@@ -3705,18 +3705,77 @@ static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_pauth(const ARMISARegisters *id)
(FIELD_DP64(0, ID_AA64ISAR1, APA, 0xf) |
FIELD_DP64(0, ID_AA64ISAR1, API, 0xf) |
FIELD_DP64(0, ID_AA64ISAR1, GPA, 0xf) |
- FIELD_DP64(0, ID_AA64ISAR1, GPI, 0xf))) != 0;
+ FIELD_DP64(0, ID_AA64ISAR1, GPI, 0xf))) != 0 ||
+ (id->id_aa64isar2 &
+ (FIELD_DP64(0, ID_AA64ISAR2, APA3, 0xf) |
+ FIELD_DP64(0, ID_AA64ISAR2, GPA3, 0xf))) != 0;
}
-static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_pauth_arch(const ARMISARegisters *id)
+static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_pauth_arch_qarma5(const ARMISARegisters *id)
{
/*
- * Return true if pauth is enabled with the architected QARMA algorithm.
+ * Return true if pauth is enabled with the architected QARMA5 algorithm.
* QEMU will always set APA+GPA to the same value.
*/
return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64isar1, ID_AA64ISAR1, APA) != 0;
}
+static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_pauth_arch_qarma3(const ARMISARegisters *id)
+{
+ /*
+ * Return true if pauth is enabled with the architected QARMA3 algorithm.
+ * QEMU will always set APA3+GPA3 to the same result.
+ */
+ return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64isar2, ID_AA64ISAR2, APA3) != 0;
+}
+
+static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_pauth_arch(const ARMISARegisters *id)
+{
+ return isar_feature_aa64_pauth_arch_qarma5(id) ||
+ isar_feature_aa64_pauth_arch_qarma3(id);
+}
+
+static inline int isar_feature_pauth_get_features(const ARMISARegisters *id)
+{
+ if (isar_feature_aa64_pauth_arch_qarma5(id)) {
+ return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64isar1, ID_AA64ISAR1, APA);
+ } else if (isar_feature_aa64_pauth_arch_qarma3(id)) {
+ return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64isar2, ID_AA64ISAR2, APA3);
+ } else {
+ return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64isar1, ID_AA64ISAR1, API);
+ }
+}
+
+static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_pauth_epac(const ARMISARegisters *id)
+{
+ /*
+ * Note that unlike most AArch64 features, EPAC is treated (in the ARM
+ * psedocode, at least) as not being implemented by larger values of this
+ * field. Our usage of '>=' rather than '==' here causes our implementation
+ * of PAC logic to diverge from ARM pseudocode - we must check that
+ * isar_feature_aa64_pauth2() returns false AND
+ * isar_feature_aa64_pauth_epac() returns true, where the pseudocode reads
+ * as if EPAC is not implemented if the value of this register is > 0b10.
+ * See the implementation of pauth_addpac() for an example.
+ */
+ return isar_feature_pauth_get_features(id) >= 0b0010;
+}
+
+static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_pauth2(const ARMISARegisters *id)
+{
+ return isar_feature_pauth_get_features(id) >= 0b0011;
+}
+
+static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_fpac(const ARMISARegisters *id)
+{
+ return isar_feature_pauth_get_features(id) >= 0b0100;
+}
+
+static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_fpac_combine(const ARMISARegisters *id)
+{
+ return isar_feature_pauth_get_features(id) >= 0b0101;
+}
+
static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_tlbirange(const ARMISARegisters *id)
{
return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64isar0, ID_AA64ISAR0, TLB) == 2;
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static uint64_t pauth_computepac_impdef(uint64_t data, uint64_t modifier,
static uint64_t pauth_computepac(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t data,
uint64_t modifier, ARMPACKey key)
{
- if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_pauth_arch, env_archcpu(env))) {
+ if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_pauth_arch_qarma5, env_archcpu(env))) {
return pauth_computepac_architected(data, modifier, key);
} else {
return pauth_computepac_impdef(data, modifier, key);
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lindsay <aaron@os.amperecomputing.com> --- target/arm/cpu.h | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- target/arm/tcg/pauth_helper.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)