From patchwork Wed Feb 1 13:20:46 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Pierre Morel X-Patchwork-Id: 13124289 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C8E0C636D3 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 13:30:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pND4v-0007BW-UA; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 08:23:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pND3H-00063e-8E; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 08:21:30 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pND3C-000467-FW; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 08:21:25 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 311Ctj1V030275; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 13:21:12 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=0rQpBWnSCSg+hTCpttVtfiOSflMJCbv1cXL8T/yBGQQ=; b=ak53fYxXSNZLvnsr2TrNmICxht2b4muywYB6GMGhnY9fRlYEUKyZtOcnZ7r/EjWCk3Ez dzeAEdkjzq8A0xaxnjY1FgnfEN9qxBvCV5pdv+2zH+Qz0tQyzktXo/efZqSqjFmgaavE w48eL+D+uLeSOqqNPuj8HCqbJg2RuZ6RdPTRzxf1QnAEdefTmk1CnXM2wx9GLdIbp/Gf /lzyabhgolsnvxWpNTSHAZsoMV4v7xQekUMFgrFr3TJmwTpCsO2qGe0l9qF6t5C5b4Hk 9HdqdyhUq+tnFxLLZHrxZ8uhpENpcK1e3tc8l3wLVCfjxO1NqAjq7+5E6LTf8EVuqQkY IQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3nfrh3grnr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 01 Feb 2023 13:21:11 +0000 Received: from m0098409.ppops.net (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 311CujbN003850; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 13:21:11 GMT Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3nfrh3grm9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 01 Feb 2023 13:21:11 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 3116ieXO014744; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 13:21:08 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.225]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ncvttvvw8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 01 Feb 2023 13:21:08 +0000 Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.106]) by smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 311DL4lo44302624 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 1 Feb 2023 13:21:05 GMT Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF42D2004B; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 13:21:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C7220040; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 13:21:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-c6ac47cc-293c-11b2-a85c-d421c8e4747b.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.179.4.198]) by smtpav07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 13:21:03 +0000 (GMT) From: Pierre Morel To: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, ehabkost@redhat.com, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com, nsg@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com, clg@kaod.org Subject: [PATCH v15 06/11] s390x/cpu topology: interception of PTF instruction Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:20:46 +0100 Message-Id: <20230201132051.126868-7-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20230201132051.126868-1-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> References: <20230201132051.126868-1-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: bxH3NQmoaBKQ-m6YCkbZHWIK7Zmnr86i X-Proofpoint-GUID: swzgAWBcr_vMJg3TubiYflSJI92SJi-n X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.930,Hydra:6.0.562,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2023-02-01_04,2023-01-31_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2302010112 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=148.163.156.1; envelope-from=pmorel@linux.ibm.com; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org When the host supports the CPU topology facility, the PTF instruction with function code 2 is interpreted by the SIE, provided that the userland hypervizor activates the interpretation by using the KVM_CAP_S390_CPU_TOPOLOGY KVM extension. The PTF instructions with function code 0 and 1 are intercepted and must be emulated by the userland hypervizor. During RESET all CPU of the configuration are placed in horizontal polarity. Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel --- include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h | 6 ++ target/s390x/cpu.h | 1 + hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ target/s390x/cpu-sysemu.c | 14 ++++ target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c | 11 +++ 5 files changed, 135 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h b/include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h index 9bba21a916..c1d46e78af 100644 --- a/include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h +++ b/include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h @@ -30,6 +30,12 @@ struct S390CcwMachineState { uint8_t loadparm[8]; }; +#define S390_PTF_REASON_NONE (0x00 << 8) +#define S390_PTF_REASON_DONE (0x01 << 8) +#define S390_PTF_REASON_BUSY (0x02 << 8) +#define S390_TOPO_FC_MASK 0xffUL +void s390_handle_ptf(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uintptr_t ra); + struct S390CcwMachineClass { /*< private >*/ MachineClass parent_class; diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h index 848314d2a9..f6e207afde 100644 --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h @@ -857,6 +857,7 @@ void s390_enable_css_support(S390CPU *cpu); void s390_do_cpu_set_diag318(CPUState *cs, run_on_cpu_data arg); int s390_assign_subch_ioeventfd(EventNotifier *notifier, uint32_t sch_id, int vq, bool assign); +void s390_cpu_topology_set_modified(void); #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY unsigned int s390_cpu_set_state(uint8_t cpu_state, S390CPU *cpu); #else diff --git a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c index cf63f3dd01..1028bf4476 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c +++ b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c @@ -85,16 +85,104 @@ static void s390_topology_init(MachineState *ms) QTAILQ_INSERT_HEAD(&s390_topology.list, entry, next); } +/** + * s390_topology_set_cpus_polarity: + * @polarity: polarity requested by the caller + * + * Set all CPU entitlement according to polarity and + * dedication. + * Default vertical entitlement is POLARITY_VERTICAL_MEDIUM as + * it does not require host modification of the CPU provisioning + * until the host decide to modify individual CPU provisioning + * using QAPI interface. + * However a dedicated vCPU will have a POLARITY_VERTICAL_HIGH + * entitlement. + */ +static void s390_topology_set_cpus_polarity(int polarity) +{ + CPUState *cs; + + CPU_FOREACH(cs) { + if (polarity == POLARITY_HORIZONTAL) { + S390_CPU(cs)->env.entitlement = 0; + } else if (S390_CPU(cs)->env.dedicated) { + S390_CPU(cs)->env.entitlement = POLARITY_VERTICAL_HIGH; + } else { + S390_CPU(cs)->env.entitlement = POLARITY_VERTICAL_MEDIUM; + } + } +} + +/* + * s390_handle_ptf: + * + * @register 1: contains the function code + * + * Function codes 0 (horizontal) and 1 (vertical) define the CPU + * polarization requested by the guest. + * + * Verify that the polarization really need to change and call + * s390_topology_set_cpus_polarity() specifying the requested polarity + * to set for all CPUs. + * + * Function code 2 is handling topology changes and is interpreted + * by the SIE. + */ +void s390_handle_ptf(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uintptr_t ra) +{ + CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env; + uint64_t reg = env->regs[r1]; + int fc = reg & S390_TOPO_FC_MASK; + + if (!s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_CONFIGURATION_TOPOLOGY)) { + s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_OPERATION, ra); + return; + } + + if (env->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) { + s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_PRIVILEGED, ra); + return; + } + + if (reg & ~S390_TOPO_FC_MASK) { + s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra); + return; + } + + switch (fc) { + case POLARITY_VERTICAL: + case POLARITY_HORIZONTAL: + if (s390_topology.polarity == fc) { + env->regs[r1] |= S390_PTF_REASON_DONE; + setcc(cpu, 2); + } else { + s390_topology.polarity = fc; + s390_cpu_topology_set_modified(); + s390_topology_set_cpus_polarity(fc); + setcc(cpu, 0); + } + break; + default: + /* Note that fc == 2 is interpreted by the SIE */ + s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra); + } +} + /** * s390_topology_reset: * * Generic reset for CPU topology, calls s390_topology_reset() * s390_topology_reset() to reset the kernel Modified Topology * change record. + * Then set global and all CPUs polarity to POLARITY_HORIZONTAL. */ void s390_topology_reset(void) { s390_cpu_topology_reset(); + /* Set global polarity to POLARITY_HORIZONTAL */ + s390_topology.polarity = POLARITY_HORIZONTAL; + /* Set all CPU polarity to POLARITY_HORIZONTAL */ + s390_topology_set_cpus_polarity(POLARITY_HORIZONTAL); } /** @@ -137,6 +225,21 @@ static void s390_topology_cpu_default(S390CPU *cpu, Error **errp) (smp->books * smp->sockets * smp->cores)) % smp->drawers; } + + /* + * Machine polarity is set inside the global s390_topology structure. + * In the case the polarity is set as horizontal set the entitlement + * to POLARITY_VERTICAL_MEDIUM which is the better equivalent when + * machine polarity is set to vertical or POLARITY_VERTICAL_HIGH if + * the vCPU is dedicated. + */ + if (s390_topology.polarity && !env->entitlement) { + if (env->dedicated) { + env->entitlement = POLARITY_VERTICAL_HIGH; + } else { + env->entitlement = POLARITY_VERTICAL_MEDIUM; + } + } } /** diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu-sysemu.c b/target/s390x/cpu-sysemu.c index e27864c5f5..82e3f3891e 100644 --- a/target/s390x/cpu-sysemu.c +++ b/target/s390x/cpu-sysemu.c @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ #include "sysemu/sysemu.h" #include "sysemu/tcg.h" #include "hw/core/sysemu-cpu-ops.h" +#include "hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h" /* S390CPUClass::load_normal() */ static void s390_cpu_load_normal(CPUState *s) @@ -319,3 +320,16 @@ void s390_cpu_topology_reset(void) } } } + +void s390_cpu_topology_set_modified(void) +{ + int ret; + + if (kvm_enabled()) { + ret = kvm_s390_topology_set_mtcr(1); + if (ret) { + error_report("Failed to set Modified Topology Change Report: %s", + strerror(-ret)); + } + } +} diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c index bc953151ce..fb63be41b7 100644 --- a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c +++ b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ #define PRIV_B9_EQBS 0x9c #define PRIV_B9_CLP 0xa0 +#define PRIV_B9_PTF 0xa2 #define PRIV_B9_PCISTG 0xd0 #define PRIV_B9_PCILG 0xd2 #define PRIV_B9_RPCIT 0xd3 @@ -1464,6 +1465,13 @@ static int kvm_mpcifc_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run) } } +static void kvm_handle_ptf(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run) +{ + uint8_t r1 = (run->s390_sieic.ipb >> 20) & 0x0f; + + s390_handle_ptf(cpu, r1, RA_IGNORED); +} + static int handle_b9(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run, uint8_t ipa1) { int r = 0; @@ -1481,6 +1489,9 @@ static int handle_b9(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run, uint8_t ipa1) case PRIV_B9_RPCIT: r = kvm_rpcit_service_call(cpu, run); break; + case PRIV_B9_PTF: + kvm_handle_ptf(cpu, run); + break; case PRIV_B9_EQBS: /* just inject exception */ r = -1;