Message ID | 20211207210425.150923-9-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | s390x/pci: zPCI interpretation support | expand |
On 07/12/2021 22.04, Matthew Rosato wrote: > Lack of MSI-X support is not an issue for interpreted passthrough > devices, so let's let these in. This will allow, for example, ISM > devices to be passed through -- but only when interpretation is > available and being used. > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> > --- > hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c > index 451bd32d92..503326210a 100644 > --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c > +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c > @@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@ static void s390_pcihost_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev, > pbdev->interp = false; > } > > - if (s390_pci_msix_init(pbdev)) { > + if (s390_pci_msix_init(pbdev) && !pbdev->interp) { > error_setg(errp, "MSI-X support is mandatory " > "in the S390 architecture"); > return; > Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
On 12/7/21 22:04, Matthew Rosato wrote: > Lack of MSI-X support is not an issue for interpreted passthrough > devices, so let's let these in. This will allow, for example, ISM > devices to be passed through -- but only when interpretation is > available and being used. > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> > --- > hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c > index 451bd32d92..503326210a 100644 > --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c > +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c > @@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@ static void s390_pcihost_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev, > pbdev->interp = false; > } > > - if (s390_pci_msix_init(pbdev)) { > + if (s390_pci_msix_init(pbdev) && !pbdev->interp) { > error_setg(errp, "MSI-X support is mandatory " > "in the S390 architecture"); > return; > Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c index 451bd32d92..503326210a 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c @@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@ static void s390_pcihost_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev, pbdev->interp = false; } - if (s390_pci_msix_init(pbdev)) { + if (s390_pci_msix_init(pbdev) && !pbdev->interp) { error_setg(errp, "MSI-X support is mandatory " "in the S390 architecture"); return;
Lack of MSI-X support is not an issue for interpreted passthrough devices, so let's let these in. This will allow, for example, ISM devices to be passed through -- but only when interpretation is available and being used. Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> --- hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)