| Message ID | 20220824155113.286730-3-jean-philippe@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | hw/arm/virt: Fix dt-schema warnings | expand |
On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 16:51, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote: > > dt-validate warns that an implementation compatible with arm,psci-1.0 > shouldn't have arm,psci in their compatible string. > > psci: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: > ['arm,psci-1.0', 'arm,psci-0.2', 'arm,psci'] is too long > From schema: linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> > --- > hw/arm/boot.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/arm/boot.c b/hw/arm/boot.c > index ada2717f76..527918227e 100644 > --- a/hw/arm/boot.c > +++ b/hw/arm/boot.c > @@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ static void fdt_add_psci_node(void *fdt) > const char comp[] = "arm,psci-0.2\0arm,psci"; > qemu_fdt_setprop(fdt, "/psci", "compatible", comp, sizeof(comp)); > } else { > - const char comp[] = "arm,psci-1.0\0arm,psci-0.2\0arm,psci"; > + const char comp[] = "arm,psci-1.0\0arm,psci-0.2"; > qemu_fdt_setprop(fdt, "/psci", "compatible", comp, sizeof(comp)); > } This doesn't look right. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml says "arm,psci-1.0" means "complies to PSCI 1.0", "arm,psci-0.2" means "complies to PSCI 0.2", and "arm,psci" means "complies to pre-0.2 PSCI" If you want to drop "arm,psci" then you should be arguing why we're not compliant with pre-0.2 PSCI. Maybe we aren't and we shouldn't be advertising it, but you need more rationale than "dt-validate complained". thanks -- PMM
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 08:33:54PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 16:51, Jean-Philippe Brucker > <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > dt-validate warns that an implementation compatible with arm,psci-1.0 > > shouldn't have arm,psci in their compatible string. > > > > psci: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: > > ['arm,psci-1.0', 'arm,psci-0.2', 'arm,psci'] is too long > > From schema: linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> > > --- > > hw/arm/boot.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/arm/boot.c b/hw/arm/boot.c > > index ada2717f76..527918227e 100644 > > --- a/hw/arm/boot.c > > +++ b/hw/arm/boot.c > > @@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ static void fdt_add_psci_node(void *fdt) > > const char comp[] = "arm,psci-0.2\0arm,psci"; > > qemu_fdt_setprop(fdt, "/psci", "compatible", comp, sizeof(comp)); > > } else { > > - const char comp[] = "arm,psci-1.0\0arm,psci-0.2\0arm,psci"; > > + const char comp[] = "arm,psci-1.0\0arm,psci-0.2"; > > qemu_fdt_setprop(fdt, "/psci", "compatible", comp, sizeof(comp)); > > } > > This doesn't look right. > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml says > "arm,psci-1.0" means "complies to PSCI 1.0", > "arm,psci-0.2" means "complies to PSCI 0.2", > and "arm,psci" means "complies to pre-0.2 PSCI" > > If you want to drop "arm,psci" then you should be arguing why > we're not compliant with pre-0.2 PSCI. Maybe we aren't and we > shouldn't be advertising it, but you need more rationale than > "dt-validate complained". Yes I agree, and that's my mistake. Rob already relaxed the bindings https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220803201639.2552581-1-robh@kernel.org/ but that's queued for v6.1 and I was validating against mainline. I'll drop the patch Thanks, Jean
diff --git a/hw/arm/boot.c b/hw/arm/boot.c index ada2717f76..527918227e 100644 --- a/hw/arm/boot.c +++ b/hw/arm/boot.c @@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ static void fdt_add_psci_node(void *fdt) const char comp[] = "arm,psci-0.2\0arm,psci"; qemu_fdt_setprop(fdt, "/psci", "compatible", comp, sizeof(comp)); } else { - const char comp[] = "arm,psci-1.0\0arm,psci-0.2\0arm,psci"; + const char comp[] = "arm,psci-1.0\0arm,psci-0.2"; qemu_fdt_setprop(fdt, "/psci", "compatible", comp, sizeof(comp)); }
dt-validate warns that an implementation compatible with arm,psci-1.0 shouldn't have arm,psci in their compatible string. psci: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: ['arm,psci-1.0', 'arm,psci-0.2', 'arm,psci'] is too long From schema: linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> --- hw/arm/boot.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)