail; + } BLKDBG_EVENT(bs->file, BLKDBG_WRITE_AIO); ret = bdrv_co_pwritev(bs->file, offset, bytes, qiov, flags); @@ -267,22 +279,24 @@ static int coroutine_fn raw_co_pwrite_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset, int bytes, BdrvRequestFlags flags) { - BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque; - if (offset > UINT64_MAX - s->offset) { - return -EINVAL; + int ret; + + ret = raw_adjust_offset(bs, (uint64_t *)&offset, bytes, true); + if (ret) { + return ret; } - offset += s->offset; return bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes(bs->file, offset, bytes, flags); } static int coroutine_fn raw_co_pdiscard(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset, int bytes) { - BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque; - if (offset > UINT64_MAX - s->offset) { - return -EINVAL; + int ret; + + ret = raw_adjust_offset(bs, (uint64_t *)&offset, bytes, true); + if (ret) { + return ret; } - offset += s->offset; return bdrv_co_pdiscard(bs->file->bs, offset, bytes); }