| Message ID | 20220113144426.4036493-2-pl@kamp.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | fixes for bdrv_co_block_status | expand |
diff --git a/block/rbd.c b/block/rbd.c index def96292e0..20bb896c4a 100644 --- a/block/rbd.c +++ b/block/rbd.c @@ -1279,11 +1279,11 @@ static int qemu_rbd_diff_iterate_cb(uint64_t offs, size_t len, RBDDiffIterateReq *req = opaque; assert(req->offs + req->bytes <= offs); - /* - * we do not diff against a snapshot so we should never receive a callback - * for a hole. - */ - assert(exists); + + /* treat a hole like an unallocated area and bail out */ + if (!exists) { + return 0; + } if (!req->exists && offs > req->offs) { /*
the assumption that we can't hit a hole if we do not diff against a snapshot was wrong. We can see a hole in an image if we diff against base if there exists an older snapshot of the image and we have discarded blocks in the image where the snapshot has data. Fix this by simply handling a hole like an unallocated area. There are no callbacks for unallocated areas so just bail out if we hit a hole. Fixes: 0347a8fd4c3faaedf119be04c197804be40a384b Suggested-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de> --- block/rbd.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)