@@ -431,16 +431,6 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_init(struct vhost_dev *dev, void *opaque, Error **errp)
trace_vhost_vdpa_init(dev, opaque);
int ret;
- /*
- * Similar to VFIO, we end up pinning all guest memory and have to
- * disable discarding of RAM.
- */
- ret = ram_block_discard_disable(true);
- if (ret) {
- error_report("Cannot set discarding of RAM broken");
- return ret;
- }
-
v = opaque;
v->dev = dev;
dev->opaque = opaque ;
@@ -452,6 +442,16 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_init(struct vhost_dev *dev, void *opaque, Error **errp)
return 0;
}
+ /*
+ * Similar to VFIO, we end up pinning all guest memory and have to
+ * disable discarding of RAM.
+ */
+ ret = ram_block_discard_disable(true);
+ if (ret) {
+ error_report("Cannot set discarding of RAM broken");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
vhost_vdpa_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE |
VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER);
@@ -577,12 +577,15 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev)
assert(dev->vhost_ops->backend_type == VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_VDPA);
v = dev->opaque;
trace_vhost_vdpa_cleanup(dev, v);
+ if (vhost_vdpa_first_dev(dev)) {
+ ram_block_discard_disable(false);
+ }
+
vhost_vdpa_host_notifiers_uninit(dev, dev->nvqs);
memory_listener_unregister(&v->listener);
vhost_vdpa_svq_cleanup(dev);
dev->opaque = NULL;
- ram_block_discard_disable(false);
return 0;
}
Although it does not make a big difference, its more correct and simplifies the cleanup path in subsequent patches. Move ram_block_discard_disable(false) call to the top of vhost_vdpa_cleanup because: * We cannot use vhost_vdpa_first_dev after dev->opaque = NULL assignment. * Improve the stack order in cleanup: since it is the last action taken in init, it should be the first at cleanup. Signed-off-by: Eugenio PĂ©rez <eperezma@redhat.com> --- hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c | 25 ++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)