From patchwork Thu Jan 25 03:23:01 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Xiaoyao Li X-Patchwork-Id: 13529960 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0710FC47258 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 03:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSqRf-0001qh-7s; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:30:27 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSqRd-0001iF-Bo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:30:25 -0500 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([192.198.163.10]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSqRb-0001Dr-Jo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:30:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1706153423; x=1737689423; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LMprznaE7hGwUz1+P1xbFwW0CPPmvi5wL423n1B1K+0=; b=Zz1TU5gJ2dqt5s/qAX5BRchYi/3sq1u0QlmghQ1Dz7dRjMzfW/CtZVkF mmqo82HOu3HkqqbqGYFkgUnwGd6+bnNaaVMjeODHW0bzK2JJllfaDCUuz jJRvNwPR+mqVF41Z72qw8ZC18D9qGik6/9ezhZS9vzBlXqS644h/VDj45 eMmvYkMS5ppEGf7Y1INAon4zqy25fqsNpjnJB2vFz+Oaaw0OoeSNVZph9 GQZtRZC4SDXTRtI5yPivcRlyX69QJQZSeGejNDeGm4dbB6NFTKmkTIVMR YlNnbq7UDVU+llsvrvbiVIXOm+BKLCftPw9ssDH1CNndveoTSNnKzJoJG g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10962"; a="9429477" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,216,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="9429477" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Jan 2024 19:27:12 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,216,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="2085901" Received: from lxy-clx-4s.sh.intel.com ([10.239.48.52]) by orviesa005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Jan 2024 19:27:07 -0800 From: Xiaoyao Li To: Paolo Bonzini , David Hildenbrand , Igor Mammedov , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Marcel Apfelbaum , Richard Henderson , Peter Xu , =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Cornelia Huck , =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P_=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= , Eric Blake , Markus Armbruster , Marcelo Tosatti Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, xiaoyao.li@intel.com, Michael Roth , Sean Christopherson , Claudio Fontana , Gerd Hoffmann , Isaku Yamahata , Chenyi Qiang Subject: [PATCH v4 39/66] i386/tdx: Don't initialize pc.rom for TDX VMs Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:23:01 -0500 Message-Id: <20240125032328.2522472-40-xiaoyao.li@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240125032328.2522472-1-xiaoyao.li@intel.com> References: <20240125032328.2522472-1-xiaoyao.li@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=192.198.163.10; envelope-from=xiaoyao.li@intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.999, HK_RANDOM_FROM=1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org For TDX, the address below 1MB are entirely general RAM. No need to initialize pc.rom memory region for TDs. Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li --- This is more as a workaround of the issue that for q35 machine type, the real memslot update (which requires memslot deletion )for pc.rom happens after tdx_init_memory_region. It leads to the private memory ADD'ed before get lost. I haven't work out a good solution to resolve the order issue. So just skip the pc.rom setup to avoid memslot deletion. --- hw/i386/pc.c | 21 ++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c index 5c80b5fe8a0e..f38694902764 100644 --- a/hw/i386/pc.c +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ #include "sysemu/xen.h" #include "sysemu/reset.h" #include "kvm/kvm_i386.h" +#include "kvm/tdx.h" #include "hw/xen/xen.h" #include "qapi/qmp/qlist.h" #include "qemu/error-report.h" @@ -1039,16 +1040,18 @@ void pc_memory_init(PCMachineState *pcms, /* Initialize PC system firmware */ pc_system_firmware_init(pcms, rom_memory); - option_rom_mr = g_malloc(sizeof(*option_rom_mr)); - memory_region_init_ram(option_rom_mr, NULL, "pc.rom", PC_ROM_SIZE, - &error_fatal); - if (pcmc->pci_enabled) { - memory_region_set_readonly(option_rom_mr, true); + if (!is_tdx_vm()) { + option_rom_mr = g_malloc(sizeof(*option_rom_mr)); + memory_region_init_ram(option_rom_mr, NULL, "pc.rom", PC_ROM_SIZE, + &error_fatal); + if (pcmc->pci_enabled) { + memory_region_set_readonly(option_rom_mr, true); + } + memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(rom_memory, + PC_ROM_MIN_VGA, + option_rom_mr, + 1); } - memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(rom_memory, - PC_ROM_MIN_VGA, - option_rom_mr, - 1); fw_cfg = fw_cfg_arch_create(machine, x86ms->boot_cpus, x86ms->apic_id_limit);