From patchwork Tue Aug 21 00:58:41 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Fam Zheng X-Patchwork-Id: 10570905 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF5414E1 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 01:09:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900E229E83 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 01:09:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 8467329E85; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 01:09:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [208.118.235.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F16ED29E83 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 01:09:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50129 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1frvAu-0004M7-8e for patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 21:09:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34190) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1frv76-0001Ig-PK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 21:05:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1frv0b-0000qz-8t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 20:58:58 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:43686 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1frv0a-0000pM-1M; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 20:58:56 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC263402316D; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lemon.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-12-57.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.57]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F701C737; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:58:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Fam Zheng To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 08:58:41 +0800 Message-Id: <20180821005843.5146-2-famz@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20180821005843.5146-1-famz@redhat.com> References: <20180821005843.5146-1-famz@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.6]); Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:58:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.6]); Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:58:55 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.5' DOMAIN:'int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'famz@redhat.com' RCPT:'' X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 66.187.233.73 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/3] file-posix: Skip effectiveless OFD lock operations X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Max Reitz Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP If we know we've already locked the bytes, don't do it again; similarly don't unlock a byte if we haven't locked it. This doesn't change the behavior, but fixes a corner case explained below. Libvirt had an error handling bug that an image can get its (ownership, file mode, SELinux) permissions changed (RHBZ 1584982) by mistake behind QEMU. Specifically, an image in use by Libvirt VM has: $ ls -lhZ b.img -rw-r--r--. qemu qemu system_u:object_r:svirt_image_t:s0:c600,c690 b.img Trying to attach it a second time won't work because of image locking. And after the error, it becomes: $ ls -lhZ b.img -rw-r--r--. root root system_u:object_r:virt_image_t:s0 b.img Then, we won't be able to do OFD lock operations with the existing fd. In other words, the code such as in blk_detach_dev: blk_set_perm(blk, 0, BLK_PERM_ALL, &error_abort); can abort() QEMU, out of environmental changes. This patch is an easy fix to this and the change is regardlessly reasonable, so do it. Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng Reviewed-by: Max Reitz --- v3: Don't misuse s->perm and s->shared_perm. v2: For s == NULL, unlock all bits. [Kevin] --- block/file-posix.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/file-posix.c b/block/file-posix.c index fe83cbf0eb..f062e477e9 100644 --- a/block/file-posix.c +++ b/block/file-posix.c @@ -152,6 +152,11 @@ typedef struct BDRVRawState { uint64_t perm; uint64_t shared_perm; + /* The perms bits whose corresponding bytes are already locked in + * s->lock_fd. */ + uint64_t locked_perm; + uint64_t locked_shared_perm; + #ifdef CONFIG_XFS bool is_xfs:1; #endif @@ -680,43 +685,72 @@ typedef enum { * file; if @unlock == true, also unlock the unneeded bytes. * @shared_perm_lock_bits is the mask of all permissions that are NOT shared. */ -static int raw_apply_lock_bytes(int fd, +static int raw_apply_lock_bytes(BDRVRawState *s, int fd, uint64_t perm_lock_bits, uint64_t shared_perm_lock_bits, bool unlock, Error **errp) { int ret; int i; + uint64_t locked_perm, locked_shared_perm; + + if (s) { + locked_perm = s->locked_perm; + locked_shared_perm = s->locked_shared_perm; + } else { + /* + * We don't have the previous bits, just lock/unlock for each of the + * requested bits. + */ + if (unlock) { + locked_perm = BLK_PERM_ALL; + locked_shared_perm = BLK_PERM_ALL; + } else { + locked_perm = 0; + locked_shared_perm = 0; + } + } PERM_FOREACH(i) { int off = RAW_LOCK_PERM_BASE + i; - if (perm_lock_bits & (1ULL << i)) { + uint64_t bit = (1ULL << i); + if ((perm_lock_bits & bit) && !(locked_perm & bit)) { ret = qemu_lock_fd(fd, off, 1, false); if (ret) { error_setg(errp, "Failed to lock byte %d", off); return ret; + } else if (s) { + s->locked_perm |= bit; } - } else if (unlock) { + } else if (unlock && (locked_perm & bit) && !(perm_lock_bits & bit)) { ret = qemu_unlock_fd(fd, off, 1); if (ret) { error_setg(errp, "Failed to unlock byte %d", off); return ret; + } else if (s) { + s->locked_perm &= ~bit; } } } PERM_FOREACH(i) { int off = RAW_LOCK_SHARED_BASE + i; - if (shared_perm_lock_bits & (1ULL << i)) { + uint64_t bit = (1ULL << i); + if ((shared_perm_lock_bits & bit) && !(locked_shared_perm & bit)) { ret = qemu_lock_fd(fd, off, 1, false); if (ret) { error_setg(errp, "Failed to lock byte %d", off); return ret; + } else if (s) { + s->locked_shared_perm |= bit; } - } else if (unlock) { + } else if (unlock && (locked_shared_perm & bit) && + !(shared_perm_lock_bits & bit)) { ret = qemu_unlock_fd(fd, off, 1); if (ret) { error_setg(errp, "Failed to unlock byte %d", off); return ret; + } else if (s) { + s->locked_shared_perm &= ~bit; } } } @@ -788,7 +822,7 @@ static int raw_handle_perm_lock(BlockDriverState *bs, switch (op) { case RAW_PL_PREPARE: - ret = raw_apply_lock_bytes(s->lock_fd, s->perm | new_perm, + ret = raw_apply_lock_bytes(s, s->lock_fd, s->perm | new_perm, ~s->shared_perm | ~new_shared, false, errp); if (!ret) { @@ -800,7 +834,7 @@ static int raw_handle_perm_lock(BlockDriverState *bs, op = RAW_PL_ABORT; /* fall through to unlock bytes. */ case RAW_PL_ABORT: - raw_apply_lock_bytes(s->lock_fd, s->perm, ~s->shared_perm, + raw_apply_lock_bytes(s, s->lock_fd, s->perm, ~s->shared_perm, true, &local_err); if (local_err) { /* Theoretically the above call only unlocks bytes and it cannot @@ -810,7 +844,7 @@ static int raw_handle_perm_lock(BlockDriverState *bs, } break; case RAW_PL_COMMIT: - raw_apply_lock_bytes(s->lock_fd, new_perm, ~new_shared, + raw_apply_lock_bytes(s, s->lock_fd, new_perm, ~new_shared, true, &local_err); if (local_err) { /* Theoretically the above call only unlocks bytes and it cannot @@ -2209,7 +2243,7 @@ raw_co_create(BlockdevCreateOptions *options, Error **errp) shared = BLK_PERM_ALL & ~BLK_PERM_RESIZE; /* Step one: Take locks */ - result = raw_apply_lock_bytes(fd, perm, ~shared, false, errp); + result = raw_apply_lock_bytes(NULL, fd, perm, ~shared, false, errp); if (result < 0) { goto out_close; } @@ -2250,7 +2284,7 @@ raw_co_create(BlockdevCreateOptions *options, Error **errp) } out_unlock: - raw_apply_lock_bytes(fd, 0, 0, true, &local_err); + raw_apply_lock_bytes(NULL, fd, 0, 0, true, &local_err); if (local_err) { /* The above call should not fail, and if it does, that does * not mean the whole creation operation has failed. So