Message ID | 20210422161130.652779-15-vkuznets@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | i386: KVM: expand Hyper-V features early | expand |
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 06:11:25PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > There is no need to use vCPU-specific kvm state in hyperv_enabled() check > and we need to do that when feature expansion happens early, before vCPU > specific KVM state is created. > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c index 5d08f3a39ef7..a42263b24fca 100644 --- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c +++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c @@ -715,8 +715,7 @@ unsigned long kvm_arch_vcpu_id(CPUState *cs) static bool hyperv_enabled(X86CPU *cpu) { - CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu); - return kvm_check_extension(cs->kvm_state, KVM_CAP_HYPERV) > 0 && + return kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_HYPERV) > 0 && ((cpu->hyperv_spinlock_attempts != HYPERV_SPINLOCK_NEVER_NOTIFY) || cpu->hyperv_features || cpu->hyperv_passthrough); }
There is no need to use vCPU-specific kvm state in hyperv_enabled() check and we need to do that when feature expansion happens early, before vCPU specific KVM state is created. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> --- target/i386/kvm/kvm.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)