@@ -608,13 +608,16 @@ static int nbd_parse_offset_hole_payload(BDRVNBDState *s,
*/
static int nbd_parse_blockstatus_payload(BDRVNBDState *s,
NBDStructuredReplyChunk *chunk,
- uint8_t *payload, uint64_t orig_length,
- NBDExtent *extent, Error **errp)
+ uint8_t *payload, bool wide,
+ uint64_t orig_length,
+ NBDExtentExt *extent, Error **errp)
{
uint32_t context_id;
+ uint32_t count = 0;
+ size_t len = wide ? sizeof(*extent) : sizeof(NBDExtent);
/* The server succeeded, so it must have sent [at least] one extent */
- if (chunk->length < sizeof(context_id) + sizeof(*extent)) {
+ if (chunk->length < sizeof(context_id) + wide * sizeof(count) + len) {
error_setg(errp, "Protocol error: invalid payload for "
"NBD_REPLY_TYPE_BLOCK_STATUS");
return -EINVAL;
@@ -629,8 +632,14 @@ static int nbd_parse_blockstatus_payload(BDRVNBDState *s,
return -EINVAL;
}
- extent->length = payload_advance32(&payload);
- extent->flags = payload_advance32(&payload);
+ if (wide) {
+ count = payload_advance32(&payload);
+ extent->length = payload_advance64(&payload);
+ extent->flags = payload_advance64(&payload);
+ } else {
+ extent->length = payload_advance32(&payload);
+ extent->flags = payload_advance32(&payload);
+ }
if (extent->length == 0) {
error_setg(errp, "Protocol error: server sent status chunk with "
@@ -670,7 +679,8 @@ static int nbd_parse_blockstatus_payload(BDRVNBDState *s,
* connection; just ignore trailing extents, and clamp things to
* the length of our request.
*/
- if (chunk->length > sizeof(context_id) + sizeof(*extent)) {
+ if (count > 1 ||
+ chunk->length > sizeof(context_id) + wide * sizeof(count) + len) {
trace_nbd_parse_blockstatus_compliance("more than one extent");
}
if (extent->length > orig_length) {
@@ -1114,7 +1124,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn nbd_co_receive_cmdread_reply(BDRVNBDState *s, uint64_t h
static int coroutine_fn nbd_co_receive_blockstatus_reply(BDRVNBDState *s,
uint64_t handle, uint64_t length,
- NBDExtent *extent,
+ NBDExtentExt *extent,
int *request_ret, Error **errp)
{
NBDReplyChunkIter iter;
@@ -1131,6 +1141,11 @@ static int coroutine_fn nbd_co_receive_blockstatus_reply(BDRVNBDState *s,
assert(nbd_reply_is_structured(&reply));
switch (chunk->type) {
+ case NBD_REPLY_TYPE_BLOCK_STATUS_EXT:
+ if (!s->info.extended_headers) {
+ trace_nbd_extended_headers_compliance("block_status_ext");
+ }
+ /* fallthrough */
case NBD_REPLY_TYPE_BLOCK_STATUS:
if (received) {
nbd_channel_error(s, -EINVAL);
@@ -1139,9 +1154,10 @@ static int coroutine_fn nbd_co_receive_blockstatus_reply(BDRVNBDState *s,
}
received = true;
- ret = nbd_parse_blockstatus_payload(s, &reply.structured,
- payload, length, extent,
- &local_err);
+ ret = nbd_parse_blockstatus_payload(
+ s, &reply.structured, payload,
+ chunk->type == NBD_REPLY_TYPE_BLOCK_STATUS_EXT,
+ length, extent, &local_err);
if (ret < 0) {
nbd_channel_error(s, ret);
nbd_iter_channel_error(&iter, ret, &local_err);
@@ -1369,7 +1385,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn nbd_client_co_block_status(
int64_t *pnum, int64_t *map, BlockDriverState **file)
{
int ret, request_ret;
- NBDExtent extent = { 0 };
+ NBDExtentExt extent = { 0 };
BDRVNBDState *s = (BDRVNBDState *)bs->opaque;
Error *local_err = NULL;
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ iscsi_xcopy(void *src_lun, uint64_t src_off, void *dst_lun, uint64_t dst_off, ui
# nbd.c
nbd_parse_blockstatus_compliance(const char *err) "ignoring extra data from non-compliant server: %s"
nbd_structured_read_compliance(const char *type) "server sent non-compliant unaligned read %s chunk"
+nbd_extended_headers_compliance(const char *type) "server sent non-compliant %s chunk without extended headers"
nbd_read_reply_entry_fail(int ret, const char *err) "ret = %d, err: %s"
nbd_co_request_fail(uint64_t from, uint32_t len, uint64_t handle, uint16_t flags, uint16_t type, const char *name, int ret, const char *err) "Request failed { .from = %" PRIu64", .len = %" PRIu32 ", .handle = %" PRIu64 ", .flags = 0x%" PRIx16 ", .type = %" PRIu16 " (%s) } ret = %d, err: %s"
nbd_client_handshake(const char *export_name) "export '%s'"
Because we use NBD_CMD_FLAG_REQ_ONE with NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS, a client in narrow mode should not be able to provoke a server into sending a block status result larger than the client's 32-bit request. But in extended mode, a 64-bit status request must be able to handle a 64-bit status result, once a future patch enables the client requesting extended mode. We can also tolerate a non-compliant server sending the new chunk even when it should not. In normal execution, we are only requesting "base:allocation" which never exceeds 32 bits. But during testing with x-dirty-bitmap, we can force qemu to connect to some other context that might have 64-bit status bit; however, we ignore those upper bits (other than mapping qemu:allocation-depth into something that 'qemu-img map --output=json' can expose), and since it is only testing, we really don't bother with checking whether more than the two least-significant bits are set. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> --- block/nbd.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- block/trace-events | 1 + 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)