| Message ID | 20230405094256.1539122-1-imammedo@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v3] acpi: pcihp: make pending delete blocking action expire | expand |
On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 11:42:56AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > with Q35 using ACPI PCI hotplug by default, user's request to unplug > device is ignored when it's issued before guest OS has been booted. > And any additional attempt to request device hot-unplug afterwards > results in following error: > > "Device XYZ is already in the process of unplug" > > arguably it can be considered as a regression introduced by [2], > before which it was possible to issue unplug request multiple > times. > > Allowing pending delete blocking expire brings ACPI PCI hotplug > on par with native PCIe unplug behavior [1] and allows user > to repeat unplug requests at propper times. > Set expire timeout to arbitrary 1msec so user won't be able to > flood guest with SCI interrupts by calling device_del in tight loop. > > PS: > ACPI spec doesn't mandate what OSPM can do with GPEx.status > bits set before it's booted => it's impl. depended. > Status bits may be retained (I tested with one Windows version) > or cleared (Linux since 2.6 kernel times) during guest's ACPI > subsystem initialization. > Clearing status bits (though not wrong per se) hides the unplug > event from guest, and it's upto user to repeat device_del later > when guest is able to handle unplug requests. > > 1) 18416c62e3 ("pcie: expire pending delete") > 2) > Fixes: cce8944cc9ef ("qdev-monitor: Forbid repeated device_del") > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> > CC: mst@redhat.com > CC: anisinha@redhat.com > CC: jusual@redhat.com > CC: kraxel@redhat.com Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 11:42:56AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > with Q35 using ACPI PCI hotplug by default, user's request to unplug > device is ignored when it's issued before guest OS has been booted. > And any additional attempt to request device hot-unplug afterwards > results in following error: > > "Device XYZ is already in the process of unplug" > > arguably it can be considered as a regression introduced by [2], > before which it was possible to issue unplug request multiple > times. First, thanks for this fix. I'm going to test it with the libvirt-based reproducer from here[1]. [1] https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/309. > Allowing pending delete blocking expire brings ACPI PCI hotplug A small nit-pick, if you don't mind (as discussed on #qemu, OFTC IRC): Please rephrase the commit summary-line to "acpi: pcihp: allow repeating hot-unplug requests". The phrase "Allowing pending delete blocking expire" reads unclear to me. Specifically, I'm not sure how to parse the line "pending delete blocking". I don't know the internals of AHCI to be able to suggest a rephrasing of this bit. All I know is that the core idea here is to allow reissuing of hot-unplug requests. Hence I suggested to rename the commit summary-line. :-) > on par with native PCIe unplug behavior [1] and allows user > to repeat unplug requests at propper times. > Set expire timeout to arbitrary 1msec so user won't be able to > flood guest with SCI interrupts by calling device_del in tight loop. > > PS: > ACPI spec doesn't mandate what OSPM can do with GPEx.status > bits set before it's booted => it's impl. depended. > Status bits may be retained (I tested with one Windows version) > or cleared (Linux since 2.6 kernel times) during guest's ACPI > subsystem initialization. > Clearing status bits (though not wrong per se) hides the unplug > event from guest, and it's upto user to repeat device_del later > when guest is able to handle unplug requests. > > 1) 18416c62e3 ("pcie: expire pending delete") > 2) > Fixes: cce8944cc9ef ("qdev-monitor: Forbid repeated device_del") > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> > CC: mst@redhat.com > CC: anisinha@redhat.com > CC: jusual@redhat.com > CC: kraxel@redhat.com > --- > v3: > * fix typo in comment > * move CC to the main commit message body > v2: > * change timeout to 1ms > * add comment to expire usage > * massage commit message to be a bit more clear > --- > hw/acpi/pcihp.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/hw/acpi/pcihp.c b/hw/acpi/pcihp.c > index dcfb779a7a..cdd6f775a1 100644 > --- a/hw/acpi/pcihp.c > +++ b/hw/acpi/pcihp.c > @@ -357,6 +357,16 @@ void acpi_pcihp_device_unplug_request_cb(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, > * acpi_pcihp_eject_slot() when the operation is completed. > */ > pdev->qdev.pending_deleted_event = true; > + /* if unplug was requested before OSPM is initialized, > + * linux kernel will clear GPE0.sts[] bits during boot, which effectively > + * hides unplug event. And than followup qmp_device_del() calls remain > + * blocked by above flag permanently. > + * Unblock qmp_device_del() by setting expire limit, so user can > + * repeat unplug request later when OSPM has been booted. > + */ > + pdev->qdev.pending_deleted_expires_ms = > + qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL); /* 1 msec */ > + > s->acpi_pcihp_pci_status[bsel].down |= (1U << slot); > acpi_send_event(DEVICE(hotplug_dev), ACPI_PCI_HOTPLUG_STATUS); > } > -- > 2.39.1 > >
diff --git a/hw/acpi/pcihp.c b/hw/acpi/pcihp.c index dcfb779a7a..cdd6f775a1 100644 --- a/hw/acpi/pcihp.c +++ b/hw/acpi/pcihp.c @@ -357,6 +357,16 @@ void acpi_pcihp_device_unplug_request_cb(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, * acpi_pcihp_eject_slot() when the operation is completed. */ pdev->qdev.pending_deleted_event = true; + /* if unplug was requested before OSPM is initialized, + * linux kernel will clear GPE0.sts[] bits during boot, which effectively + * hides unplug event. And than followup qmp_device_del() calls remain + * blocked by above flag permanently. + * Unblock qmp_device_del() by setting expire limit, so user can + * repeat unplug request later when OSPM has been booted. + */ + pdev->qdev.pending_deleted_expires_ms = + qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL); /* 1 msec */ + s->acpi_pcihp_pci_status[bsel].down |= (1U << slot); acpi_send_event(DEVICE(hotplug_dev), ACPI_PCI_HOTPLUG_STATUS); }
with Q35 using ACPI PCI hotplug by default, user's request to unplug device is ignored when it's issued before guest OS has been booted. And any additional attempt to request device hot-unplug afterwards results in following error: "Device XYZ is already in the process of unplug" arguably it can be considered as a regression introduced by [2], before which it was possible to issue unplug request multiple times. Allowing pending delete blocking expire brings ACPI PCI hotplug on par with native PCIe unplug behavior [1] and allows user to repeat unplug requests at propper times. Set expire timeout to arbitrary 1msec so user won't be able to flood guest with SCI interrupts by calling device_del in tight loop. PS: ACPI spec doesn't mandate what OSPM can do with GPEx.status bits set before it's booted => it's impl. depended. Status bits may be retained (I tested with one Windows version) or cleared (Linux since 2.6 kernel times) during guest's ACPI subsystem initialization. Clearing status bits (though not wrong per se) hides the unplug event from guest, and it's upto user to repeat device_del later when guest is able to handle unplug requests. 1) 18416c62e3 ("pcie: expire pending delete") 2) Fixes: cce8944cc9ef ("qdev-monitor: Forbid repeated device_del") Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> CC: mst@redhat.com CC: anisinha@redhat.com CC: jusual@redhat.com CC: kraxel@redhat.com --- v3: * fix typo in comment * move CC to the main commit message body v2: * change timeout to 1ms * add comment to expire usage * massage commit message to be a bit more clear --- hw/acpi/pcihp.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)