@@ -152,6 +152,10 @@ void lm32_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
{
LM32CPU *cpu = LM32_CPU(cs);
CPULM32State *env = &cpu->env;
+ bool bql = !qemu_mutex_iothread_locked();
+ if (bql) {
+ qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
+ }
qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_INT,
"exception at pc=%x type=%x\n", env->pc, cs->exception_index);
@@ -196,18 +200,24 @@ void lm32_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
cs->exception_index);
break;
}
+ if (bql) {
+ qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
+ }
}
bool lm32_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int interrupt_request)
{
LM32CPU *cpu = LM32_CPU(cs);
CPULM32State *env = &cpu->env;
+ qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
if ((interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD) && (env->ie & IE_IE)) {
cs->exception_index = EXCP_IRQ;
lm32_cpu_do_interrupt(cs);
+ qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
return true;
}
+ qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
return false;
}
This is part of a series of changes to remove the implied BQL from the common code of cpu_handle_interrupt and cpu_handle_exception. As part of removing the implied BQL from the common code, we are pushing the BQL holding down into the per-arch implementation functions of do_interrupt and cpu_exec_interrupt. The purpose of this set of changes is to set the groundwork so that an arch could move towards removing the BQL from the cpu_handle_interrupt/exception paths. This approach was suggested by Paolo Bonzini. For reference, here are two key posts in the discussion, explaining the reasoning/benefits of this approach. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-07/msg08731.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-08/msg00044.html Signed-off-by: Robert Foley <robert.foley@linaro.org> --- target/lm32/helper.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)