Message ID | 20200206183219.3756-3-linux@roeck-us.net (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2,1/4] m25p80: Convert to support tracing | expand |
On 2/6/20 7:32 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Whenever an unsupported command is encountered, the current code > interprets each transferred byte as new command. Most of the time, those > 'commands' are interpreted as new unknown commands. However, in rare > cases, it may be that for example address or length information > passed with the original command is by itself a valid command. > If that happens, the state machine may get completely confused and, > worst case, start writing data into the flash or even erase it. > > To avoid the problem, transition into STATE_READING_DATA and keep > sending a value of 0 until the chip is deselected after encountering > an unsupported command. > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > --- > v2: Split patch into two parts; improved description. > > hw/block/m25p80.c | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/hw/block/m25p80.c b/hw/block/m25p80.c > index 53bf63856f..8227088441 100644 > --- a/hw/block/m25p80.c > +++ b/hw/block/m25p80.c > @@ -1161,6 +1161,11 @@ static void decode_new_cmd(Flash *s, uint32_t value) > s->quad_enable = false; > break; > default: > + s->pos = 0; > + s->len = 1; > + s->state = STATE_READING_DATA; > + s->data_read_loop = true; > + s->data[0] = 0; Maybe self-explicit using: s->data[0] = NOP; Matter of taste probably, but I find this order easier to review: s->state = STATE_READING_DATA; s->data_read_loop = true; s->pos = 0; s->data[0] = NOP; s->len = 1; Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> > qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "M25P80: Unknown cmd %x\n", value); > break; > } >
On 2/6/20 7:32 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Whenever an unsupported command is encountered, the current code > interprets each transferred byte as new command. Most of the time, those > 'commands' are interpreted as new unknown commands. However, in rare > cases, it may be that for example address or length information > passed with the original command is by itself a valid command. > If that happens, the state machine may get completely confused and, > worst case, start writing data into the flash or even erase it. > > To avoid the problem, transition into STATE_READING_DATA and keep > sending a value of 0 until the chip is deselected after encountering > an unsupported command. > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> > --- > v2: Split patch into two parts; improved description. > > hw/block/m25p80.c | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/hw/block/m25p80.c b/hw/block/m25p80.c > index 53bf63856f..8227088441 100644 > --- a/hw/block/m25p80.c > +++ b/hw/block/m25p80.c > @@ -1161,6 +1161,11 @@ static void decode_new_cmd(Flash *s, uint32_t value) > s->quad_enable = false; > break; > default: > + s->pos = 0; > + s->len = 1; > + s->state = STATE_READING_DATA; > + s->data_read_loop = true; > + s->data[0] = 0; > qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "M25P80: Unknown cmd %x\n", value); > break; > } >
diff --git a/hw/block/m25p80.c b/hw/block/m25p80.c index 53bf63856f..8227088441 100644 --- a/hw/block/m25p80.c +++ b/hw/block/m25p80.c @@ -1161,6 +1161,11 @@ static void decode_new_cmd(Flash *s, uint32_t value) s->quad_enable = false; break; default: + s->pos = 0; + s->len = 1; + s->state = STATE_READING_DATA; + s->data_read_loop = true; + s->data[0] = 0; qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "M25P80: Unknown cmd %x\n", value); break; }
Whenever an unsupported command is encountered, the current code interprets each transferred byte as new command. Most of the time, those 'commands' are interpreted as new unknown commands. However, in rare cases, it may be that for example address or length information passed with the original command is by itself a valid command. If that happens, the state machine may get completely confused and, worst case, start writing data into the flash or even erase it. To avoid the problem, transition into STATE_READING_DATA and keep sending a value of 0 until the chip is deselected after encountering an unsupported command. Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> --- v2: Split patch into two parts; improved description. hw/block/m25p80.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)