| Message ID | 20220412065753.3216538-3-robert.hu@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | acpi/nvdimm: support NVDIMM _LS{I,R,W} methods | expand |
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 14:57:53 +0800 Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com> wrote: > It should be some typo originally, where in If condition, using bitwise > and/or, rather than logical and/or. > > The resulting change in AML code: > > If (((Local6 == Zero) | (Arg0 != Local0))) > ==> > If (((Local6 == Zero) || (Arg0 != Local0))) > > If (((ObjectType (Arg3) == 0x04) & (SizeOf (Arg3) == One))) > ==> > If (((ObjectType (Arg3) == 0x04) && (SizeOf (Arg3) == One))) > > Fixes: 90623ebf603 ("nvdimm acpi: check UUID") > Fixes: 4568c948066 ("nvdimm acpi: save arg3 of _DSM method") > Signed-off-by: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com> > Reviewed-by: Jingqi Liu <jingqi.liu@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> > --- > hw/acpi/nvdimm.c | 7 +++---- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c > index 7cc419401b..2cd26bb9e9 100644 > --- a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c > +++ b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c > @@ -1040,7 +1040,7 @@ static void nvdimm_build_common_dsm(Aml *dev, > > uuid_invalid = aml_lnot(aml_equal(uuid, expected_uuid)); > > - unsupport = aml_if(aml_or(unpatched, uuid_invalid, NULL)); > + unsupport = aml_if(aml_lor(unpatched, uuid_invalid)); > > /* > * function 0 is called to inquire what functions are supported by > @@ -1072,10 +1072,9 @@ static void nvdimm_build_common_dsm(Aml *dev, > * in the DSM Spec. > */ > pckg = aml_arg(3); > - ifctx = aml_if(aml_and(aml_equal(aml_object_type(pckg), > + ifctx = aml_if(aml_land(aml_equal(aml_object_type(pckg), > aml_int(4 /* Package */)) /* It is a Package? */, > - aml_equal(aml_sizeof(pckg), aml_int(1)) /* 1 element? */, > - NULL)); > + aml_equal(aml_sizeof(pckg), aml_int(1)) /* 1 element? */)); > > pckg_index = aml_local(2); > pckg_buf = aml_local(3);
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 02:57:53PM +0800, Robert Hoo wrote: > It should be some typo originally, where in If condition, using bitwise > and/or, rather than logical and/or. > > The resulting change in AML code: > > If (((Local6 == Zero) | (Arg0 != Local0))) > ==> > If (((Local6 == Zero) || (Arg0 != Local0))) > > If (((ObjectType (Arg3) == 0x04) & (SizeOf (Arg3) == One))) > ==> > If (((ObjectType (Arg3) == 0x04) && (SizeOf (Arg3) == One))) > > Fixes: 90623ebf603 ("nvdimm acpi: check UUID") > Fixes: 4568c948066 ("nvdimm acpi: save arg3 of _DSM method") > Signed-off-by: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com> > Reviewed-by: Jingqi Liu <jingqi.liu@intel.com> This changes existing AML, you need to do the dance with updating bios test tables, see header of ./tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c > --- > hw/acpi/nvdimm.c | 7 +++---- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c > index 7cc419401b..2cd26bb9e9 100644 > --- a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c > +++ b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c > @@ -1040,7 +1040,7 @@ static void nvdimm_build_common_dsm(Aml *dev, > > uuid_invalid = aml_lnot(aml_equal(uuid, expected_uuid)); > > - unsupport = aml_if(aml_or(unpatched, uuid_invalid, NULL)); > + unsupport = aml_if(aml_lor(unpatched, uuid_invalid)); > > /* > * function 0 is called to inquire what functions are supported by > @@ -1072,10 +1072,9 @@ static void nvdimm_build_common_dsm(Aml *dev, > * in the DSM Spec. > */ > pckg = aml_arg(3); > - ifctx = aml_if(aml_and(aml_equal(aml_object_type(pckg), > + ifctx = aml_if(aml_land(aml_equal(aml_object_type(pckg), > aml_int(4 /* Package */)) /* It is a Package? */, > - aml_equal(aml_sizeof(pckg), aml_int(1)) /* 1 element? */, > - NULL)); > + aml_equal(aml_sizeof(pckg), aml_int(1)) /* 1 element? */)); > > pckg_index = aml_local(2); > pckg_buf = aml_local(3); > -- > 2.31.1
diff --git a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c index 7cc419401b..2cd26bb9e9 100644 --- a/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c +++ b/hw/acpi/nvdimm.c @@ -1040,7 +1040,7 @@ static void nvdimm_build_common_dsm(Aml *dev, uuid_invalid = aml_lnot(aml_equal(uuid, expected_uuid)); - unsupport = aml_if(aml_or(unpatched, uuid_invalid, NULL)); + unsupport = aml_if(aml_lor(unpatched, uuid_invalid)); /* * function 0 is called to inquire what functions are supported by @@ -1072,10 +1072,9 @@ static void nvdimm_build_common_dsm(Aml *dev, * in the DSM Spec. */ pckg = aml_arg(3); - ifctx = aml_if(aml_and(aml_equal(aml_object_type(pckg), + ifctx = aml_if(aml_land(aml_equal(aml_object_type(pckg), aml_int(4 /* Package */)) /* It is a Package? */, - aml_equal(aml_sizeof(pckg), aml_int(1)) /* 1 element? */, - NULL)); + aml_equal(aml_sizeof(pckg), aml_int(1)) /* 1 element? */)); pckg_index = aml_local(2); pckg_buf = aml_local(3);
It should be some typo originally, where in If condition, using bitwise and/or, rather than logical and/or. The resulting change in AML code: If (((Local6 == Zero) | (Arg0 != Local0))) ==> If (((Local6 == Zero) || (Arg0 != Local0))) If (((ObjectType (Arg3) == 0x04) & (SizeOf (Arg3) == One))) ==> If (((ObjectType (Arg3) == 0x04) && (SizeOf (Arg3) == One))) Fixes: 90623ebf603 ("nvdimm acpi: check UUID") Fixes: 4568c948066 ("nvdimm acpi: save arg3 of _DSM method") Signed-off-by: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jingqi Liu <jingqi.liu@intel.com> --- hw/acpi/nvdimm.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)