diff mbox series

[v2] hw/mem/nvdimm: fix error message for 'unarmed' flag

Message ID 20221023195812.15523-1-jusual@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v2] hw/mem/nvdimm: fix error message for 'unarmed' flag | expand

Commit Message

Julia Suvorova Oct. 23, 2022, 7:58 p.m. UTC
In the ACPI specification [1], the 'unarmed' bit is set when a device
cannot accept a persistent write. This means that when a memdev is
read-only, the 'unarmed' flag must be turned on. The logic is correct,
just changing the error message.

[1] ACPI NFIT NVDIMM Region Mapping Structure "NVDIMM State Flags" Bit 3

Fixes: dbd730e859 ("nvdimm: check -object memory-backend-file, readonly=on option")
Signed-off-by: Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
v2:
    * enquote 'on' [Philippe]

 hw/mem/nvdimm.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

David Hildenbrand Oct. 24, 2022, 10:54 a.m. UTC | #1
On 23.10.22 21:58, Julia Suvorova wrote:
> In the ACPI specification [1], the 'unarmed' bit is set when a device
> cannot accept a persistent write. This means that when a memdev is
> read-only, the 'unarmed' flag must be turned on. The logic is correct,
> just changing the error message.
> 
> [1] ACPI NFIT NVDIMM Region Mapping Structure "NVDIMM State Flags" Bit 3
> 
> Fixes: dbd730e859 ("nvdimm: check -object memory-backend-file, readonly=on option")
> Signed-off-by: Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
> v2:
>      * enquote 'on' [Philippe]
> 
>   hw/mem/nvdimm.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/mem/nvdimm.c b/hw/mem/nvdimm.c
> index 7c7d777781..31080c22c9 100644
> --- a/hw/mem/nvdimm.c
> +++ b/hw/mem/nvdimm.c
> @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static void nvdimm_prepare_memory_region(NVDIMMDevice *nvdimm, Error **errp)
>       if (!nvdimm->unarmed && memory_region_is_rom(mr)) {
>           HostMemoryBackend *hostmem = dimm->hostmem;
>   
> -        error_setg(errp, "'unarmed' property must be off since memdev %s "
> +        error_setg(errp, "'unarmed' property must be 'on' since memdev %s "
>                      "is read-only",
>                      object_get_canonical_path_component(OBJECT(hostmem)));
>           return;


Thanks, queued to

https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/qemu.git mem-next
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/hw/mem/nvdimm.c b/hw/mem/nvdimm.c
index 7c7d777781..31080c22c9 100644
--- a/hw/mem/nvdimm.c
+++ b/hw/mem/nvdimm.c
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@  static void nvdimm_prepare_memory_region(NVDIMMDevice *nvdimm, Error **errp)
     if (!nvdimm->unarmed && memory_region_is_rom(mr)) {
         HostMemoryBackend *hostmem = dimm->hostmem;
 
-        error_setg(errp, "'unarmed' property must be off since memdev %s "
+        error_setg(errp, "'unarmed' property must be 'on' since memdev %s "
                    "is read-only",
                    object_get_canonical_path_component(OBJECT(hostmem)));
         return;