From patchwork Mon Apr 8 08:44:03 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Duan, Zhenzhong" X-Patchwork-Id: 13620804 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C01A7C67861 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 08:48:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rtkeG-0001kC-6m; Mon, 08 Apr 2024 04:46:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rtkeE-0001dI-7q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2024 04:46:38 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([198.175.65.12]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rtkeC-0004Mu-HO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2024 04:46:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1712565996; x=1744101996; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=flRYI8hlBU+mW5grayHqfg01LbC404dPjtoArd2qk8s=; b=MLm2ZQpzn5AZ6YIo0iyiPHmfBim7YxyFVB/LcQqqotQ6k8cbXPW6CX9V Jd9ys9CYrp46sTCBf4BUHmZAyevIIfMiw83toh8sGImfzuZOcdjLmwUzt Kp+HRIAfPBDIdX1D5VBr99Uf2lxgSVM5hXXnZ7cCEoPNl5GQDBhW2yuu5 ysiPEJp11mxDeV9Kc8kpH4YV4ak+XjfZ0/y2O3o/yoIfu8VilZlu2AOJU umfhwm5Vmcg0Y7+z3CgTjNIyEJpe+g41xRc4v6kc76aYUn4+TdzW4VVy8 Z5bvrxoGP7QLT1n2NmmGHvUUGMQ8su0uAxfAtf9sFLK8hKToTLT+Derp4 Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: N7pLhJR4TPSVGcT+mRXhNA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: qqwbGFKySNiT6mWwqHGHwg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11037"; a="19269471" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,186,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="19269471" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Apr 2024 01:46:35 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: hQvSYEWOTAmiXTZQgt6MmA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: kRLFz5DtQKqCmRNbavtyeA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,186,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="42985899" Received: from spr-s2600bt.bj.intel.com ([10.240.192.124]) by fmviesa002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Apr 2024 01:46:31 -0700 From: Zhenzhong Duan To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, clg@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, jgg@nvidia.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com, joao.m.martins@oracle.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com, chao.p.peng@intel.com, Zhenzhong Duan , Marcel Apfelbaum , Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson , Eduardo Habkost Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] intel_iommu: Check for compatibility with legacy device Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 16:44:03 +0800 Message-Id: <20240408084404.1111628-5-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240408084404.1111628-1-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> References: <20240408084404.1111628-1-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.175.65.12; envelope-from=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -51 X-Spam_score: -5.2 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: (-5.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-2.355, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Currently only stage-2 translation is supported which is backed by shadow page table on host side. So we don't need exact matching of each bit of cap/ecap between vIOMMU and host. However, we can still ensure compatibility of host and vIOMMU's address width at least, i.e., vIOMMU's aw-bits <= host IOMMU aw-bits, which is missed before. Signed-off-by: Yi Liu Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan --- hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c index a49b587c73..d2cd186df0 100644 --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c @@ -3824,6 +3824,21 @@ static int vtd_check_legacy_hdev(IntelIOMMUState *s, HostIOMMUDevice *hiod, Error **errp) { + HostIOMMUDeviceClass *hiodc = HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(hiod); + HIOD_LEGACY_INFO info; + int ret; + + ret = hiodc->get_host_iommu_info(hiod, &info, sizeof(info), errp); + if (ret) { + return ret; + } + + if (s->aw_bits > info.aw_bits) { + error_setg(errp, "aw-bits %d > host aw-bits %d", + s->aw_bits, info.aw_bits); + return -EINVAL; + } + return 0; }