From patchwork Tue Sep 19 16:08:12 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mattias Nissler X-Patchwork-Id: 13391589 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3B77CE79A9 for ; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 16:09:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qidHS-0001p9-G9; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 12:08:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qidHO-0001nZ-NE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 12:08:51 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qidHL-0004hP-Jf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 12:08:50 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1c465d59719so21834185ad.1 for ; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 09:08:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1695139725; x=1695744525; darn=nongnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=y6xthKlgZacOdOdKfVjLGvE40RnnIrZnmgq2bIqI3+Y=; b=Nvhvl5DxJ2C1v89pyOXBfNuHCR4jPKf/nF5QD3glfdrLOuvh1DRAqIZuI0V9b+6xXi ZN1ghioXmxj6RQSOfOkaatHdE6qJC4PajnTpf/ABrt3I0Wi6aaRe0Aa0ayKJ9Ls6gJdl p4MF2YZmx6hPnzXemowpA99uGaXQAX1cnF2RsDMLCvKtN/Dl9cffbXc/9UkhBdzE+VwO PKGED4HZQOtW2/qevGaU42+EXVijoCOsmU9mGpKN80cs4/sHcip+8+DAm4PhaO5U2XDx +CRs76AS50cIck5tViVoyRko+OI4lsOrQRHUwGcDidzLchYOuOPt93/ZMeg4PafC2ou5 kSxg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1695139725; x=1695744525; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=y6xthKlgZacOdOdKfVjLGvE40RnnIrZnmgq2bIqI3+Y=; b=JrnU3lJq0xknwUCLpZHb2yBA44LuvxPedkxM052ApVHDRNpqAYafxFs8Pxu2JEU/CI XrXRluBJ6GG0n1TAsD48uLxIInMfDFrFAWPijYA6DosJC3w38rGmFOKRP6Q0AtI2D2UI kqXkFzIFEaNNu++6dJnCI6WOm8Fokt55wYeqLZDa7zO5wf73qCuOBNwWbiJnPvKvfTg5 oSTt+eSwyhuz1tfU4hMw02jXakUC7PoGii3ebcNsyUvUtZzcowcdd/+qYgOYYIhF1EMi rH5Gu+6+K2XS563u2LsvI7HFv3uzCbaHgg/ZfE+hVvKrESsq6BEvNGXa5uEsPTGnGzeQ 1N1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz9HD0noZmSpa8DqgKhr7E69XCnYPbIM2GONe4u4dO+7CrqfLAD x40HdCddmq6QM3GbtIJ14RGs3P4keoMmHLcxBfy7pw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH27onfQTimMcZhgbWsmAY7m5c+Q+aO0KkgFv5wtFdzA2+COZ0kwhVkjWaZ0LLufYYwubhYjA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:48e:b0:1c4:42d4:b477 with SMTP id jj14-20020a170903048e00b001c442d4b477mr9471297plb.9.1695139725336; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 09:08:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mnissler.ba.rivosinc.com ([66.220.2.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l9-20020a170902d34900b001b8a1a25e6asm8086308plk.128.2023.09.19.09.08.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 19 Sep 2023 09:08:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Mattias Nissler To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: john.levon@nutanix.com, stefanha@redhat.com, Richard Henderson , Elena Ufimtseva , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paolo Bonzini , Jagannathan Raman , Peter Xu , David Hildenbrand , Marcel Apfelbaum , =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-D?= =?utf-8?q?aud=C3=A9?= , Mattias Nissler Subject: [PATCH v4 4/5] vfio-user: Message-based DMA support Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 09:08:12 -0700 Message-Id: <20230919160814.3343727-5-mnissler@rivosinc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20230919160814.3343727-1-mnissler@rivosinc.com> References: <20230919160814.3343727-1-mnissler@rivosinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e; envelope-from=mnissler@rivosinc.com; helo=mail-pl1-x62e.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Wire up support for DMA for the case where the vfio-user client does not provide mmap()-able file descriptors, but DMA requests must be performed via the VFIO-user protocol. This installs an indirect memory region, which already works for pci_dma_{read,write}, and pci_dma_map works thanks to the existing DMA bounce buffering support. Note that while simple scenarios work with this patch, there's a known race condition in libvfio-user that will mess up the communication channel. See https://github.com/nutanix/libvfio-user/issues/279 for details as well as a proposed fix. Signed-off-by: Mattias Nissler --- hw/remote/trace-events | 2 + hw/remote/vfio-user-obj.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/remote/trace-events b/hw/remote/trace-events index 0d1b7d56a5..358a68fb34 100644 --- a/hw/remote/trace-events +++ b/hw/remote/trace-events @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ vfu_cfg_read(uint32_t offset, uint32_t val) "vfu: cfg: 0x%x -> 0x%x" vfu_cfg_write(uint32_t offset, uint32_t val) "vfu: cfg: 0x%x <- 0x%x" vfu_dma_register(uint64_t gpa, size_t len) "vfu: registering GPA 0x%"PRIx64", %zu bytes" vfu_dma_unregister(uint64_t gpa) "vfu: unregistering GPA 0x%"PRIx64"" +vfu_dma_read(uint64_t gpa, size_t len) "vfu: DMA read 0x%"PRIx64", %zu bytes" +vfu_dma_write(uint64_t gpa, size_t len) "vfu: DMA write 0x%"PRIx64", %zu bytes" vfu_bar_register(int i, uint64_t addr, uint64_t size) "vfu: BAR %d: addr 0x%"PRIx64" size 0x%"PRIx64"" vfu_bar_rw_enter(const char *op, uint64_t addr) "vfu: %s request for BAR address 0x%"PRIx64"" vfu_bar_rw_exit(const char *op, uint64_t addr) "vfu: Finished %s of BAR address 0x%"PRIx64"" diff --git a/hw/remote/vfio-user-obj.c b/hw/remote/vfio-user-obj.c index 8b10c32a3c..6a561f7969 100644 --- a/hw/remote/vfio-user-obj.c +++ b/hw/remote/vfio-user-obj.c @@ -300,6 +300,63 @@ static ssize_t vfu_object_cfg_access(vfu_ctx_t *vfu_ctx, char * const buf, return count; } +static MemTxResult vfu_dma_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t *val, + unsigned size, MemTxAttrs attrs) +{ + MemoryRegion *region = opaque; + vfu_ctx_t *vfu_ctx = VFU_OBJECT(region->owner)->vfu_ctx; + uint8_t buf[sizeof(uint64_t)]; + + trace_vfu_dma_read(region->addr + addr, size); + + g_autofree dma_sg_t *sg = g_malloc0(dma_sg_size()); + vfu_dma_addr_t vfu_addr = (vfu_dma_addr_t)(region->addr + addr); + if (vfu_addr_to_sgl(vfu_ctx, vfu_addr, size, sg, 1, PROT_READ) < 0 || + vfu_sgl_read(vfu_ctx, sg, 1, buf) != 0) { + return MEMTX_ERROR; + } + + *val = ldn_he_p(buf, size); + + return MEMTX_OK; +} + +static MemTxResult vfu_dma_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t val, + unsigned size, MemTxAttrs attrs) +{ + MemoryRegion *region = opaque; + vfu_ctx_t *vfu_ctx = VFU_OBJECT(region->owner)->vfu_ctx; + uint8_t buf[sizeof(uint64_t)]; + + trace_vfu_dma_write(region->addr + addr, size); + + stn_he_p(buf, size, val); + + g_autofree dma_sg_t *sg = g_malloc0(dma_sg_size()); + vfu_dma_addr_t vfu_addr = (vfu_dma_addr_t)(region->addr + addr); + if (vfu_addr_to_sgl(vfu_ctx, vfu_addr, size, sg, 1, PROT_WRITE) < 0 || + vfu_sgl_write(vfu_ctx, sg, 1, buf) != 0) { + return MEMTX_ERROR; + } + + return MEMTX_OK; +} + +static const MemoryRegionOps vfu_dma_ops = { + .read_with_attrs = vfu_dma_read, + .write_with_attrs = vfu_dma_write, + .endianness = DEVICE_HOST_ENDIAN, + .valid = { + .min_access_size = 1, + .max_access_size = 8, + .unaligned = true, + }, + .impl = { + .min_access_size = 1, + .max_access_size = 8, + }, +}; + static void dma_register(vfu_ctx_t *vfu_ctx, vfu_dma_info_t *info) { VfuObject *o = vfu_get_private(vfu_ctx); @@ -308,17 +365,30 @@ static void dma_register(vfu_ctx_t *vfu_ctx, vfu_dma_info_t *info) g_autofree char *name = NULL; struct iovec *iov = &info->iova; - if (!info->vaddr) { - return; - } - name = g_strdup_printf("mem-%s-%"PRIx64"", o->device, - (uint64_t)info->vaddr); + (uint64_t)iov->iov_base); subregion = g_new0(MemoryRegion, 1); - memory_region_init_ram_ptr(subregion, NULL, name, - iov->iov_len, info->vaddr); + if (info->vaddr) { + memory_region_init_ram_ptr(subregion, OBJECT(o), name, + iov->iov_len, info->vaddr); + } else { + /* + * Note that I/O regions' MemoryRegionOps handle accesses of at most 8 + * bytes at a time, and larger accesses are broken down. However, + * many/most DMA accesses are larger than 8 bytes and VFIO-user can + * handle large DMA accesses just fine, thus this size restriction + * unnecessarily hurts performance, in particular given that each + * access causes a round trip on the VFIO-user socket. + * + * TODO: Investigate how to plumb larger accesses through memory + * regions, possibly by amending MemoryRegionOps or by creating a new + * memory region type. + */ + memory_region_init_io(subregion, OBJECT(o), &vfu_dma_ops, subregion, + name, iov->iov_len); + } dma_as = pci_device_iommu_address_space(o->pci_dev);