@@ -48,6 +48,10 @@ void rx_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
CPURXState *env = &cpu->env;
int do_irq = cs->interrupt_request & INT_FLAGS;
uint32_t save_psw;
+ bool bql = !qemu_mutex_iothread_locked();
+ if (bql) {
+ qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
+ }
env->in_sleep = 0;
@@ -117,6 +121,9 @@ void rx_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
(vec & 0xff), expname);
}
env->regs[0] = env->isp;
+ if (bql) {
+ qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
+ }
}
bool rx_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int interrupt_request)
@@ -124,6 +131,7 @@ bool rx_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int interrupt_request)
RXCPU *cpu = RXCPU(cs);
CPURXState *env = &cpu->env;
int accept = 0;
+ qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
/* hardware interrupt (Normal) */
if ((interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD) &&
env->psw_i && (env->psw_ipl < env->req_ipl)) {
@@ -138,8 +146,10 @@ bool rx_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int interrupt_request)
}
if (accept) {
rx_cpu_do_interrupt(cs);
+ qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
return true;
}
+ qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
return false;
}
This is part of a series of changes to remove the implied BQL from the common code of cpu_handle_interrupt and cpu_handle_exception. As part of removing the implied BQL from the common code, we are pushing the BQL holding down into the per-arch implementation functions of do_interrupt and cpu_exec_interrupt. The purpose of this set of changes is to set the groundwork so that an arch could move towards removing the BQL from the cpu_handle_interrupt/exception paths. This approach was suggested by Paolo Bonzini. For reference, here are two key posts in the discussion, explaining the reasoning/benefits of this approach. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-07/msg08731.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-08/msg00044.html Signed-off-by: Robert Foley <robert.foley@linaro.org> --- target/rx/helper.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)