From patchwork Mon Jun 20 14:03:48 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Pierre Morel X-Patchwork-Id: 12887603 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3493DC43334 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:08:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52348 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o3I5I-00046I-B6 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 10:08:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40642) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o3HwR-0002vU-38; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 09:59:47 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:3088) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o3HwP-0005kD-1W; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 09:59:46 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25KDMImD005819; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 13:59:43 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=Iur1XtJOldKsIw2vepB5Gr/txk7H3Frv0yM5d5CqFPI=; b=R/C7aFfLpalg4PMFag5Tw6HM1z65JrWvVRyGY6AcIeChv/pQm0NgyIBPYtMgWgoZJgkH MjdimHYYjKlRs3muQVqSOFW6QlkjnbQ1AU0zhPJxoP2ssjbxuwpkgNUfyQlDuylvHUwg WzqnoWw2rgEg32aT3JpTGG6Fe3ajkPpKApJBX+ZhsS310ZIqZb1YrX8EptZAg/tfTEhy T+jNrVEU9brrYu4jENfYjw6KOO7uVHYTmxOXTF0x70XS+WEzOLDqJuo1zLD5ay1xSBLV taBAI1ktLeXmI6tLHMlv4q+oyfRfmNXIY+wSjxWL2G6zKKHIkWJbpkXUJ++bEM2KRX6P Yw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gsrrrjtv1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Jun 2022 13:59:43 +0000 Received: from m0127361.ppops.net (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25KClnFn026767; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 13:59:43 GMT Received: from ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (6a.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.106]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gsrrrjtuc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Jun 2022 13:59:42 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 25KDpPH8028001; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 13:59:41 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3gs6b8t223-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Jun 2022 13:59:41 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 25KDxcu418022688 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 20 Jun 2022 13:59:38 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05DF411C04A; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 13:59:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32BB811C052; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 13:59:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-c6ac47cc-293c-11b2-a85c-d421c8e4747b.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.171.62.140]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2022 13:59:37 +0000 (GMT) From: Pierre Morel To: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, ehabkost@redhat.com, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH v8 08/12] s390x/cpu_topology: implementing numa for the s390x topology Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 16:03:48 +0200 Message-Id: <20220620140352.39398-9-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20220620140352.39398-1-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220620140352.39398-1-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: yLKGMltHtriVm2qkvdAyUnJIVWP745-q X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 7-6mNzzf7hLZZYTS9X1lFNoktkucLr44 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.883,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-06-20_05,2022-06-17_01,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2206200063 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=148.163.158.5; envelope-from=pmorel@linux.ibm.com; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" S390x CPU Topology allows a non uniform repartition of the CPU inside the topology containers, sockets, books and drawers. We use numa to place the CPU inside the right topology container and report the non uniform topology to the guest. Note that s390x needs CPU0 to belong to the topology and consequently all topology must include CPU0. We accept a partial QEMU numa definition, in that case undefined CPUs are added to free slots in the topology starting with slot 0 and going up. Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel --- hw/core/machine.c | 18 ++++++++++ hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c index 4c5c8d1655..3bee66acc6 100644 --- a/hw/core/machine.c +++ b/hw/core/machine.c @@ -760,6 +760,16 @@ void machine_set_cpu_numa_node(MachineState *machine, return; } + if (props->has_book_id && !slot->props.has_book_id) { + error_setg(errp, "book-id is not supported"); + return; + } + + if (props->has_drawer_id && !slot->props.has_drawer_id) { + error_setg(errp, "drawer-id is not supported"); + return; + } + /* skip slots with explicit mismatch */ if (props->has_thread_id && props->thread_id != slot->props.thread_id) { continue; @@ -782,6 +792,14 @@ void machine_set_cpu_numa_node(MachineState *machine, continue; } + if (props->has_book_id && props->book_id != slot->props.book_id) { + continue; + } + + if (props->has_drawer_id && props->drawer_id != slot->props.drawer_id) { + continue; + } + /* reject assignment if slot is already assigned, for compatibility * of legacy cpu_index mapping with SPAPR core based mapping do not * error out if cpu thread and matched core have the same node-id */ diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c index 3b2a1f2729..5c0dbff6fd 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c @@ -85,14 +85,34 @@ out: static void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine) { MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine); - int i; + CPUArchId *slot; + int i, n = 0; /* initialize possible_cpus */ mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(machine); s390_topology_setup(machine); - for (i = 0; i < machine->smp.cpus; i++) { + + /* For NUMA configuration create defined nodes */ + if (machine->numa_state->num_nodes) { + for (i = 0; i < machine->smp.max_cpus; i++) { + slot = &machine->possible_cpus->cpus[i]; + if (slot->arch_id != -1 && n < machine->smp.cpus) { + s390x_new_cpu(machine->cpu_type, i, &error_fatal); + n++; + } + } + } + + /* create all remaining CPUs */ + for (i = 0; n < machine->smp.cpus && i < machine->smp.max_cpus; i++) { + slot = &machine->possible_cpus->cpus[i]; + /* For NUMA configuration skip defined nodes */ + if (machine->numa_state->num_nodes && slot->arch_id != -1) { + continue; + } s390x_new_cpu(machine->cpu_type, i, &error_fatal); + n++; } } @@ -275,6 +295,11 @@ static void ccw_init(MachineState *machine) /* register hypercalls */ virtio_ccw_register_hcalls(); + /* CPU0 must exist on S390x */ + if (!s390_cpu_addr2state(0)) { + error_printf("Core_id 0 must be defined in the CPU configuration\n"); + exit(1); + } s390_enable_css_support(s390_cpu_addr2state(0)); ret = css_create_css_image(VIRTUAL_CSSID, true); @@ -307,6 +332,7 @@ static void s390_cpu_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, g_assert(!ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].cpu); ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].cpu = OBJECT(dev); + ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].arch_id = cpu->env.core_id; if (!s390_topology_new_cpu(ms, cpu->env.core_id, errp)) { return; @@ -532,7 +558,9 @@ static CpuInstanceProperties s390_cpu_index_to_props(MachineState *ms, static const CPUArchIdList *s390_possible_cpu_arch_ids(MachineState *ms) { int i; + int drawer_id, book_id, socket_id; unsigned int max_cpus = ms->smp.max_cpus; + CPUArchId *slot; if (ms->possible_cpus) { g_assert(ms->possible_cpus && ms->possible_cpus->len == max_cpus); @@ -543,11 +571,25 @@ static const CPUArchIdList *s390_possible_cpu_arch_ids(MachineState *ms) sizeof(CPUArchId) * max_cpus); ms->possible_cpus->len = max_cpus; for (i = 0; i < ms->possible_cpus->len; i++) { - ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].type = ms->cpu_type; - ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].vcpus_count = 1; - ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].arch_id = i; - ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].props.has_core_id = true; - ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].props.core_id = i; + slot = &ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i]; + + slot->type = ms->cpu_type; + slot->vcpus_count = 1; + slot->arch_id = i; + slot->props.has_core_id = true; + slot->props.core_id = i; + + socket_id = i / ms->smp.cores; + slot->props.socket_id = socket_id; + slot->props.has_socket_id = true; + + book_id = socket_id / ms->smp.sockets; + slot->props.book_id = book_id; + slot->props.has_book_id = true; + + drawer_id = book_id / ms->smp.books; + slot->props.drawer_id = drawer_id; + slot->props.has_drawer_id = true; } return ms->possible_cpus; @@ -589,6 +631,17 @@ static ram_addr_t s390_fixup_ram_size(ram_addr_t sz) return newsz; } +/* + * S390 defines CPU topology level 2 as the level for which a change in topology + * is worth being taking care of. + * Let use level 2, socket, as the numa node. + */ +static int64_t s390_get_default_cpu_node_id(const MachineState *ms, int idx) +{ + ms->possible_cpus->cpus[idx].arch_id = -1; + return idx / ms->smp.cores; +} + static void ccw_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) { MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc); @@ -621,6 +674,7 @@ static void ccw_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) mc->default_ram_id = "s390.ram"; mc->smp_props.books_supported = true; mc->smp_props.drawers_supported = true; + mc->get_default_cpu_node_id = s390_get_default_cpu_node_id; } static inline bool machine_get_aes_key_wrap(Object *obj, Error **errp)