@@ -28,6 +28,10 @@
void openrisc_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
{
+ bool bql = !qemu_mutex_iothread_locked();
+ if (bql) {
+ qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
+ }
#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
OpenRISCCPU *cpu = OPENRISC_CPU(cs);
CPUOpenRISCState *env = &cpu->env;
@@ -99,6 +103,9 @@ void openrisc_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
#endif
cs->exception_index = -1;
+ if (bql) {
+ qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
+ }
}
bool openrisc_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int interrupt_request)
@@ -106,6 +113,7 @@ bool openrisc_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int interrupt_request)
OpenRISCCPU *cpu = OPENRISC_CPU(cs);
CPUOpenRISCState *env = &cpu->env;
int idx = -1;
+ qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
if ((interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD) && (env->sr & SR_IEE)) {
idx = EXCP_INT;
@@ -116,7 +124,9 @@ bool openrisc_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int interrupt_request)
if (idx >= 0) {
cs->exception_index = idx;
openrisc_cpu_do_interrupt(cs);
+ qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
return true;
}
+ qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
return false;
}
This is part of a series of changes to remove the implied BQL from the common code of cpu_handle_interrupt and cpu_handle_exception. As part of removing the implied BQL from the common code, we are pushing the BQL holding down into the per-arch implementation functions of do_interrupt and cpu_exec_interrupt. The purpose of this set of changes is to set the groundwork so that an arch could move towards removing the BQL from the cpu_handle_interrupt/exception paths. This approach was suggested by Paolo Bonzini. For reference, here are two key posts in the discussion, explaining the reasoning/benefits of this approach. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-07/msg08731.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-08/msg00044.html Signed-off-by: Robert Foley <robert.foley@linaro.org> --- target/openrisc/interrupt.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)