Message ID | 20220711185640.3558813-3-iii@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | accel/tcg: Fix unaligned stores to s390x low-address-protected lowcore | expand |
On 7/12/22 00:26, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > System tests on x86 use isa-debug-exit device in order to signal > success or failure to the test runner. Unfortunately it's not easily > usable on other architectures, since a guest needs to access > address_space_io, which may not be as straightforward as on x86. > Also, it requires adding ISA bus, which an architecture might not > otherwise need. > > Introduce mmio-debug-exit device, which has the same semantics, but is > triggered by writes to memory. > > Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> You shouldn't need this for s390x, as there are already (at least) two other paths to qemu_system_shutdown_request. E.g. SIGP, which has a stop option. r~
On Tue, 2022-07-12 at 10:42 +0530, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 7/12/22 00:26, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > > System tests on x86 use isa-debug-exit device in order to signal > > success or failure to the test runner. Unfortunately it's not > > easily > > usable on other architectures, since a guest needs to access > > address_space_io, which may not be as straightforward as on x86. > > Also, it requires adding ISA bus, which an architecture might not > > otherwise need. > > > > Introduce mmio-debug-exit device, which has the same semantics, but > > is > > triggered by writes to memory. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> > > You shouldn't need this for s390x, as there are already (at least) > two other paths to > qemu_system_shutdown_request. > > E.g. SIGP, which has a stop option. > > > r~ > I would normally use lpswe + disabled wait, but this always gives me exit status code 0, which doesn't allow easily distinguishing between success and failure. Code-wise SIGP seems to do roughly the same thing, and a quick experiment with: lgfi %r4,-1 lgfi %r5,-1 larl %r6,_cpuaddr stap 0(%r6) lh %r6,0(%r6) nilh %r6,0 sigp %r4,%r6,5 _cpuaddr: .short 0 confirmed that we get exit status code 0 as well. Best regards, Ilya
On 12.07.22 11:52, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > On Tue, 2022-07-12 at 10:42 +0530, Richard Henderson wrote: >> On 7/12/22 00:26, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: >>> System tests on x86 use isa-debug-exit device in order to signal >>> success or failure to the test runner. Unfortunately it's not >>> easily >>> usable on other architectures, since a guest needs to access >>> address_space_io, which may not be as straightforward as on x86. >>> Also, it requires adding ISA bus, which an architecture might not >>> otherwise need. >>> >>> Introduce mmio-debug-exit device, which has the same semantics, but >>> is >>> triggered by writes to memory. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> >> >> You shouldn't need this for s390x, as there are already (at least) >> two other paths to >> qemu_system_shutdown_request. >> >> E.g. SIGP, which has a stop option. >> >> >> r~ >> > > I would normally use lpswe + disabled wait, but this always gives me > exit status code 0, which doesn't allow easily distinguishing between > success and failure. > > Code-wise SIGP seems to do roughly the same thing, and a quick > experiment with: > > lgfi %r4,-1 > lgfi %r5,-1 > larl %r6,_cpuaddr > stap 0(%r6) > lh %r6,0(%r6) > nilh %r6,0 > sigp %r4,%r6,5 > _cpuaddr: .short 0 > > confirmed that we get exit status code 0 as well. disabled wait should trigger a qemu_system_guest_panicked(). But "panic_action == PANIC_ACTION_SHUTDOWN" seems to only make qemu_main_loop() return with main_loop_should_exit() == true. main/qemu_main will always return 0. We could return != 0 on guest panic, but not sure if that could break existing scripts. We'd need a new QEMU toggle for that most probably ...
On 12.07.22 11:52, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > On Tue, 2022-07-12 at 10:42 +0530, Richard Henderson wrote: >> On 7/12/22 00:26, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: >>> System tests on x86 use isa-debug-exit device in order to signal >>> success or failure to the test runner. Unfortunately it's not >>> easily >>> usable on other architectures, since a guest needs to access >>> address_space_io, which may not be as straightforward as on x86. >>> Also, it requires adding ISA bus, which an architecture might not >>> otherwise need. >>> >>> Introduce mmio-debug-exit device, which has the same semantics, but >>> is >>> triggered by writes to memory. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> >> >> You shouldn't need this for s390x, as there are already (at least) >> two other paths to >> qemu_system_shutdown_request. >> >> E.g. SIGP, which has a stop option. >> >> >> r~ >> > > I would normally use lpswe + disabled wait, but this always gives me > exit status code 0, which doesn't allow easily distinguishing between > success and failure. > > Code-wise SIGP seems to do roughly the same thing, and a quick > experiment with: > > lgfi %r4,-1 > lgfi %r5,-1 > larl %r6,_cpuaddr > stap 0(%r6) > lh %r6,0(%r6) > nilh %r6,0 > sigp %r4,%r6,5 > _cpuaddr: .short 0 > > confirmed that we get exit status code 0 as well. disabled wait should trigger a qemu_system_guest_panicked(). But "panic_action == PANIC_ACTION_SHUTDOWN" seems to only make qemu_main_loop() return with main_loop_should_exit() == true. main/qemu_main will always return 0. We could return != 0 on guest panic, but not sure if that could break existing scripts. We'd need a new QEMU toggle for that most probably ...
On Tue, 2022-07-12 at 12:08 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 12.07.22 11:52, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-07-12 at 10:42 +0530, Richard Henderson wrote: > > > On 7/12/22 00:26, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > > > > System tests on x86 use isa-debug-exit device in order to > > > > signal > > > > success or failure to the test runner. Unfortunately it's not > > > > easily > > > > usable on other architectures, since a guest needs to access > > > > address_space_io, which may not be as straightforward as on > > > > x86. > > > > Also, it requires adding ISA bus, which an architecture might > > > > not > > > > otherwise need. > > > > > > > > Introduce mmio-debug-exit device, which has the same semantics, > > > > but > > > > is > > > > triggered by writes to memory. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> > > > > > > You shouldn't need this for s390x, as there are already (at > > > least) > > > two other paths to > > > qemu_system_shutdown_request. > > > > > > E.g. SIGP, which has a stop option. > > > > > > > > > r~ > > > > > > > I would normally use lpswe + disabled wait, but this always gives > > me > > exit status code 0, which doesn't allow easily distinguishing > > between > > success and failure. > > > > Code-wise SIGP seems to do roughly the same thing, and a quick > > experiment with: > > > > lgfi %r4,-1 > > lgfi %r5,-1 > > larl %r6,_cpuaddr > > stap 0(%r6) > > lh %r6,0(%r6) > > nilh %r6,0 > > sigp %r4,%r6,5 > > _cpuaddr: .short 0 > > > > confirmed that we get exit status code 0 as well. > > disabled wait should trigger a qemu_system_guest_panicked(). > > But "panic_action == PANIC_ACTION_SHUTDOWN" seems to only make > qemu_main_loop() return with main_loop_should_exit() == true. > > main/qemu_main will always return 0. > > We could return != 0 on guest panic, but not sure if that could break > existing scripts. We'd need a new QEMU toggle for that most probably > ... > I wonder if a device is a cleaner way to solve this? It may be used on all architectures, so there is no need to invent per-architecture way to exit with a specific code. Maybe we can even replace Intel's debugexit with it.
diff --git a/hw/misc/Kconfig b/hw/misc/Kconfig index cbabe9f78c..0f12735ef7 100644 --- a/hw/misc/Kconfig +++ b/hw/misc/Kconfig @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ config ISA_DEBUG bool depends on ISA_BUS +config MMIO_DEBUGEXIT + bool + config SGA bool depends on ISA_BUS diff --git a/hw/misc/debugexit_mmio.c b/hw/misc/debugexit_mmio.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..5e823cc01c --- /dev/null +++ b/hw/misc/debugexit_mmio.c @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ +/* + * Exit with status X when the guest writes X (little-endian) to a specified + * address. For testing purposes only. + * + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later + */ + +#include "qemu/osdep.h" +#include "exec/address-spaces.h" +#include "exec/memory.h" +#include "hw/qdev-core.h" +#include "hw/qdev-properties.h" + +#define TYPE_MMIO_DEBUG_EXIT_DEVICE "mmio-debug-exit" +OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(MMIODebugExitState, MMIO_DEBUG_EXIT_DEVICE) + +struct MMIODebugExitState { + DeviceState parent_obj; + + uint32_t base; + uint32_t size; + MemoryRegion region; +}; + +static uint64_t mmio_debug_exit_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned size) +{ + return 0; +} + +static void mmio_debug_exit_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t val, + unsigned width) +{ + exit(val); +} + +static const MemoryRegionOps mmio_debug_exit_ops = { + .read = mmio_debug_exit_read, + .write = mmio_debug_exit_write, + .valid.min_access_size = 1, + .valid.max_access_size = 8, + .endianness = DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN, +}; + +static void mmio_debug_exit_realizefn(DeviceState *d, Error **errp) +{ + MMIODebugExitState *s = MMIO_DEBUG_EXIT_DEVICE(d); + + memory_region_init_io(&s->region, OBJECT(s), &mmio_debug_exit_ops, s, + TYPE_MMIO_DEBUG_EXIT_DEVICE, s->size); + memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), s->base, &s->region); +} + +static Property mmio_debug_exit_properties[] = { + DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("base", MMIODebugExitState, base, 0), + DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("size", MMIODebugExitState, size, 1), + DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(), +}; + +static void mmio_debug_exit_class_initfn(ObjectClass *klass, void *data) +{ + DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass); + + dc->realize = mmio_debug_exit_realizefn; + device_class_set_props(dc, mmio_debug_exit_properties); + set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_MISC, dc->categories); +} + +static const TypeInfo mmio_debug_exit_info = { + .name = TYPE_MMIO_DEBUG_EXIT_DEVICE, + .parent = TYPE_DEVICE, + .instance_size = sizeof(MMIODebugExitState), + .class_init = mmio_debug_exit_class_initfn, +}; + +static void mmio_debug_exit_register_types(void) +{ + type_register_static(&mmio_debug_exit_info); +} + +type_init(mmio_debug_exit_register_types) diff --git a/hw/misc/meson.build b/hw/misc/meson.build index 95268eddc0..1d2a1067dc 100644 --- a/hw/misc/meson.build +++ b/hw/misc/meson.build @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_APPLESMC', if_true: files('applesmc.c')) softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_EDU', if_true: files('edu.c')) softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_FW_CFG_DMA', if_true: files('vmcoreinfo.c')) softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_ISA_DEBUG', if_true: files('debugexit.c')) +softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_MMIO_DEBUGEXIT', if_true: files('debugexit_mmio.c')) softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_ISA_TESTDEV', if_true: files('pc-testdev.c')) softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_PCA9552', if_true: files('pca9552.c')) softmmu_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_PCI_TESTDEV', if_true: files('pci-testdev.c')) diff --git a/hw/s390x/Kconfig b/hw/s390x/Kconfig index 5e7d8a2bae..9223715dcc 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/Kconfig +++ b/hw/s390x/Kconfig @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ config S390_CCW_VIRTIO imply VFIO_AP imply VFIO_CCW imply WDT_DIAG288 + imply MMIO_DEBUGEXIT select PCI select S390_FLIC select SCLPCONSOLE
System tests on x86 use isa-debug-exit device in order to signal success or failure to the test runner. Unfortunately it's not easily usable on other architectures, since a guest needs to access address_space_io, which may not be as straightforward as on x86. Also, it requires adding ISA bus, which an architecture might not otherwise need. Introduce mmio-debug-exit device, which has the same semantics, but is triggered by writes to memory. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> --- hw/misc/Kconfig | 3 ++ hw/misc/debugexit_mmio.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/misc/meson.build | 1 + hw/s390x/Kconfig | 1 + 4 files changed, 85 insertions(+) create mode 100644 hw/misc/debugexit_mmio.c