From patchwork Fri Feb 17 05:43:31 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jason Wang X-Patchwork-Id: 13144345 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94DDFC636D6 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 05:46:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pStXP-0000aT-Ka; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 00:44:03 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pStXO-0000Zn-Mq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 00:44:02 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pStXN-0001Np-0s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 00:44:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1676612639; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Vc+cpwghIdhzjJMh8b7ZSYwJLUU3TZcFB8a50pFS96E=; b=bm1W9bmHDYpaatW5jq5M+VSYxd8D43aZZC1kECjbBbtmZrdsekB9kPdJs60gAwsVNzQOPK nMd15MZHUQUdMBBu1k8vPC1nql1JVqyxD7nLYX8wpZ6RrHtHo2lFUBrM4nAcDauveYF9XR 5zMz5+qQi2BUilmV78y0eGHEotHiyQc= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-395-HyOghvsvMNa7Ja2h-9B3-A-1; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 00:43:55 -0500 X-MC-Unique: HyOghvsvMNa7Ja2h-9B3-A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 368E93C01E0D; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 05:43:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-12-47.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.47]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1104B492B15; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 05:43:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Jason Wang To: peter.maydell@linaro.org Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Fiona Ebner , Jason Wang Subject: [PULL V3 5/9] hw/net/vmxnet3: allow VMXNET3_MAX_MTU itself as a value Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:43:31 +0800 Message-Id: <20230217054335.57595-6-jasowang@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20230217054335.57595-1-jasowang@redhat.com> References: <20230217054335.57595-1-jasowang@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.10 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=jasowang@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org From: Fiona Ebner Currently, VMXNET3_MAX_MTU itself (being 9000) is not considered a valid value for the MTU, but a guest running ESXi 7.0 might try to set it and fail the assert [0]. In the Linux kernel, dev->max_mtu itself is a valid value for the MTU and for the vmxnet3 driver it's 9000, so a guest running Linux will also fail the assert when trying to set an MTU of 9000. VMXNET3_MAX_MTU and s->mtu don't seem to be used in relation to buffer allocations/accesses, so allowing the upper limit itself as a value should be fine. [0]: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/114011/ Fixes: d05dcd94ae ("net: vmxnet3: validate configuration values during activate (CVE-2021-20203)") Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner Signed-off-by: Jason Wang --- hw/net/vmxnet3.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/net/vmxnet3.c b/hw/net/vmxnet3.c index d2ab527..56559cd 100644 --- a/hw/net/vmxnet3.c +++ b/hw/net/vmxnet3.c @@ -1441,7 +1441,7 @@ static void vmxnet3_activate_device(VMXNET3State *s) vmxnet3_setup_rx_filtering(s); /* Cache fields from shared memory */ s->mtu = VMXNET3_READ_DRV_SHARED32(d, s->drv_shmem, devRead.misc.mtu); - assert(VMXNET3_MIN_MTU <= s->mtu && s->mtu < VMXNET3_MAX_MTU); + assert(VMXNET3_MIN_MTU <= s->mtu && s->mtu <= VMXNET3_MAX_MTU); VMW_CFPRN("MTU is %u", s->mtu); s->max_rx_frags =