diff mbox series

[9/9] spapr: implement nested-hv capability for the virtual hypervisor

Message ID 20220215031642.1691873-10-npiggin@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series ppc: nested KVM HV for spapr virtual hypervisor | expand

Commit Message

Nicholas Piggin Feb. 15, 2022, 3:16 a.m. UTC
This implements the Nested KVM HV hcall API for spapr under TCG.

The L2 is switched in when the H_ENTER_NESTED hcall is made, and the
L1 is switched back in returned from the hcall when a HV exception
is sent to the vhyp. Register state is copied in and out according to
the nested KVM HV hcall API specification.

The hdecr timer is started when the L2 is switched in, and it provides
the HDEC / 0x980 return to L1.

The MMU re-uses the bare metal radix 2-level page table walker by
using the get_pate method to point the MMU to the nested partition
table entry. MMU faults due to partition scope errors raise HV
exceptions and accordingly are routed back to the L1.

The MMU does not tag translations for the L1 (direct) vs L2 (nested)
guests, so the TLB is flushed on any L1<->L2 transition (hcall entry
and exit).

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
 hw/ppc/spapr.c         |  32 +++-
 hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c    |  11 +-
 hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c   | 321 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/hw/ppc/spapr.h |  74 +++++++++-
 target/ppc/cpu.h       |   3 +
 5 files changed, 431 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Fabiano Rosas Feb. 15, 2022, 4:01 p.m. UTC | #1
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> writes:

> This implements the Nested KVM HV hcall API for spapr under TCG.
>
> The L2 is switched in when the H_ENTER_NESTED hcall is made, and the
> L1 is switched back in returned from the hcall when a HV exception
> is sent to the vhyp. Register state is copied in and out according to
> the nested KVM HV hcall API specification.
>
> The hdecr timer is started when the L2 is switched in, and it provides
> the HDEC / 0x980 return to L1.
>
> The MMU re-uses the bare metal radix 2-level page table walker by
> using the get_pate method to point the MMU to the nested partition
> table entry. MMU faults due to partition scope errors raise HV
> exceptions and accordingly are routed back to the L1.
>
> The MMU does not tag translations for the L1 (direct) vs L2 (nested)
> guests, so the TLB is flushed on any L1<->L2 transition (hcall entry
> and exit).
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Cédric Le Goater Feb. 15, 2022, 6:21 p.m. UTC | #2
On 2/15/22 04:16, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> This implements the Nested KVM HV hcall API for spapr under TCG.
> 
> The L2 is switched in when the H_ENTER_NESTED hcall is made, and the
> L1 is switched back in returned from the hcall when a HV exception
> is sent to the vhyp. Register state is copied in and out according to
> the nested KVM HV hcall API specification.
> 
> The hdecr timer is started when the L2 is switched in, and it provides
> the HDEC / 0x980 return to L1.
> 
> The MMU re-uses the bare metal radix 2-level page table walker by
> using the get_pate method to point the MMU to the nested partition
> table entry. MMU faults due to partition scope errors raise HV
> exceptions and accordingly are routed back to the L1.
> 
> The MMU does not tag translations for the L1 (direct) vs L2 (nested)
> guests, so the TLB is flushed on any L1<->L2 transition (hcall entry
> and exit).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> ---
>   hw/ppc/spapr.c         |  32 +++-
>   hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c    |  11 +-
>   hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c   | 321 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   include/hw/ppc/spapr.h |  74 +++++++++-
>   target/ppc/cpu.h       |   3 +
>   5 files changed, 431 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 3a5cf92c94..6988e3ec76 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -1314,11 +1314,32 @@ static bool spapr_get_pate(PPCVirtualHypervisor *vhyp, PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>   {
>       SpaprMachineState *spapr = SPAPR_MACHINE(vhyp);
>   
> -    assert(lpid == 0);
> +    if (!cpu->in_spapr_nested) {

Since 'in_spapr_nested' is a spapr CPU characteristic, I don't think
it belongs to PowerPCCPU. See the end of the patch, for a proposal.

btw, this helps the ordering of files :

[diff]
	orderFile = /path/to/qemu/scripts/git.orderfile

> +        assert(lpid == 0);
>   
> -    /* Copy PATE1:GR into PATE0:HR */
> -    entry->dw0 = spapr->patb_entry & PATE0_HR;
> -    entry->dw1 = spapr->patb_entry;
> +        /* Copy PATE1:GR into PATE0:HR */
> +        entry->dw0 = spapr->patb_entry & PATE0_HR;
> +        entry->dw1 = spapr->patb_entry;
> +
> +    } else {
> +        uint64_t patb, pats;
> +
> +        assert(lpid != 0);
> +
> +        patb = spapr->nested_ptcr & PTCR_PATB;
> +        pats = spapr->nested_ptcr & PTCR_PATS;
> +
> +        /* Calculate number of entries */
> +        pats = 1ull << (pats + 12 - 4);
> +        if (pats <= lpid) {
> +            return false;
> +        }
> +
> +        /* Grab entry */
> +        patb += 16 * lpid;
> +        entry->dw0 = ldq_phys(CPU(cpu)->as, patb);
> +        entry->dw1 = ldq_phys(CPU(cpu)->as, patb + 8);
> +    }
>   
>       return true;
>   }
> @@ -4472,7 +4493,7 @@ PowerPCCPU *spapr_find_cpu(int vcpu_id)
>   
>   static bool spapr_cpu_in_nested(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>   {
> -    return false;
> +    return cpu->in_spapr_nested;
>   }
>   
>   static void spapr_cpu_exec_enter(PPCVirtualHypervisor *vhyp, PowerPCCPU *cpu)
> @@ -4584,6 +4605,7 @@ static void spapr_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>       nc->nmi_monitor_handler = spapr_nmi;
>       smc->phb_placement = spapr_phb_placement;
>       vhc->cpu_in_nested = spapr_cpu_in_nested;
> +    vhc->deliver_hv_excp = spapr_exit_nested;
>       vhc->hypercall = emulate_spapr_hypercall;
>       vhc->hpt_mask = spapr_hpt_mask;
>       vhc->map_hptes = spapr_map_hptes;
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c
> index 5cc80776d0..4d8bb2ad2c 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c
> @@ -444,19 +444,22 @@ static void cap_nested_kvm_hv_apply(SpaprMachineState *spapr,
>   {
>       ERRP_GUARD();
>       PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(first_cpu);
> +    CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
>   
>       if (!val) {
>           /* capability disabled by default */
>           return;
>       }
>   
> -    if (tcg_enabled()) {
> -        error_setg(errp, "No Nested KVM-HV support in TCG");

I don't like using KVM-HV (which is KVM-over-PowerNV) when talking about
KVM-over-pseries. I think the platform name is important. Anyhow, this is
a more global discussion but we should talk about it someday because these
HV mode are becoming confusing ! We have PR also :)


> +    if (!(env->insns_flags2 & PPC2_ISA300)) {
> +        error_setg(errp, "Nested KVM-HV only supported on POWER9 and later");
>           error_append_hint(errp, "Try appending -machine cap-nested-hv=off\n");

return ?

> -    } else if (kvm_enabled()) {
> +    }
> +
> +    if (kvm_enabled()) {
>           if (!ppc_check_compat(cpu, CPU_POWERPC_LOGICAL_3_00, 0,
>                                 spapr->max_compat_pvr)) {
> -            error_setg(errp, "Nested KVM-HV only supported on POWER9");
> +            error_setg(errp, "Nested KVM-HV only supported on POWER9 and later");
>               error_append_hint(errp,
>                                 "Try appending -machine max-cpu-compat=power9\n");
>               return;
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> index 5dec056796..3129fae90d 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>   #include "qemu/error-report.h"
>   #include "exec/exec-all.h"
>   #include "helper_regs.h"
> +#include "hw/ppc/ppc.h"
>   #include "hw/ppc/spapr.h"
>   #include "hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h"
>   #include "mmu-hash64.h"
> @@ -1500,6 +1501,321 @@ static void hypercall_register_softmmu(void)
>   }
>   #endif
>   
> +/* TCG only */
> +#define PRTS_MASK      0x1f
> +
> +static target_ulong h_set_ptbl(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> +                               SpaprMachineState *spapr,
> +                               target_ulong opcode,
> +                               target_ulong *args)
> +{
> +    target_ulong ptcr = args[0];
> +
> +    if (!spapr_get_cap(spapr, SPAPR_CAP_NESTED_KVM_HV)) {
> +        return H_FUNCTION;
> +    }
> +
> +    if ((ptcr & PRTS_MASK) + 12 - 4 > 12) {
> +        return H_PARAMETER;
> +    }
> +
> +    spapr->nested_ptcr = ptcr; /* Save new partition table */
> +
> +    return H_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +static target_ulong h_tlb_invalidate(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> +                                     SpaprMachineState *spapr,
> +                                     target_ulong opcode,
> +                                     target_ulong *args)
> +{
> +    /*
> +     * The spapr virtual hypervisor nested HV implementation retains no L2
> +     * translation state except for TLB. And the TLB is always invalidated
> +     * across L1<->L2 transitions, so nothing is required here.
> +     */
> +
> +    return H_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +static target_ulong h_copy_tofrom_guest(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> +                                        SpaprMachineState *spapr,
> +                                        target_ulong opcode,
> +                                        target_ulong *args)
> +{
> +    /*
> +     * This HCALL is not required, L1 KVM will take a slow path and walk the
> +     * page tables manually to do the data copy.
> +     */
> +    return H_FUNCTION;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * When this handler returns, the environment is switched to the L2 guest
> + * and TCG begins running that. spapr_exit_nested() performs the switch from
> + * L2 back to L1 and returns from the H_ENTER_NESTED hcall.
> + */
> +static target_ulong h_enter_nested(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> +                                   SpaprMachineState *spapr,
> +                                   target_ulong opcode,
> +                                   target_ulong *args)
> +{
> +    PowerPCCPUClass *pcc = POWERPC_CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
> +    CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
> +    CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
> +    target_ulong hv_ptr = args[0];
> +    target_ulong regs_ptr = args[1];
> +    target_ulong hdec, now = cpu_ppc_load_tbl(env);
> +    target_ulong lpcr, lpcr_mask;
> +    struct kvmppc_hv_guest_state *hvstate;
> +    struct kvmppc_hv_guest_state hv_state;
> +    struct kvmppc_pt_regs *regs;
> +    hwaddr len;
> +    uint32_t cr;
> +    int i;
> +
> +    if (cpu->in_spapr_nested) {
> +        return H_FUNCTION;

That would be an L3 :)

> +    }
> +    if (spapr->nested_ptcr == 0) {
> +        return H_NOT_AVAILABLE;
> +    }
> +
> +    len = sizeof(*hvstate);
> +    hvstate = cpu_physical_memory_map(hv_ptr, &len, true);

When a CPU is available, I would prefer :

     hvstate = address_space_map(CPU(cpu)->as, hv_ptr, &len, true,
                               MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
     
like ppc_hash64_map_hptes() does. This is minor.

> +    if (!hvstate || len != sizeof(*hvstate)) {
> +        return H_PARAMETER;
> +    }
> +
> +    memcpy(&hv_state, hvstate, len);
> +
> +    cpu_physical_memory_unmap(hvstate, len, 0 /* read */, len /* access len */);

checkpatch will complain with the above comments.

> +
> +    /*
> +     * We accept versions 1 and 2. Version 2 fields are unused because TCG
> +     * does not implement DAWR*.
> +     */
> +    if (hv_state.version > HV_GUEST_STATE_VERSION) {
> +        return H_PARAMETER;
> +    }
> +
> +    cpu->nested_host_state = g_try_malloc(sizeof(CPUPPCState));

I think we could preallocate this buffer once we know nested are supported,
or if we keep it, it could be our 'in_spapr_nested' indicator.

> +    if (!cpu->nested_host_state) {
> +        return H_NO_MEM;
> +    }
> +
> +    memcpy(cpu->nested_host_state, env, sizeof(CPUPPCState));
> +
> +    len = sizeof(*regs);
> +    regs = cpu_physical_memory_map(regs_ptr, &len, true);
> +    if (!regs || len != sizeof(*regs)) {
> +        g_free(cpu->nested_host_state);
> +        return H_P2;
> +    }
> +
> +    len = sizeof(env->gpr);
> +    assert(len == sizeof(regs->gpr));
> +    memcpy(env->gpr, regs->gpr, len);
> +
> +    env->lr = regs->link;
> +    env->ctr = regs->ctr;
> +    cpu_write_xer(env, regs->xer);
> +
> +    cr = regs->ccr;
> +    for (i = 7; i >= 0; i--) {
> +        env->crf[i] = cr & 15;
> +        cr >>= 4;
> +    }
> +
> +    env->msr = regs->msr;
> +    env->nip = regs->nip;
> +
> +    cpu_physical_memory_unmap(regs, len, 0 /* read */, len /* access len */);
> +
> +    env->cfar = hv_state.cfar;
> +
> +    assert(env->spr[SPR_LPIDR] == 0);
> +    env->spr[SPR_LPIDR] = hv_state.lpid;
> +
> +    lpcr_mask = LPCR_DPFD | LPCR_ILE | LPCR_AIL | LPCR_LD | LPCR_MER;
> +    lpcr = (env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & ~lpcr_mask) | (hv_state.lpcr & lpcr_mask);
> +    lpcr |= LPCR_HR | LPCR_UPRT | LPCR_GTSE | LPCR_HVICE | LPCR_HDICE;
> +    lpcr &= ~LPCR_LPES0;
> +    env->spr[SPR_LPCR] = lpcr & pcc->lpcr_mask;
> +
> +    env->spr[SPR_PCR] = hv_state.pcr;
> +    /* hv_state.amor is not used */
> +    env->spr[SPR_DPDES] = hv_state.dpdes;
> +    env->spr[SPR_HFSCR] = hv_state.hfscr;
> +    hdec = hv_state.hdec_expiry - now;
> +    env->tb_env->tb_offset += hv_state.tb_offset;
> +    /* TCG does not implement DAWR*, CIABR, PURR, SPURR, IC, VTB, HEIR SPRs*/
> +    env->spr[SPR_SRR0] = hv_state.srr0;
> +    env->spr[SPR_SRR1] = hv_state.srr1;
> +    env->spr[SPR_SPRG0] = hv_state.sprg[0];
> +    env->spr[SPR_SPRG1] = hv_state.sprg[1];
> +    env->spr[SPR_SPRG2] = hv_state.sprg[2];
> +    env->spr[SPR_SPRG3] = hv_state.sprg[3];
> +    env->spr[SPR_BOOKS_PID] = hv_state.pidr;
> +    env->spr[SPR_PPR] = hv_state.ppr;
> +
> +    cpu_ppc_hdecr_init(env);
> +    cpu_ppc_store_hdecr(env, hdec);
> +
> +    /*
> +     * The hv_state.vcpu_token is not needed. It is used by the KVM
> +     * implementation to remember which L2 vCPU last ran on which physical
> +     * CPU so as to invalidate process scope translations if it is moved
> +     * between physical CPUs. For now TLBs are always flushed on L1<->L2
> +     * transitions so this is not a problem.
> +     *
> +     * Could validate that the same vcpu_token does not attempt to run on
> +     * different L1 vCPUs at the same time, but that would be a L1 KVM bug
> +     * and it's not obviously worth a new data structure to do it.
> +     */
> +
> +    cpu->in_spapr_nested = true;
> +
> +    hreg_compute_hflags(env);
> +    tlb_flush(cs);
> +    env->reserve_addr = -1; /* Reset the reservation */
> +
> +    /*
> +     * The spapr hcall helper sets env->gpr[3] to the return value, but at
> +     * this point the L1 is not returning from the hcall but rather we
> +     * start running the L2, so r3 must not be clobbered, so return env->gpr[3]
> +     * to leave it unchanged.
> +     */
> +    return env->gpr[3];
> +}
> +
> +void spapr_exit_nested(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int excp)
> +{
> +    CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
> +    CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
> +    target_ulong r3_return = env->excp_vectors[excp]; /* hcall return value */
> +    target_ulong hv_ptr = cpu->nested_host_state->gpr[4];
> +    target_ulong regs_ptr = cpu->nested_host_state->gpr[5];
> +    struct kvmppc_hv_guest_state *hvstate;
> +    struct kvmppc_pt_regs *regs;
> +    hwaddr len;
> +    int i;
> +
> +    assert(cpu->in_spapr_nested);
> +    cpu->in_spapr_nested = false;
> +
> +    cpu_ppc_hdecr_exit(env);
> +
> +    len = sizeof(*hvstate);
> +    hvstate = cpu_physical_memory_map(hv_ptr, &len, true);
> +    if (!hvstate || len != sizeof(*hvstate)) {
> +        r3_return = H_PARAMETER;
> +        goto out_restore_l1;
> +    }
> +
> +    env->tb_env->tb_offset -= hvstate->tb_offset;
> +
> +    hvstate->cfar = env->cfar;
> +    hvstate->lpcr = env->spr[SPR_LPCR];
> +    hvstate->pcr = env->spr[SPR_PCR];
> +    hvstate->dpdes = env->spr[SPR_DPDES];
> +    hvstate->hfscr = env->spr[SPR_HFSCR];
> +
> +    if (excp == POWERPC_EXCP_HDSI) {
> +        hvstate->hdar = env->spr[SPR_HDAR];
> +        hvstate->hdsisr = env->spr[SPR_HDSISR];
> +        hvstate->asdr = env->spr[SPR_ASDR];
> +    } else if (excp == POWERPC_EXCP_HISI) {
> +        hvstate->asdr = env->spr[SPR_ASDR];
> +    }
> +
> +    /* HEIR should be implemented for HV mode and saved here. */
> +    hvstate->srr0 = env->spr[SPR_SRR0];
> +    hvstate->srr1 = env->spr[SPR_SRR1];
> +    hvstate->sprg[0] = env->spr[SPR_SPRG0];
> +    hvstate->sprg[1] = env->spr[SPR_SPRG1];
> +    hvstate->sprg[2] = env->spr[SPR_SPRG2];
> +    hvstate->sprg[3] = env->spr[SPR_SPRG3];
> +    hvstate->pidr = env->spr[SPR_BOOKS_PID];
> +    hvstate->ppr = env->spr[SPR_PPR];
> +
> +    cpu_physical_memory_unmap(hvstate, len, 0 /* read */, len /* access len */);
> +
> +    len = sizeof(*regs);
> +    regs = cpu_physical_memory_map(regs_ptr, &len, true);
> +    if (!regs || len != sizeof(*regs)) {
> +        r3_return = H_P2;
> +        goto out_restore_l1;
> +    }
> +
> +    len = sizeof(env->gpr);
> +    assert(len == sizeof(regs->gpr));
> +    memcpy(regs->gpr, env->gpr, len);
> +
> +    regs->link = env->lr;
> +    regs->ctr = env->ctr;
> +    regs->xer = cpu_read_xer(env);
> +
> +    regs->ccr = 0;
> +    for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
> +        regs->ccr |= (env->crf[i] & 15) << (4 * (7 - i));
> +    }
> +
> +    if (excp == POWERPC_EXCP_MCHECK ||
> +        excp == POWERPC_EXCP_RESET ||
> +        excp == POWERPC_EXCP_SYSCALL) {
> +        regs->nip = env->spr[SPR_SRR0];
> +        regs->msr = env->spr[SPR_SRR1] & env->msr_mask;
> +    } else {
> +        regs->nip = env->spr[SPR_HSRR0];
> +        regs->msr = env->spr[SPR_HSRR1] & env->msr_mask;
> +    }
> +
> +    cpu_physical_memory_unmap(regs, len, 0 /* read */, len /* access len */);
> +
> +out_restore_l1:
> +    memcpy(env->gpr, cpu->nested_host_state->gpr, sizeof(env->gpr));
> +    env->lr = cpu->nested_host_state->lr;
> +    env->ctr = cpu->nested_host_state->ctr;
> +    memcpy(env->crf, cpu->nested_host_state->crf, sizeof(env->crf));
> +    env->cfar = cpu->nested_host_state->cfar;
> +    env->xer = cpu->nested_host_state->xer;
> +    env->so = cpu->nested_host_state->so;
> +    env->ov = cpu->nested_host_state->ov;
> +    env->ov32 = cpu->nested_host_state->ov32;
> +    env->ca32 = cpu->nested_host_state->ca32;
> +    env->msr = cpu->nested_host_state->msr;
> +    env->nip = cpu->nested_host_state->nip;
> +
> +    assert(env->spr[SPR_LPIDR] != 0);
> +    env->spr[SPR_LPCR] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_LPCR];
> +    env->spr[SPR_LPIDR] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_LPIDR];
> +    env->spr[SPR_PCR] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_PCR];
> +    env->spr[SPR_DPDES] = 0;
> +    env->spr[SPR_HFSCR] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_HFSCR];
> +    env->spr[SPR_SRR0] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_SRR0];
> +    env->spr[SPR_SRR1] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_SRR1];
> +    env->spr[SPR_SPRG0] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_SPRG0];
> +    env->spr[SPR_SPRG1] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_SPRG1];
> +    env->spr[SPR_SPRG2] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_SPRG2];
> +    env->spr[SPR_SPRG3] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_SPRG3];
> +    env->spr[SPR_BOOKS_PID] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_BOOKS_PID];
> +    env->spr[SPR_PPR] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_PPR];
> +
> +    g_free(cpu->nested_host_state);
> +    cpu->nested_host_state = NULL;
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Return the interrupt vector address from H_ENTER_NESTED to the L1
> +     * (or error code).
> +     */
> +    env->gpr[3] = r3_return;
> +
> +    hreg_compute_hflags(env);
> +    tlb_flush(cs);
> +    env->reserve_addr = -1; /* Reset the reservation */
> +}
> +
>   static void hypercall_register_types(void)
>   {
>       hypercall_register_softmmu();
> @@ -1555,6 +1871,11 @@ static void hypercall_register_types(void)
>       spapr_register_hypercall(KVMPPC_H_CAS, h_client_architecture_support);
>   
>       spapr_register_hypercall(KVMPPC_H_UPDATE_DT, h_update_dt);
> +
> +    spapr_register_hypercall(KVMPPC_H_SET_PARTITION_TABLE, h_set_ptbl);
> +    spapr_register_hypercall(KVMPPC_H_ENTER_NESTED, h_enter_nested);
> +    spapr_register_hypercall(KVMPPC_H_TLB_INVALIDATE, h_tlb_invalidate);
> +    spapr_register_hypercall(KVMPPC_H_COPY_TOFROM_GUEST, h_copy_tofrom_guest);
>   }
>   
>   type_init(hypercall_register_types)
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> index edbf3eeed0..852fe61b36 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> @@ -199,6 +199,9 @@ struct SpaprMachineState {
>       bool has_graphics;
>       uint32_t vsmt;       /* Virtual SMT mode (KVM's "core stride") */
>   
> +    /* Nested HV support (TCG only) */
> +    uint64_t nested_ptcr;
> +
>       Notifier epow_notifier;
>       QTAILQ_HEAD(, SpaprEventLogEntry) pending_events;
>       bool use_hotplug_event_source;
> @@ -579,7 +582,14 @@ struct SpaprMachineState {
>   #define KVMPPC_H_UPDATE_DT      (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x3)
>   /* 0x4 was used for KVMPPC_H_UPDATE_PHANDLE in SLOF */
>   #define KVMPPC_H_VOF_CLIENT     (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x5)
> -#define KVMPPC_HCALL_MAX        KVMPPC_H_VOF_CLIENT
> +
> +/* Platform-specific hcalls used for nested HV KVM */
> +#define KVMPPC_H_SET_PARTITION_TABLE   (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x800)
> +#define KVMPPC_H_ENTER_NESTED          (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x804)
> +#define KVMPPC_H_TLB_INVALIDATE        (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x808)
> +#define KVMPPC_H_COPY_TOFROM_GUEST     (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x80C)
> +
> +#define KVMPPC_HCALL_MAX        KVMPPC_H_COPY_TOFROM_GUEST
>   
>   /*
>    * The hcall range 0xEF00 to 0xEF80 is reserved for use in facilitating
> @@ -589,6 +599,65 @@ struct SpaprMachineState {
>   #define SVM_H_TPM_COMM              0xEF10
>   #define SVM_HCALL_MAX               SVM_H_TPM_COMM
>   
> +/*
> + * Register state for entering a nested guest with H_ENTER_NESTED.
> + * New member must be added at the end.
> + */
> +struct kvmppc_hv_guest_state {
> +    uint64_t version;        /* version of this structure layout, must be first */
> +    uint32_t lpid;
> +    uint32_t vcpu_token;
> +    /* These registers are hypervisor privileged (at least for writing) */
> +    uint64_t lpcr;
> +    uint64_t pcr;
> +    uint64_t amor;
> +    uint64_t dpdes;
> +    uint64_t hfscr;
> +    int64_t tb_offset;
> +    uint64_t dawr0;
> +    uint64_t dawrx0;
> +    uint64_t ciabr;
> +    uint64_t hdec_expiry;
> +    uint64_t purr;
> +    uint64_t spurr;
> +    uint64_t ic;
> +    uint64_t vtb;
> +    uint64_t hdar;
> +    uint64_t hdsisr;
> +    uint64_t heir;
> +    uint64_t asdr;
> +    /* These are OS privileged but need to be set late in guest entry */
> +    uint64_t srr0;
> +    uint64_t srr1;
> +    uint64_t sprg[4];
> +    uint64_t pidr;
> +    uint64_t cfar;
> +    uint64_t ppr;
> +    /* Version 1 ends here */
> +    uint64_t dawr1;
> +    uint64_t dawrx1;
> +    /* Version 2 ends here */
> +};
> +
> +/* Latest version of hv_guest_state structure */
> +#define HV_GUEST_STATE_VERSION  2
> +
> +/* Linux 64-bit powerpc pt_regs struct, used by nested HV */
> +struct kvmppc_pt_regs {
> +    uint64_t gpr[32];
> +    uint64_t nip;
> +    uint64_t msr;
> +    uint64_t orig_gpr3;    /* Used for restarting system calls */
> +    uint64_t ctr;
> +    uint64_t link;
> +    uint64_t xer;
> +    uint64_t ccr;
> +    uint64_t softe;        /* Soft enabled/disabled */
> +    uint64_t trap;         /* Reason for being here */
> +    uint64_t dar;          /* Fault registers */
> +    uint64_t dsisr;        /* on 4xx/Book-E used for ESR */
> +    uint64_t result;       /* Result of a system call */
> +};

The above structs are shared with KVM for this QEMU implementation.

I don't think they belong to asm-powerpc/kvm.h but how could we keep them
in sync ? The version should be protecting us from unexpected changes.

>   typedef struct SpaprDeviceTreeUpdateHeader {
>       uint32_t version_id;
> @@ -606,6 +675,9 @@ typedef target_ulong (*spapr_hcall_fn)(PowerPCCPU *cpu, SpaprMachineState *sm,
>   void spapr_register_hypercall(target_ulong opcode, spapr_hcall_fn fn);
>   target_ulong spapr_hypercall(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong opcode,
>                                target_ulong *args);
> +
> +void spapr_exit_nested(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int excp);
> +
>   target_ulong softmmu_resize_hpt_prepare(PowerPCCPU *cpu, SpaprMachineState *spapr,
>                                            target_ulong shift);
>   target_ulong softmmu_resize_hpt_commit(PowerPCCPU *cpu, SpaprMachineState *spapr,
> diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu.h b/target/ppc/cpu.h
> index d8cc956c97..65c4401130 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/ppc/cpu.h
> @@ -1301,6 +1301,9 @@ struct PowerPCCPU {
>       bool pre_2_10_migration;
>       bool pre_3_0_migration;
>       int32_t mig_slb_nr;
> +
> +    bool in_spapr_nested;
> +    CPUPPCState *nested_host_state;
>   };   

These new fields belong to SpaprCpuState. I shouldn't be too hard to adapt.

Thanks,

C.
Nicholas Piggin Feb. 16, 2022, 1:16 a.m. UTC | #3
Excerpts from Cédric Le Goater's message of February 16, 2022 4:21 am:
> On 2/15/22 04:16, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> This implements the Nested KVM HV hcall API for spapr under TCG.
>> 
>> The L2 is switched in when the H_ENTER_NESTED hcall is made, and the
>> L1 is switched back in returned from the hcall when a HV exception
>> is sent to the vhyp. Register state is copied in and out according to
>> the nested KVM HV hcall API specification.
>> 
>> The hdecr timer is started when the L2 is switched in, and it provides
>> the HDEC / 0x980 return to L1.
>> 
>> The MMU re-uses the bare metal radix 2-level page table walker by
>> using the get_pate method to point the MMU to the nested partition
>> table entry. MMU faults due to partition scope errors raise HV
>> exceptions and accordingly are routed back to the L1.
>> 
>> The MMU does not tag translations for the L1 (direct) vs L2 (nested)
>> guests, so the TLB is flushed on any L1<->L2 transition (hcall entry
>> and exit).
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   hw/ppc/spapr.c         |  32 +++-
>>   hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c    |  11 +-
>>   hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c   | 321 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/hw/ppc/spapr.h |  74 +++++++++-
>>   target/ppc/cpu.h       |   3 +
>>   5 files changed, 431 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> index 3a5cf92c94..6988e3ec76 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>> @@ -1314,11 +1314,32 @@ static bool spapr_get_pate(PPCVirtualHypervisor *vhyp, PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>>   {
>>       SpaprMachineState *spapr = SPAPR_MACHINE(vhyp);
>>   
>> -    assert(lpid == 0);
>> +    if (!cpu->in_spapr_nested) {
> 
> Since 'in_spapr_nested' is a spapr CPU characteristic, I don't think
> it belongs to PowerPCCPU. See the end of the patch, for a proposal.

SpaprCpuState. Certainly that's a better place, I must have missed it.

> 
> btw, this helps the ordering of files :
> 
> [diff]
> 	orderFile = /path/to/qemu/scripts/git.orderfile
> 
>> +        assert(lpid == 0);
>>   
>> -    /* Copy PATE1:GR into PATE0:HR */
>> -    entry->dw0 = spapr->patb_entry & PATE0_HR;
>> -    entry->dw1 = spapr->patb_entry;
>> +        /* Copy PATE1:GR into PATE0:HR */
>> +        entry->dw0 = spapr->patb_entry & PATE0_HR;
>> +        entry->dw1 = spapr->patb_entry;
>> +
>> +    } else {
>> +        uint64_t patb, pats;
>> +
>> +        assert(lpid != 0);
>> +
>> +        patb = spapr->nested_ptcr & PTCR_PATB;
>> +        pats = spapr->nested_ptcr & PTCR_PATS;
>> +
>> +        /* Calculate number of entries */
>> +        pats = 1ull << (pats + 12 - 4);
>> +        if (pats <= lpid) {
>> +            return false;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        /* Grab entry */
>> +        patb += 16 * lpid;
>> +        entry->dw0 = ldq_phys(CPU(cpu)->as, patb);
>> +        entry->dw1 = ldq_phys(CPU(cpu)->as, patb + 8);
>> +    }
>>   
>>       return true;
>>   }
>> @@ -4472,7 +4493,7 @@ PowerPCCPU *spapr_find_cpu(int vcpu_id)
>>   
>>   static bool spapr_cpu_in_nested(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>>   {
>> -    return false;
>> +    return cpu->in_spapr_nested;
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void spapr_cpu_exec_enter(PPCVirtualHypervisor *vhyp, PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>> @@ -4584,6 +4605,7 @@ static void spapr_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>>       nc->nmi_monitor_handler = spapr_nmi;
>>       smc->phb_placement = spapr_phb_placement;
>>       vhc->cpu_in_nested = spapr_cpu_in_nested;
>> +    vhc->deliver_hv_excp = spapr_exit_nested;
>>       vhc->hypercall = emulate_spapr_hypercall;
>>       vhc->hpt_mask = spapr_hpt_mask;
>>       vhc->map_hptes = spapr_map_hptes;
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c
>> index 5cc80776d0..4d8bb2ad2c 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c
>> @@ -444,19 +444,22 @@ static void cap_nested_kvm_hv_apply(SpaprMachineState *spapr,
>>   {
>>       ERRP_GUARD();
>>       PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(first_cpu);
>> +    CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
>>   
>>       if (!val) {
>>           /* capability disabled by default */
>>           return;
>>       }
>>   
>> -    if (tcg_enabled()) {
>> -        error_setg(errp, "No Nested KVM-HV support in TCG");
> 
> I don't like using KVM-HV (which is KVM-over-PowerNV) when talking about
> KVM-over-pseries. I think the platform name is important. Anyhow, this is
> a more global discussion but we should talk about it someday because these
> HV mode are becoming confusing ! We have PR also :)

The cap is nested-hv and QEMU describes it nested KVM HV. Are we stuck
with that? That could make a name change even more confusing.

It's really a new backend for the KVM HV front end. Like how POWER8 /
POWER9 bare metal backends are completely different now.

But I guess that does not help the end user to understand. On the other
hand, the user might not think "HV" is the HV mode of the CPU and just
thinks of it as "hypervisor".

I like paravirt-hv but nested-hv is not too bad. Anyway I'm happy to
change it.

> 
> 
>> +    if (!(env->insns_flags2 & PPC2_ISA300)) {
>> +        error_setg(errp, "Nested KVM-HV only supported on POWER9 and later");
>>           error_append_hint(errp, "Try appending -machine cap-nested-hv=off\n");
> 
> return ?

Yep.

>> +static target_ulong h_enter_nested(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>> +                                   SpaprMachineState *spapr,
>> +                                   target_ulong opcode,
>> +                                   target_ulong *args)
>> +{
>> +    PowerPCCPUClass *pcc = POWERPC_CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
>> +    CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
>> +    CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
>> +    target_ulong hv_ptr = args[0];
>> +    target_ulong regs_ptr = args[1];
>> +    target_ulong hdec, now = cpu_ppc_load_tbl(env);
>> +    target_ulong lpcr, lpcr_mask;
>> +    struct kvmppc_hv_guest_state *hvstate;
>> +    struct kvmppc_hv_guest_state hv_state;
>> +    struct kvmppc_pt_regs *regs;
>> +    hwaddr len;
>> +    uint32_t cr;
>> +    int i;
>> +
>> +    if (cpu->in_spapr_nested) {
>> +        return H_FUNCTION;
> 
> That would be an L3 :)

Well if the L2 makes the hcall, vhyp won't handle it but rather it 
will cause L2 exit to L1 and the L1 will handle the H_ENTER_NESTED
hcall. So we can (and have) run an L3 guest under the L2 of this
machine :)

This is probably more of an assert(!cpu->in_spapr_nested). Actually
that assert could go in the general spapr hypercall handler.

> 
>> +    }
>> +    if (spapr->nested_ptcr == 0) {
>> +        return H_NOT_AVAILABLE;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    len = sizeof(*hvstate);
>> +    hvstate = cpu_physical_memory_map(hv_ptr, &len, true);
> 
> When a CPU is available, I would prefer :
> 
>      hvstate = address_space_map(CPU(cpu)->as, hv_ptr, &len, true,
>                                MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
>      
> like ppc_hash64_map_hptes() does. This is minor.

I'll check it out. Still not entire sure about read+write access
though.

> 
>> +    if (!hvstate || len != sizeof(*hvstate)) {
>> +        return H_PARAMETER;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    memcpy(&hv_state, hvstate, len);
>> +
>> +    cpu_physical_memory_unmap(hvstate, len, 0 /* read */, len /* access len */);
> 
> checkpatch will complain with the above comments.

Yeah it did. Turns out I also had a bug where I missed setting write 
access further down.

> 
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * We accept versions 1 and 2. Version 2 fields are unused because TCG
>> +     * does not implement DAWR*.
>> +     */
>> +    if (hv_state.version > HV_GUEST_STATE_VERSION) {
>> +        return H_PARAMETER;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    cpu->nested_host_state = g_try_malloc(sizeof(CPUPPCState));
> 
> I think we could preallocate this buffer once we know nested are supported,
> or if we keep it, it could be our 'in_spapr_nested' indicator.

That's true. I kind of liked to allocate on demand, but for performance 
and robustness might be better to keep it around (could allocate when we
see a H_SET_PARTITION_TABLE.

I'll just keep it as is for the first iteration. Probably in fact we 
would rather make a specific structure for it that only has what we
require rather than the entire CPUPPCState so all this can be optimised
a bit in a later round.

>> +struct kvmppc_hv_guest_state {
>> +    uint64_t version;        /* version of this structure layout, must be first */
>> +    uint32_t lpid;
>> +    uint32_t vcpu_token;
>> +    /* These registers are hypervisor privileged (at least for writing) */
>> +    uint64_t lpcr;
>> +    uint64_t pcr;
>> +    uint64_t amor;
>> +    uint64_t dpdes;
>> +    uint64_t hfscr;
>> +    int64_t tb_offset;
>> +    uint64_t dawr0;
>> +    uint64_t dawrx0;
>> +    uint64_t ciabr;
>> +    uint64_t hdec_expiry;
>> +    uint64_t purr;
>> +    uint64_t spurr;
>> +    uint64_t ic;
>> +    uint64_t vtb;
>> +    uint64_t hdar;
>> +    uint64_t hdsisr;
>> +    uint64_t heir;
>> +    uint64_t asdr;
>> +    /* These are OS privileged but need to be set late in guest entry */
>> +    uint64_t srr0;
>> +    uint64_t srr1;
>> +    uint64_t sprg[4];
>> +    uint64_t pidr;
>> +    uint64_t cfar;
>> +    uint64_t ppr;
>> +    /* Version 1 ends here */
>> +    uint64_t dawr1;
>> +    uint64_t dawrx1;
>> +    /* Version 2 ends here */
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Latest version of hv_guest_state structure */
>> +#define HV_GUEST_STATE_VERSION  2
>> +
>> +/* Linux 64-bit powerpc pt_regs struct, used by nested HV */
>> +struct kvmppc_pt_regs {
>> +    uint64_t gpr[32];
>> +    uint64_t nip;
>> +    uint64_t msr;
>> +    uint64_t orig_gpr3;    /* Used for restarting system calls */
>> +    uint64_t ctr;
>> +    uint64_t link;
>> +    uint64_t xer;
>> +    uint64_t ccr;
>> +    uint64_t softe;        /* Soft enabled/disabled */
>> +    uint64_t trap;         /* Reason for being here */
>> +    uint64_t dar;          /* Fault registers */
>> +    uint64_t dsisr;        /* on 4xx/Book-E used for ESR */
>> +    uint64_t result;       /* Result of a system call */
>> +};
> 
> The above structs are shared with KVM for this QEMU implementation.
> 
> I don't think they belong to asm-powerpc/kvm.h but how could we keep them
> in sync ? The version should be protecting us from unexpected changes.

Not sure how we should do that. How are other PAPR API definitions kept
in synch? I guess they just have a document spec for the upstream. Paul
made a spec document for the nested HV stuff, not sure if he's put it up
in public anywhere. Maybe we could maintain it in linux/Documentation/
or similar?

Anyway for now I guess we keep this?

>> diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu.h b/target/ppc/cpu.h
>> index d8cc956c97..65c4401130 100644
>> --- a/target/ppc/cpu.h
>> +++ b/target/ppc/cpu.h
>> @@ -1301,6 +1301,9 @@ struct PowerPCCPU {
>>       bool pre_2_10_migration;
>>       bool pre_3_0_migration;
>>       int32_t mig_slb_nr;
>> +
>> +    bool in_spapr_nested;
>> +    CPUPPCState *nested_host_state;
>>   };   
> 
> These new fields belong to SpaprCpuState. I shouldn't be too hard to adapt.

Thanks for the pointer, that's what I was looking for. Must not have
looked very hard :)

Thanks,
Nick
Cédric Le Goater Feb. 16, 2022, 10:23 a.m. UTC | #4
On 2/16/22 02:16, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Excerpts from Cédric Le Goater's message of February 16, 2022 4:21 am:
>> On 2/15/22 04:16, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>>> This implements the Nested KVM HV hcall API for spapr under TCG.
>>>
>>> The L2 is switched in when the H_ENTER_NESTED hcall is made, and the
>>> L1 is switched back in returned from the hcall when a HV exception
>>> is sent to the vhyp. Register state is copied in and out according to
>>> the nested KVM HV hcall API specification.
>>>
>>> The hdecr timer is started when the L2 is switched in, and it provides
>>> the HDEC / 0x980 return to L1.
>>>
>>> The MMU re-uses the bare metal radix 2-level page table walker by
>>> using the get_pate method to point the MMU to the nested partition
>>> table entry. MMU faults due to partition scope errors raise HV
>>> exceptions and accordingly are routed back to the L1.
>>>
>>> The MMU does not tag translations for the L1 (direct) vs L2 (nested)
>>> guests, so the TLB is flushed on any L1<->L2 transition (hcall entry
>>> and exit).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>    hw/ppc/spapr.c         |  32 +++-
>>>    hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c    |  11 +-
>>>    hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c   | 321 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    include/hw/ppc/spapr.h |  74 +++++++++-
>>>    target/ppc/cpu.h       |   3 +
>>>    5 files changed, 431 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>>> index 3a5cf92c94..6988e3ec76 100644
>>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
>>> @@ -1314,11 +1314,32 @@ static bool spapr_get_pate(PPCVirtualHypervisor *vhyp, PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>>>    {
>>>        SpaprMachineState *spapr = SPAPR_MACHINE(vhyp);
>>>    
>>> -    assert(lpid == 0);
>>> +    if (!cpu->in_spapr_nested) {
>>
>> Since 'in_spapr_nested' is a spapr CPU characteristic, I don't think
>> it belongs to PowerPCCPU. See the end of the patch, for a proposal.
> 
> SpaprCpuState. Certainly that's a better place, I must have missed it.
> 
>>
>> btw, this helps the ordering of files :
>>
>> [diff]
>> 	orderFile = /path/to/qemu/scripts/git.orderfile
>>
>>> +        assert(lpid == 0);
>>>    
>>> -    /* Copy PATE1:GR into PATE0:HR */
>>> -    entry->dw0 = spapr->patb_entry & PATE0_HR;
>>> -    entry->dw1 = spapr->patb_entry;
>>> +        /* Copy PATE1:GR into PATE0:HR */
>>> +        entry->dw0 = spapr->patb_entry & PATE0_HR;
>>> +        entry->dw1 = spapr->patb_entry;
>>> +
>>> +    } else {
>>> +        uint64_t patb, pats;
>>> +
>>> +        assert(lpid != 0);
>>> +
>>> +        patb = spapr->nested_ptcr & PTCR_PATB;
>>> +        pats = spapr->nested_ptcr & PTCR_PATS;
>>> +
>>> +        /* Calculate number of entries */
>>> +        pats = 1ull << (pats + 12 - 4);
>>> +        if (pats <= lpid) {
>>> +            return false;
>>> +        }
>>> +
>>> +        /* Grab entry */
>>> +        patb += 16 * lpid;
>>> +        entry->dw0 = ldq_phys(CPU(cpu)->as, patb);
>>> +        entry->dw1 = ldq_phys(CPU(cpu)->as, patb + 8);
>>> +    }
>>>    
>>>        return true;
>>>    }
>>> @@ -4472,7 +4493,7 @@ PowerPCCPU *spapr_find_cpu(int vcpu_id)
>>>    
>>>    static bool spapr_cpu_in_nested(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>>>    {
>>> -    return false;
>>> +    return cpu->in_spapr_nested;
>>>    }
>>>    
>>>    static void spapr_cpu_exec_enter(PPCVirtualHypervisor *vhyp, PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>>> @@ -4584,6 +4605,7 @@ static void spapr_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>>>        nc->nmi_monitor_handler = spapr_nmi;
>>>        smc->phb_placement = spapr_phb_placement;
>>>        vhc->cpu_in_nested = spapr_cpu_in_nested;
>>> +    vhc->deliver_hv_excp = spapr_exit_nested;
>>>        vhc->hypercall = emulate_spapr_hypercall;
>>>        vhc->hpt_mask = spapr_hpt_mask;
>>>        vhc->map_hptes = spapr_map_hptes;
>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c
>>> index 5cc80776d0..4d8bb2ad2c 100644
>>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c
>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c
>>> @@ -444,19 +444,22 @@ static void cap_nested_kvm_hv_apply(SpaprMachineState *spapr,
>>>    {
>>>        ERRP_GUARD();
>>>        PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(first_cpu);
>>> +    CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
>>>    
>>>        if (!val) {
>>>            /* capability disabled by default */
>>>            return;
>>>        }
>>>    
>>> -    if (tcg_enabled()) {
>>> -        error_setg(errp, "No Nested KVM-HV support in TCG");
>>
>> I don't like using KVM-HV (which is KVM-over-PowerNV) when talking about
>> KVM-over-pseries. I think the platform name is important. Anyhow, this is
>> a more global discussion but we should talk about it someday because these
>> HV mode are becoming confusing ! We have PR also :)
> 
> The cap is nested-hv and QEMU describes it nested KVM HV. Are we stuck
> with that? That could make a name change even more confusing.
> 
> It's really a new backend for the KVM HV front end. Like how POWER8 /
> POWER9 bare metal backends are completely different now.
> 
> But I guess that does not help the end user to understand. On the other
> hand, the user might not think "HV" is the HV mode of the CPU and just
> thinks of it as "hypervisor".
> 
> I like paravirt-hv but nested-hv is not too bad. Anyway I'm happy to
> change it.
> 
>>
>>
>>> +    if (!(env->insns_flags2 & PPC2_ISA300)) {
>>> +        error_setg(errp, "Nested KVM-HV only supported on POWER9 and later");
>>>            error_append_hint(errp, "Try appending -machine cap-nested-hv=off\n");
>>
>> return ?
> 
> Yep.
> 
>>> +static target_ulong h_enter_nested(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>>> +                                   SpaprMachineState *spapr,
>>> +                                   target_ulong opcode,
>>> +                                   target_ulong *args)
>>> +{
>>> +    PowerPCCPUClass *pcc = POWERPC_CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
>>> +    CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
>>> +    CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
>>> +    target_ulong hv_ptr = args[0];
>>> +    target_ulong regs_ptr = args[1];
>>> +    target_ulong hdec, now = cpu_ppc_load_tbl(env);
>>> +    target_ulong lpcr, lpcr_mask;
>>> +    struct kvmppc_hv_guest_state *hvstate;
>>> +    struct kvmppc_hv_guest_state hv_state;
>>> +    struct kvmppc_pt_regs *regs;
>>> +    hwaddr len;
>>> +    uint32_t cr;
>>> +    int i;
>>> +
>>> +    if (cpu->in_spapr_nested) {
>>> +        return H_FUNCTION;
>>
>> That would be an L3 :)
> 
> Well if the L2 makes the hcall, vhyp won't handle it but rather it
> will cause L2 exit to L1 and the L1 will handle the H_ENTER_NESTED
> hcall. So we can (and have) run an L3 guest under the L2 of this
> machine :)
>
> This is probably more of an assert(!cpu->in_spapr_nested). Actually
> that assert could go in the general spapr hypercall handler.
> 
>>
>>> +    }
>>> +    if (spapr->nested_ptcr == 0) {
>>> +        return H_NOT_AVAILABLE;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    len = sizeof(*hvstate);
>>> +    hvstate = cpu_physical_memory_map(hv_ptr, &len, true);
>>
>> When a CPU is available, I would prefer :
>>
>>       hvstate = address_space_map(CPU(cpu)->as, hv_ptr, &len, true,
>>                                 MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
>>       
>> like ppc_hash64_map_hptes() does. This is minor.
> 
> I'll check it out. Still not entire sure about read+write access
> though.
> 
>>
>>> +    if (!hvstate || len != sizeof(*hvstate)) {
>>> +        return H_PARAMETER;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    memcpy(&hv_state, hvstate, len);
>>> +
>>> +    cpu_physical_memory_unmap(hvstate, len, 0 /* read */, len /* access len */);
>>
>> checkpatch will complain with the above comments.
> 
> Yeah it did. Turns out I also had a bug where I missed setting write
> access further down.
> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +    /*
>>> +     * We accept versions 1 and 2. Version 2 fields are unused because TCG
>>> +     * does not implement DAWR*.
>>> +     */
>>> +    if (hv_state.version > HV_GUEST_STATE_VERSION) {
>>> +        return H_PARAMETER;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    cpu->nested_host_state = g_try_malloc(sizeof(CPUPPCState));
>>
>> I think we could preallocate this buffer once we know nested are supported,
>> or if we keep it, it could be our 'in_spapr_nested' indicator.
> 
> That's true. I kind of liked to allocate on demand, but for performance
> and robustness might be better to keep it around (could allocate when we
> see a H_SET_PARTITION_TABLE.
> 
> I'll just keep it as is for the first iteration. Probably in fact we
> would rather make a specific structure for it that only has what we
> require rather than the entire CPUPPCState so all this can be optimised
> a bit in a later round.

Sure. keep in mind that the pseries machine migrates and this is extra state
to carry on the other side. vmstate_spapr_cpu_state should be modified.

>>> +struct kvmppc_hv_guest_state {
>>> +    uint64_t version;        /* version of this structure layout, must be first */
>>> +    uint32_t lpid;
>>> +    uint32_t vcpu_token;
>>> +    /* These registers are hypervisor privileged (at least for writing) */
>>> +    uint64_t lpcr;
>>> +    uint64_t pcr;
>>> +    uint64_t amor;
>>> +    uint64_t dpdes;
>>> +    uint64_t hfscr;
>>> +    int64_t tb_offset;
>>> +    uint64_t dawr0;
>>> +    uint64_t dawrx0;
>>> +    uint64_t ciabr;
>>> +    uint64_t hdec_expiry;
>>> +    uint64_t purr;
>>> +    uint64_t spurr;
>>> +    uint64_t ic;
>>> +    uint64_t vtb;
>>> +    uint64_t hdar;
>>> +    uint64_t hdsisr;
>>> +    uint64_t heir;
>>> +    uint64_t asdr;
>>> +    /* These are OS privileged but need to be set late in guest entry */
>>> +    uint64_t srr0;
>>> +    uint64_t srr1;
>>> +    uint64_t sprg[4];
>>> +    uint64_t pidr;
>>> +    uint64_t cfar;
>>> +    uint64_t ppr;
>>> +    /* Version 1 ends here */
>>> +    uint64_t dawr1;
>>> +    uint64_t dawrx1;
>>> +    /* Version 2 ends here */
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +/* Latest version of hv_guest_state structure */
>>> +#define HV_GUEST_STATE_VERSION  2
>>> +
>>> +/* Linux 64-bit powerpc pt_regs struct, used by nested HV */
>>> +struct kvmppc_pt_regs {
>>> +    uint64_t gpr[32];
>>> +    uint64_t nip;
>>> +    uint64_t msr;
>>> +    uint64_t orig_gpr3;    /* Used for restarting system calls */
>>> +    uint64_t ctr;
>>> +    uint64_t link;
>>> +    uint64_t xer;
>>> +    uint64_t ccr;
>>> +    uint64_t softe;        /* Soft enabled/disabled */
>>> +    uint64_t trap;         /* Reason for being here */
>>> +    uint64_t dar;          /* Fault registers */
>>> +    uint64_t dsisr;        /* on 4xx/Book-E used for ESR */
>>> +    uint64_t result;       /* Result of a system call */
>>> +};
>>
>> The above structs are shared with KVM for this QEMU implementation.
>>
>> I don't think they belong to asm-powerpc/kvm.h but how could we keep them
>> in sync ? The version should be protecting us from unexpected changes.
> 
> Not sure how we should do that. How are other PAPR API definitions kept
> in synch? I guess they just have a document spec for the upstream. Paul
> made a spec document for the nested HV stuff, not sure if he's put it up
> in public anywhere. Maybe we could maintain it in linux/Documentation/
> or similar?

yes. under linux/Documentation/virt/kvm/

> Anyway for now I guess we keep this?

Yes. May be in its own private header. Something like hw/ppc/spapr_nested.h


Thanks,

C.


>>> diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu.h b/target/ppc/cpu.h
>>> index d8cc956c97..65c4401130 100644
>>> --- a/target/ppc/cpu.h
>>> +++ b/target/ppc/cpu.h
>>> @@ -1301,6 +1301,9 @@ struct PowerPCCPU {
>>>        bool pre_2_10_migration;
>>>        bool pre_3_0_migration;
>>>        int32_t mig_slb_nr;
>>> +
>>> +    bool in_spapr_nested;
>>> +    CPUPPCState *nested_host_state;
>>>    };
>>
>> These new fields belong to SpaprCpuState. I shouldn't be too hard to adapt.
> 
> Thanks for the pointer, that's what I was looking for. Must not have
> looked very hard :)
> 
> Thanks,
> Nick
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
index 3a5cf92c94..6988e3ec76 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
@@ -1314,11 +1314,32 @@  static bool spapr_get_pate(PPCVirtualHypervisor *vhyp, PowerPCCPU *cpu,
 {
     SpaprMachineState *spapr = SPAPR_MACHINE(vhyp);
 
-    assert(lpid == 0);
+    if (!cpu->in_spapr_nested) {
+        assert(lpid == 0);
 
-    /* Copy PATE1:GR into PATE0:HR */
-    entry->dw0 = spapr->patb_entry & PATE0_HR;
-    entry->dw1 = spapr->patb_entry;
+        /* Copy PATE1:GR into PATE0:HR */
+        entry->dw0 = spapr->patb_entry & PATE0_HR;
+        entry->dw1 = spapr->patb_entry;
+
+    } else {
+        uint64_t patb, pats;
+
+        assert(lpid != 0);
+
+        patb = spapr->nested_ptcr & PTCR_PATB;
+        pats = spapr->nested_ptcr & PTCR_PATS;
+
+        /* Calculate number of entries */
+        pats = 1ull << (pats + 12 - 4);
+        if (pats <= lpid) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        /* Grab entry */
+        patb += 16 * lpid;
+        entry->dw0 = ldq_phys(CPU(cpu)->as, patb);
+        entry->dw1 = ldq_phys(CPU(cpu)->as, patb + 8);
+    }
 
     return true;
 }
@@ -4472,7 +4493,7 @@  PowerPCCPU *spapr_find_cpu(int vcpu_id)
 
 static bool spapr_cpu_in_nested(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
 {
-    return false;
+    return cpu->in_spapr_nested;
 }
 
 static void spapr_cpu_exec_enter(PPCVirtualHypervisor *vhyp, PowerPCCPU *cpu)
@@ -4584,6 +4605,7 @@  static void spapr_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
     nc->nmi_monitor_handler = spapr_nmi;
     smc->phb_placement = spapr_phb_placement;
     vhc->cpu_in_nested = spapr_cpu_in_nested;
+    vhc->deliver_hv_excp = spapr_exit_nested;
     vhc->hypercall = emulate_spapr_hypercall;
     vhc->hpt_mask = spapr_hpt_mask;
     vhc->map_hptes = spapr_map_hptes;
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c
index 5cc80776d0..4d8bb2ad2c 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_caps.c
@@ -444,19 +444,22 @@  static void cap_nested_kvm_hv_apply(SpaprMachineState *spapr,
 {
     ERRP_GUARD();
     PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(first_cpu);
+    CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
 
     if (!val) {
         /* capability disabled by default */
         return;
     }
 
-    if (tcg_enabled()) {
-        error_setg(errp, "No Nested KVM-HV support in TCG");
+    if (!(env->insns_flags2 & PPC2_ISA300)) {
+        error_setg(errp, "Nested KVM-HV only supported on POWER9 and later");
         error_append_hint(errp, "Try appending -machine cap-nested-hv=off\n");
-    } else if (kvm_enabled()) {
+    }
+
+    if (kvm_enabled()) {
         if (!ppc_check_compat(cpu, CPU_POWERPC_LOGICAL_3_00, 0,
                               spapr->max_compat_pvr)) {
-            error_setg(errp, "Nested KVM-HV only supported on POWER9");
+            error_setg(errp, "Nested KVM-HV only supported on POWER9 and later");
             error_append_hint(errp,
                               "Try appending -machine max-cpu-compat=power9\n");
             return;
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
index 5dec056796..3129fae90d 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ 
 #include "qemu/error-report.h"
 #include "exec/exec-all.h"
 #include "helper_regs.h"
+#include "hw/ppc/ppc.h"
 #include "hw/ppc/spapr.h"
 #include "hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h"
 #include "mmu-hash64.h"
@@ -1500,6 +1501,321 @@  static void hypercall_register_softmmu(void)
 }
 #endif
 
+/* TCG only */
+#define PRTS_MASK      0x1f
+
+static target_ulong h_set_ptbl(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
+                               SpaprMachineState *spapr,
+                               target_ulong opcode,
+                               target_ulong *args)
+{
+    target_ulong ptcr = args[0];
+
+    if (!spapr_get_cap(spapr, SPAPR_CAP_NESTED_KVM_HV)) {
+        return H_FUNCTION;
+    }
+
+    if ((ptcr & PRTS_MASK) + 12 - 4 > 12) {
+        return H_PARAMETER;
+    }
+
+    spapr->nested_ptcr = ptcr; /* Save new partition table */
+
+    return H_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static target_ulong h_tlb_invalidate(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
+                                     SpaprMachineState *spapr,
+                                     target_ulong opcode,
+                                     target_ulong *args)
+{
+    /*
+     * The spapr virtual hypervisor nested HV implementation retains no L2
+     * translation state except for TLB. And the TLB is always invalidated
+     * across L1<->L2 transitions, so nothing is required here.
+     */
+
+    return H_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static target_ulong h_copy_tofrom_guest(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
+                                        SpaprMachineState *spapr,
+                                        target_ulong opcode,
+                                        target_ulong *args)
+{
+    /*
+     * This HCALL is not required, L1 KVM will take a slow path and walk the
+     * page tables manually to do the data copy.
+     */
+    return H_FUNCTION;
+}
+
+/*
+ * When this handler returns, the environment is switched to the L2 guest
+ * and TCG begins running that. spapr_exit_nested() performs the switch from
+ * L2 back to L1 and returns from the H_ENTER_NESTED hcall.
+ */
+static target_ulong h_enter_nested(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
+                                   SpaprMachineState *spapr,
+                                   target_ulong opcode,
+                                   target_ulong *args)
+{
+    PowerPCCPUClass *pcc = POWERPC_CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
+    CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
+    CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
+    target_ulong hv_ptr = args[0];
+    target_ulong regs_ptr = args[1];
+    target_ulong hdec, now = cpu_ppc_load_tbl(env);
+    target_ulong lpcr, lpcr_mask;
+    struct kvmppc_hv_guest_state *hvstate;
+    struct kvmppc_hv_guest_state hv_state;
+    struct kvmppc_pt_regs *regs;
+    hwaddr len;
+    uint32_t cr;
+    int i;
+
+    if (cpu->in_spapr_nested) {
+        return H_FUNCTION;
+    }
+    if (spapr->nested_ptcr == 0) {
+        return H_NOT_AVAILABLE;
+    }
+
+    len = sizeof(*hvstate);
+    hvstate = cpu_physical_memory_map(hv_ptr, &len, true);
+    if (!hvstate || len != sizeof(*hvstate)) {
+        return H_PARAMETER;
+    }
+
+    memcpy(&hv_state, hvstate, len);
+
+    cpu_physical_memory_unmap(hvstate, len, 0 /* read */, len /* access len */);
+
+    /*
+     * We accept versions 1 and 2. Version 2 fields are unused because TCG
+     * does not implement DAWR*.
+     */
+    if (hv_state.version > HV_GUEST_STATE_VERSION) {
+        return H_PARAMETER;
+    }
+
+    cpu->nested_host_state = g_try_malloc(sizeof(CPUPPCState));
+    if (!cpu->nested_host_state) {
+        return H_NO_MEM;
+    }
+
+    memcpy(cpu->nested_host_state, env, sizeof(CPUPPCState));
+
+    len = sizeof(*regs);
+    regs = cpu_physical_memory_map(regs_ptr, &len, true);
+    if (!regs || len != sizeof(*regs)) {
+        g_free(cpu->nested_host_state);
+        return H_P2;
+    }
+
+    len = sizeof(env->gpr);
+    assert(len == sizeof(regs->gpr));
+    memcpy(env->gpr, regs->gpr, len);
+
+    env->lr = regs->link;
+    env->ctr = regs->ctr;
+    cpu_write_xer(env, regs->xer);
+
+    cr = regs->ccr;
+    for (i = 7; i >= 0; i--) {
+        env->crf[i] = cr & 15;
+        cr >>= 4;
+    }
+
+    env->msr = regs->msr;
+    env->nip = regs->nip;
+
+    cpu_physical_memory_unmap(regs, len, 0 /* read */, len /* access len */);
+
+    env->cfar = hv_state.cfar;
+
+    assert(env->spr[SPR_LPIDR] == 0);
+    env->spr[SPR_LPIDR] = hv_state.lpid;
+
+    lpcr_mask = LPCR_DPFD | LPCR_ILE | LPCR_AIL | LPCR_LD | LPCR_MER;
+    lpcr = (env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & ~lpcr_mask) | (hv_state.lpcr & lpcr_mask);
+    lpcr |= LPCR_HR | LPCR_UPRT | LPCR_GTSE | LPCR_HVICE | LPCR_HDICE;
+    lpcr &= ~LPCR_LPES0;
+    env->spr[SPR_LPCR] = lpcr & pcc->lpcr_mask;
+
+    env->spr[SPR_PCR] = hv_state.pcr;
+    /* hv_state.amor is not used */
+    env->spr[SPR_DPDES] = hv_state.dpdes;
+    env->spr[SPR_HFSCR] = hv_state.hfscr;
+    hdec = hv_state.hdec_expiry - now;
+    env->tb_env->tb_offset += hv_state.tb_offset;
+    /* TCG does not implement DAWR*, CIABR, PURR, SPURR, IC, VTB, HEIR SPRs*/
+    env->spr[SPR_SRR0] = hv_state.srr0;
+    env->spr[SPR_SRR1] = hv_state.srr1;
+    env->spr[SPR_SPRG0] = hv_state.sprg[0];
+    env->spr[SPR_SPRG1] = hv_state.sprg[1];
+    env->spr[SPR_SPRG2] = hv_state.sprg[2];
+    env->spr[SPR_SPRG3] = hv_state.sprg[3];
+    env->spr[SPR_BOOKS_PID] = hv_state.pidr;
+    env->spr[SPR_PPR] = hv_state.ppr;
+
+    cpu_ppc_hdecr_init(env);
+    cpu_ppc_store_hdecr(env, hdec);
+
+    /*
+     * The hv_state.vcpu_token is not needed. It is used by the KVM
+     * implementation to remember which L2 vCPU last ran on which physical
+     * CPU so as to invalidate process scope translations if it is moved
+     * between physical CPUs. For now TLBs are always flushed on L1<->L2
+     * transitions so this is not a problem.
+     *
+     * Could validate that the same vcpu_token does not attempt to run on
+     * different L1 vCPUs at the same time, but that would be a L1 KVM bug
+     * and it's not obviously worth a new data structure to do it.
+     */
+
+    cpu->in_spapr_nested = true;
+
+    hreg_compute_hflags(env);
+    tlb_flush(cs);
+    env->reserve_addr = -1; /* Reset the reservation */
+
+    /*
+     * The spapr hcall helper sets env->gpr[3] to the return value, but at
+     * this point the L1 is not returning from the hcall but rather we
+     * start running the L2, so r3 must not be clobbered, so return env->gpr[3]
+     * to leave it unchanged.
+     */
+    return env->gpr[3];
+}
+
+void spapr_exit_nested(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int excp)
+{
+    CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
+    CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
+    target_ulong r3_return = env->excp_vectors[excp]; /* hcall return value */
+    target_ulong hv_ptr = cpu->nested_host_state->gpr[4];
+    target_ulong regs_ptr = cpu->nested_host_state->gpr[5];
+    struct kvmppc_hv_guest_state *hvstate;
+    struct kvmppc_pt_regs *regs;
+    hwaddr len;
+    int i;
+
+    assert(cpu->in_spapr_nested);
+    cpu->in_spapr_nested = false;
+
+    cpu_ppc_hdecr_exit(env);
+
+    len = sizeof(*hvstate);
+    hvstate = cpu_physical_memory_map(hv_ptr, &len, true);
+    if (!hvstate || len != sizeof(*hvstate)) {
+        r3_return = H_PARAMETER;
+        goto out_restore_l1;
+    }
+
+    env->tb_env->tb_offset -= hvstate->tb_offset;
+
+    hvstate->cfar = env->cfar;
+    hvstate->lpcr = env->spr[SPR_LPCR];
+    hvstate->pcr = env->spr[SPR_PCR];
+    hvstate->dpdes = env->spr[SPR_DPDES];
+    hvstate->hfscr = env->spr[SPR_HFSCR];
+
+    if (excp == POWERPC_EXCP_HDSI) {
+        hvstate->hdar = env->spr[SPR_HDAR];
+        hvstate->hdsisr = env->spr[SPR_HDSISR];
+        hvstate->asdr = env->spr[SPR_ASDR];
+    } else if (excp == POWERPC_EXCP_HISI) {
+        hvstate->asdr = env->spr[SPR_ASDR];
+    }
+
+    /* HEIR should be implemented for HV mode and saved here. */
+    hvstate->srr0 = env->spr[SPR_SRR0];
+    hvstate->srr1 = env->spr[SPR_SRR1];
+    hvstate->sprg[0] = env->spr[SPR_SPRG0];
+    hvstate->sprg[1] = env->spr[SPR_SPRG1];
+    hvstate->sprg[2] = env->spr[SPR_SPRG2];
+    hvstate->sprg[3] = env->spr[SPR_SPRG3];
+    hvstate->pidr = env->spr[SPR_BOOKS_PID];
+    hvstate->ppr = env->spr[SPR_PPR];
+
+    cpu_physical_memory_unmap(hvstate, len, 0 /* read */, len /* access len */);
+
+    len = sizeof(*regs);
+    regs = cpu_physical_memory_map(regs_ptr, &len, true);
+    if (!regs || len != sizeof(*regs)) {
+        r3_return = H_P2;
+        goto out_restore_l1;
+    }
+
+    len = sizeof(env->gpr);
+    assert(len == sizeof(regs->gpr));
+    memcpy(regs->gpr, env->gpr, len);
+
+    regs->link = env->lr;
+    regs->ctr = env->ctr;
+    regs->xer = cpu_read_xer(env);
+
+    regs->ccr = 0;
+    for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
+        regs->ccr |= (env->crf[i] & 15) << (4 * (7 - i));
+    }
+
+    if (excp == POWERPC_EXCP_MCHECK ||
+        excp == POWERPC_EXCP_RESET ||
+        excp == POWERPC_EXCP_SYSCALL) {
+        regs->nip = env->spr[SPR_SRR0];
+        regs->msr = env->spr[SPR_SRR1] & env->msr_mask;
+    } else {
+        regs->nip = env->spr[SPR_HSRR0];
+        regs->msr = env->spr[SPR_HSRR1] & env->msr_mask;
+    }
+
+    cpu_physical_memory_unmap(regs, len, 0 /* read */, len /* access len */);
+
+out_restore_l1:
+    memcpy(env->gpr, cpu->nested_host_state->gpr, sizeof(env->gpr));
+    env->lr = cpu->nested_host_state->lr;
+    env->ctr = cpu->nested_host_state->ctr;
+    memcpy(env->crf, cpu->nested_host_state->crf, sizeof(env->crf));
+    env->cfar = cpu->nested_host_state->cfar;
+    env->xer = cpu->nested_host_state->xer;
+    env->so = cpu->nested_host_state->so;
+    env->ov = cpu->nested_host_state->ov;
+    env->ov32 = cpu->nested_host_state->ov32;
+    env->ca32 = cpu->nested_host_state->ca32;
+    env->msr = cpu->nested_host_state->msr;
+    env->nip = cpu->nested_host_state->nip;
+
+    assert(env->spr[SPR_LPIDR] != 0);
+    env->spr[SPR_LPCR] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_LPCR];
+    env->spr[SPR_LPIDR] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_LPIDR];
+    env->spr[SPR_PCR] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_PCR];
+    env->spr[SPR_DPDES] = 0;
+    env->spr[SPR_HFSCR] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_HFSCR];
+    env->spr[SPR_SRR0] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_SRR0];
+    env->spr[SPR_SRR1] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_SRR1];
+    env->spr[SPR_SPRG0] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_SPRG0];
+    env->spr[SPR_SPRG1] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_SPRG1];
+    env->spr[SPR_SPRG2] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_SPRG2];
+    env->spr[SPR_SPRG3] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_SPRG3];
+    env->spr[SPR_BOOKS_PID] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_BOOKS_PID];
+    env->spr[SPR_PPR] = cpu->nested_host_state->spr[SPR_PPR];
+
+    g_free(cpu->nested_host_state);
+    cpu->nested_host_state = NULL;
+
+    /*
+     * Return the interrupt vector address from H_ENTER_NESTED to the L1
+     * (or error code).
+     */
+    env->gpr[3] = r3_return;
+
+    hreg_compute_hflags(env);
+    tlb_flush(cs);
+    env->reserve_addr = -1; /* Reset the reservation */
+}
+
 static void hypercall_register_types(void)
 {
     hypercall_register_softmmu();
@@ -1555,6 +1871,11 @@  static void hypercall_register_types(void)
     spapr_register_hypercall(KVMPPC_H_CAS, h_client_architecture_support);
 
     spapr_register_hypercall(KVMPPC_H_UPDATE_DT, h_update_dt);
+
+    spapr_register_hypercall(KVMPPC_H_SET_PARTITION_TABLE, h_set_ptbl);
+    spapr_register_hypercall(KVMPPC_H_ENTER_NESTED, h_enter_nested);
+    spapr_register_hypercall(KVMPPC_H_TLB_INVALIDATE, h_tlb_invalidate);
+    spapr_register_hypercall(KVMPPC_H_COPY_TOFROM_GUEST, h_copy_tofrom_guest);
 }
 
 type_init(hypercall_register_types)
diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
index edbf3eeed0..852fe61b36 100644
--- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
+++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
@@ -199,6 +199,9 @@  struct SpaprMachineState {
     bool has_graphics;
     uint32_t vsmt;       /* Virtual SMT mode (KVM's "core stride") */
 
+    /* Nested HV support (TCG only) */
+    uint64_t nested_ptcr;
+
     Notifier epow_notifier;
     QTAILQ_HEAD(, SpaprEventLogEntry) pending_events;
     bool use_hotplug_event_source;
@@ -579,7 +582,14 @@  struct SpaprMachineState {
 #define KVMPPC_H_UPDATE_DT      (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x3)
 /* 0x4 was used for KVMPPC_H_UPDATE_PHANDLE in SLOF */
 #define KVMPPC_H_VOF_CLIENT     (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x5)
-#define KVMPPC_HCALL_MAX        KVMPPC_H_VOF_CLIENT
+
+/* Platform-specific hcalls used for nested HV KVM */
+#define KVMPPC_H_SET_PARTITION_TABLE   (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x800)
+#define KVMPPC_H_ENTER_NESTED          (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x804)
+#define KVMPPC_H_TLB_INVALIDATE        (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x808)
+#define KVMPPC_H_COPY_TOFROM_GUEST     (KVMPPC_HCALL_BASE + 0x80C)
+
+#define KVMPPC_HCALL_MAX        KVMPPC_H_COPY_TOFROM_GUEST
 
 /*
  * The hcall range 0xEF00 to 0xEF80 is reserved for use in facilitating
@@ -589,6 +599,65 @@  struct SpaprMachineState {
 #define SVM_H_TPM_COMM              0xEF10
 #define SVM_HCALL_MAX               SVM_H_TPM_COMM
 
+/*
+ * Register state for entering a nested guest with H_ENTER_NESTED.
+ * New member must be added at the end.
+ */
+struct kvmppc_hv_guest_state {
+    uint64_t version;        /* version of this structure layout, must be first */
+    uint32_t lpid;
+    uint32_t vcpu_token;
+    /* These registers are hypervisor privileged (at least for writing) */
+    uint64_t lpcr;
+    uint64_t pcr;
+    uint64_t amor;
+    uint64_t dpdes;
+    uint64_t hfscr;
+    int64_t tb_offset;
+    uint64_t dawr0;
+    uint64_t dawrx0;
+    uint64_t ciabr;
+    uint64_t hdec_expiry;
+    uint64_t purr;
+    uint64_t spurr;
+    uint64_t ic;
+    uint64_t vtb;
+    uint64_t hdar;
+    uint64_t hdsisr;
+    uint64_t heir;
+    uint64_t asdr;
+    /* These are OS privileged but need to be set late in guest entry */
+    uint64_t srr0;
+    uint64_t srr1;
+    uint64_t sprg[4];
+    uint64_t pidr;
+    uint64_t cfar;
+    uint64_t ppr;
+    /* Version 1 ends here */
+    uint64_t dawr1;
+    uint64_t dawrx1;
+    /* Version 2 ends here */
+};
+
+/* Latest version of hv_guest_state structure */
+#define HV_GUEST_STATE_VERSION  2
+
+/* Linux 64-bit powerpc pt_regs struct, used by nested HV */
+struct kvmppc_pt_regs {
+    uint64_t gpr[32];
+    uint64_t nip;
+    uint64_t msr;
+    uint64_t orig_gpr3;    /* Used for restarting system calls */
+    uint64_t ctr;
+    uint64_t link;
+    uint64_t xer;
+    uint64_t ccr;
+    uint64_t softe;        /* Soft enabled/disabled */
+    uint64_t trap;         /* Reason for being here */
+    uint64_t dar;          /* Fault registers */
+    uint64_t dsisr;        /* on 4xx/Book-E used for ESR */
+    uint64_t result;       /* Result of a system call */
+};
 
 typedef struct SpaprDeviceTreeUpdateHeader {
     uint32_t version_id;
@@ -606,6 +675,9 @@  typedef target_ulong (*spapr_hcall_fn)(PowerPCCPU *cpu, SpaprMachineState *sm,
 void spapr_register_hypercall(target_ulong opcode, spapr_hcall_fn fn);
 target_ulong spapr_hypercall(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong opcode,
                              target_ulong *args);
+
+void spapr_exit_nested(PowerPCCPU *cpu, int excp);
+
 target_ulong softmmu_resize_hpt_prepare(PowerPCCPU *cpu, SpaprMachineState *spapr,
                                          target_ulong shift);
 target_ulong softmmu_resize_hpt_commit(PowerPCCPU *cpu, SpaprMachineState *spapr,
diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu.h b/target/ppc/cpu.h
index d8cc956c97..65c4401130 100644
--- a/target/ppc/cpu.h
+++ b/target/ppc/cpu.h
@@ -1301,6 +1301,9 @@  struct PowerPCCPU {
     bool pre_2_10_migration;
     bool pre_3_0_migration;
     int32_t mig_slb_nr;
+
+    bool in_spapr_nested;
+    CPUPPCState *nested_host_state;
 };