@@ -528,12 +528,17 @@ bool arm_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int interrupt_request)
{
CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(cs);
CPUARMState *env = cs->env_ptr;
- uint32_t cur_el = arm_current_el(env);
- bool secure = arm_is_secure(env);
- uint64_t hcr_el2 = arm_hcr_el2_eff(env);
+ uint32_t cur_el;
+ bool secure;
+ uint64_t hcr_el2;
uint32_t target_el;
uint32_t excp_idx;
+ qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
+ cur_el = arm_current_el(env);
+ secure = arm_is_secure(env);
+ hcr_el2 = arm_hcr_el2_eff(env);
+
/* The prioritization of interrupts is IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED. */
if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_FIQ) {
@@ -568,12 +573,14 @@ bool arm_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int interrupt_request)
goto found;
}
}
+ qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
return false;
found:
cs->exception_index = excp_idx;
env->exception.target_el = target_el;
cc->do_interrupt(cs);
+ qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
return true;
}
@@ -9759,7 +9759,13 @@ void arm_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
{
ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cs);
CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
- unsigned int new_el = env->exception.target_el;
+ unsigned int new_el;
+
+ bool bql = !qemu_mutex_iothread_locked();
+ if (bql) {
+ qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
+ }
+ new_el = env->exception.target_el;
assert(!arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M));
@@ -9776,6 +9782,9 @@ void arm_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
if (arm_is_psci_call(cpu, cs->exception_index)) {
arm_handle_psci_call(cpu);
qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_INT, "...handled as PSCI call\n");
+ if (bql) {
+ qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
+ }
return;
}
@@ -9787,6 +9796,9 @@ void arm_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
#ifdef CONFIG_TCG
if (cs->exception_index == EXCP_SEMIHOST) {
handle_semihosting(cs);
+ if (bql) {
+ qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
+ }
return;
}
#endif
@@ -9808,6 +9820,9 @@ void arm_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
if (!kvm_enabled()) {
cpu_interrupt_request_or(cs, CPU_INTERRUPT_EXITTB);
}
+ if (bql) {
+ qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
+ }
}
#endif /* !CONFIG_USER_ONLY */
This is part of a series of changes to remove the implied BQL from the common code of cpu_handle_interrupt and cpu_handle_exception. As part of removing the implied BQL from the common code, we are pushing the BQL holding down into the per-arch implementation functions of do_interrupt and cpu_exec_interrupt. The purpose of this set of changes is to set the groundwork so that an arch could move towards removing the BQL from the cpu_handle_interrupt/exception paths. This approach was suggested by Paolo Bonzini. For reference, here are two key posts in the discussion, explaining the reasoning/benefits of this approach. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-07/msg08731.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-08/msg00044.html Signed-off-by: Robert Foley <robert.foley@linaro.org> --- target/arm/cpu.c | 13 ++++++++++--- target/arm/helper.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)